Try Ajitiono’s Post

Topic 3: The Importance of Unit Testing in App and Backend Development #Webfluxy #WebAppDev #webtechnicals Unit testing plays a crucial role in app and backend development by ensuring code reliability, stability, and efficiency. Here are some key reasons why unit testing is important in both domains: 1. Early Bug Detection Unit tests isolate individual pieces of code, allowing developers to identify bugs early in the development process. Detecting and resolving issues early reduces the cost and complexity of fixing problems later. 2. Code Quality Improvement Unit testing promotes cleaner, more modular code because it encourages developers to think about the code's structure and dependencies. This leads to well-organized, reusable, and maintainable code. 3. Simplified Refactoring With a solid suite of unit tests, developers can refactor code with confidence. If any test fails, they know immediately that a change has affected the code's functionality, helping prevent unintended consequences. 4. Enhanced Documentation Unit tests provide a form of documentation for the code. By reading the tests, other developers can understand the intended behavior of specific components, making it easier to work with unfamiliar code. 5. Faster Development Cycle Although writing unit tests initially requires time, it ultimately speeds up the development process. Developers can quickly run tests to check if code changes have introduced bugs, making the development process more efficient. 6. Improved Reliability and Stability Unit tests ensure that each part of the application works as expected, which improves the overall reliability of the app. This is particularly crucial in backend development, where server stability and data integrity are essential. 7. Better Integration Testing By catching issues at the unit level, developers reduce the number of issues that make it to integration testing. This makes integration testing more manageable, as the components being integrated have already been tested individually. 8. Facilitates Agile and Continuous Integration (CI) In agile and CI workflows, frequent updates and code merges require rapid feedback. Unit tests provide quick verification, ensuring new code works as intended and integrates smoothly with existing code. In summary, unit testing is an investment in code quality and development efficiency, helping create more robust and maintainable applications. By reducing the likelihood of bugs, it also improves the user experience, making unit testing essential in app and backend development. #AIAssisted 📞 +234 813 164 9219 📧 [email protected]

🚀 Excited to share my latest tech article on Jest Mocking for Unit Testing! 🧪💻 In today's fast-paced development environment, writing robust unit tests is crucial for ensuring the stability and reliability of our code. And one powerful tool in the arsenal of every JavaScript developer is Jest mocking. In my latest article, I delve deep into the world of Jest mocking, exploring its versatility and efficiency in writing effective unit tests. From mocking functions and modules to handling asynchronous code with ease, Jest offers a plethora of features that streamline the testing process and boost productivity. Whether you're a seasoned developer looking to enhance your testing skills or a newcomer eager to learn the ropes, this article has something for everyone. Dive in to discover practical examples, best practices, and tips for mastering Jest mocking in your projects. Check out the full article here https://lnkd.in/grxSnD7n #Jest #UnitTesting #SoftwareDevelopment #TechArticle #DeveloperCommunity

🧪 The Bittersweet Symphony of Unit Testing 🧪 Ah, unit testing. Just the phrase alone can bring a collective groan from developers everywhere. It's like that workout you dread - you know it's good for you, but starting is the hardest part! 😩💻 Let's be real: writing unit tests can feel like a chore. The initial resistance, the extra time, the moments when you'd rather be doing literally anything else... But, like the saying goes, "No pain, no gain." Here's the upside: Sustainable Code 🌱: Think of unit tests as the guardians of your codebase. They ensure your code remains robust and adaptable, saving you from future headaches. Confidence Booster 💪: Adding new features? Refactoring? Unit tests have your back, whispering, "Go ahead, I've got you covered." That green check mark is more than a test pass—it's peace of mind. Building Better 🏗️: The necessity of unit testing encourages writing more modular, testable code from the start. It's like coding with a net, guiding you toward best practices and cleaner architecture. Yes, the dread of writing unit tests is real, but so are the benefits. It's about more than just catching bugs; it's about crafting a codebase that's resilient, maintainable, and scalable. And honestly, there's a certain satisfaction in seeing all those tests pass, isn't there? ✅️ So next time you're hesitating to write that unit test, remember: it's a small step for a developer, but a giant leap for the codebase. Embrace the test; your future self will thank you. 🚀

