The "LLM as a Judge" paradigm, which uses LLMs to evaluate other LLMs, has proven valuable for many evaluation tasks. While it cannot completely replace humans for some critical tasks, it is highly effective for others that hold significant practical value. This paper examines how various LLMs function as evaluators for specific tasks, such as knowledge reasoning. The research yields several important findings: it provides a detailed evaluation of different LLMs as judges, highlighting their varied performance levels. Additionally, the authors compare evaluation methods, demonstrating that Cohen's kappa is superior to percent alignment—a conclusion unsurprising to those familiar with evaluation techniques. The study also offers other insights for developing LLM-based evaluation frameworks.
#LLMEvaluation
GenAI Leadership @ AWS • Stanford AI • Ex-, Amazon Alexa, Nvidia, Qualcomm • EB-1 "Einstein Visa" Recipient/Mentor • EMNLP 2023 Outstanding Paper Award
5moThanks for the kind words! Apart from Vipula and I, Prof. Amitava Das was the brains behind the tutorial, credits to him :)