Docs-as-code: automated tests (and conclusion) This is a brief series on what docs-as-code implies, not just what it is. Today's post is not just about automated tests; it also concludes this mini-series. This post was harder to write because I'm still looking into automated tests. Personally, I really like the idea of automatically testing all my documentation whenever I submit it for review. I do want spelling and grammar checkers; I do want to see whether things align with our style guide; I don't want to have to press a button to do it. If you're like me, you will quickly run into reality: someone needs to implement it. - You look for tool to check spelling. - Then maybe you need a tool to check grammar. - Then you go looking for a tool to check style rules. - You add a few little things here and there. - Then you try to make the tools work, period. - And then, if your tools work, you can think about having them work automatically. You need to make a decision: do you want the tools to be semi-automatic, available when you write on your computer? Or would you prefer they work when you submit documentation for review? This changes the implementation. Then you need to figure out at what point in the production chain you implement the testing; who gets the results; what the cost is; how you respond to it; and so forth. By this point, it's possible a lot of time has gone by. So... yes, automated tests sound incredibly useful, and I have seen great implementations... but they need to be implemented in the first place. Why does this sound familiar? Oh, that's right. It sounds familiar because this is like writing software! It's even in the name: docs-as-code. You're writing code, with coding tools. You're a programmer now. Congratulations! Some people refer to docs-as-code as a philosophy, but it's more of a process, like software development or business security. You research things, decide things, implement things in order to write things close to developers with their advantages. The benefits are attractive if you can make full use of the process, but you need actual staff to keep it working. And seen that way, docs-as-code is not just a process -- it's a product, with its own implementation and engineering team! That's what docs-as-code implies: your productivity may improve from useful tools that need a team to implement, maintain, and improve. Also you're a developer now, Harry!

🧪 The Bittersweet Symphony of Unit Testing 🧪 Ah, unit testing. Just the phrase alone can bring a collective groan from developers everywhere. It's like that workout you dread - you know it's good for you, but starting is the hardest part! 😩💻 Let's be real... writing unit tests can feel like a chore. The initial resistance, the extra time, the moments when you'd rather be doing literally anything else. But, like the saying goes, "No pain, no gain." Here's the upside: Sustainable Code 🌱: Think of unit tests as the guardians of your codebase. They ensure your code remains robust and adaptable, saving you from future headaches. Confidence Booster 💪: Adding new features? Refactoring? Unit tests have your back, whispering, "Go ahead, I've got you covered." That green check mark is more than a test pass—it's peace of mind. Building Better 🏗️: The necessity of unit testing encourages writing more modular, testable code from the start. It's like coding with a net, guiding you toward best practices and cleaner architecture. Yes, the dread of writing unit tests is real, but so are the benefits. It's about more than just catching bugs; it's about crafting a codebase that's resilient, maintainable, and scalable. And honestly, there's a certain satisfaction in seeing all those tests pass, isn't there? ✅️ So next time you're hesitating to write that unit test, remember: it's a small step for a developer, but a giant leap for the codebase. Embrace the test; your future self will thank you. 🚀

Why add tests, it’s only an experiment! I’ve heard this objection to testing several times in my career. Especially around frontend-related work. Somehow, people feel that if it’s frontend, it’ll change so frequently that testing is a waste of time. I don’t know from where does this fallacy come… But that’s a topic for another post. Today, I’m going to try and convince you that experiments last. And experiments have to be high quality. Why do you do experiments? In order to disprove a hypothesis. In the case of business, you want to disprove the hypothesis that feature A will be valuable to the customer. So, you set up some metrics, implement it and start observing the results. And then, lo and behold, it really isn’t valuable to the customer! But why? Is there a single, objective reason? Or are there many bits and pieces that have skewed your results? If you haven’t tested the experiment properly, there will definitely be many false negatives. We call some of them bugs. Things that frustrate the user and thus make them not like your new functionality. The other thing is that some hypotheses take a really long time to be overturned. Years maybe. So, the experiments for these hypotheses stay and linger. And whenever you want to create a new experiment based on the existing one, you can easily introduce bugs if you don’t have proper tests in place. All that is leading me to the conclusion that, in order to have a sound business, we need high quality experiments. And the only way to have high quality experiments is through testing. Doing TDD in particular. #TestDrivenDevelopment #Lean #ContinuousDelivery

Unit testing Concept which i learnt : 😊 😊 Unit testing is a software testing technique where individual units or components of a software application are tested in isolation to ensure that they behave as expected. In the context of React applications, unit testing focuses on testing individual components, functions, or methods to verify that they return the correct output given specific inputs. What is a Unit? A "unit" refers to the smallest testable part of an application. In React, this could be a component, function, or hook. Each unit should ideally be isolated from others. Purpose of Unit Testing: ✍🏻 Catch Bugs Early ✍🏻 Ensure Code Reliability ✍🏻 Enable Refactoring ✍🏻 Improve Documentation Test Frameworks and Tools: Jest: A popular testing framework for JavaScript applications, often used with React. It comes with features like test runners, assertion libraries, and mocking. React Testing Library: A library that helps test React components in a way that closely mimics real user interactions. Mocha/Chai: Another testing framework (Mocha) paired with an assertion library (Chai) that is often used for unit testing JavaScript applications. Enzyme: Though somewhat less commonly used now, Enzyme was a popular testing utility for React applications to render and test React components. Writing Unit Tests: Arrange: Set up the conditions for your test. Act: Execute the unit or function you want to test. Testing React Components: Testing in React typically focuses on: Rendering the Component: Verifying if the component renders correctly. Props: Ensuring that the component handles props correctly. User Interactions: Simulating events like clicks, form submissions, and key presses. State Changes: Testing if the component's internal state changes as expected.     6. Mocking: In unit tests, you often want to test units in isolation. Mocking allows you to   replace dependencies (like APIs or other functions) with fake implementations to test a unit in isolation. Mocking Functions: You can mock specific functions using Jest’s jest.fn() or jest.mock() to isolate the unit being tested. Mocking API Calls: You can mock API calls in unit tests to avoid making real HTTP requests.

Why I Hate Unit Testing You know what I hate? Unit testing. There, I said it. I can already hear the tech purists gasping in horror, clutching their keyboards as if I've just insulted their mother. But let's be honest—does anyone actually enjoy writing unit tests? It's like flossing your teeth: you know it's good for you, but it's tedious, time-consuming, and you'd rather be doing anything else. First off, unit testing feels like doing the same thing twice. You write the code, then you write the tests to make sure the code works. But if you wrote the code correctly the first time, why do you need to double-check it? It's like baking a cake and then baking a miniature version of the same cake just to make sure you followed the recipe correctly. Who has time for that? And let's talk about the false sense of security unit tests give you. Just because your code passes a bunch of tests doesn't mean it's bulletproof. It's like putting a padlock on a cardboard box and thinking your valuables are safe. Sure, it might deter a casual thief, but anyone determined enough can still rip right through it. Similarly, your code can pass all the unit tests in the world and still crash and burn when it hits the real world with its unpredictable data and user behavior. Another thing that grinds my gears about unit testing is how it stifles creativity. Programming should be an art, a canvas where you paint your logic and algorithms. Unit testing is like having a stern art teacher looking over your shoulder, making sure you stay within the lines and follow all the rules. It takes the joy out of coding, reducing it to a series of mechanical, soulless steps. And don't get me started on the maintenance. Oh, the maintenance! Every time you make a change to your code, you have to go back and update the tests. It's like cleaning your house before the cleaning lady arrives. You end up spending more time fixing the tests than improving your actual code. It's a never-ending cycle of code-test-fix, code-test-fix, that drives you to the brink of insanity. Lastly, there's the smug satisfaction of the unit testing evangelists. You know the type—the ones who look at you like you're a caveman for not embracing unit testing with the fervor of a religious convert. They're like the people who brag about going to the gym at 5 a.m. every day, as if that makes them morally superior. Well, good for them. Some of us prefer our sanity. So, there you have it. Unit testing may be the darling of the software development world, but to me, it's just an unnecessary chore, a creativity killer, and a false prophet of code quality. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got some real coding to do—unit tests not included - ChatGPT and Claude are more than happy to help me in that regard.

Hey fellow devs! 👋 Ever felt overwhelmed by web testing? I just discovered KaneAI by LambdaTest, and it's a game-changer! Let me walk you through how it's transforming my testing workflow. First up: AI-Powered Test Creation. This is where the magic happens! You can either describe your test scenario in plain language, or use the Web Agent to record your manual interactions. KaneAI turns them into automated tests! One feature I'm loving is the Version History 📜 It's like Git for your tests! You can experiment freely, knowing you can always roll back if something goes wrong. Perfect for iterative development! Just like Git, you can see a complete history of changes made to your test cases. This is invaluable for understanding how your tests have evolved over time and identifying when potential issues were introduced. Need to review changes for compliance or debugging? Version History provides a clear audit trail of all modifications. It's your test case time machine, allowing you to jump back to any point in your test's lifecycle! If this sounds exciting, do retweet and give it a like! Comment down your thoughts.......... KaneAI is the future of testing! 🔥 Link for beta the comments 🔽 #KaneAI

Today I want to talk about automated tests, especially with RSpec. Ensuring code quality is essential, but with the rush of daily tasks, tests sometimes get postponed. And that's when legacy code starts to appear. In my last post, I talked about SRP (Single Responsibility Principle) and how it helps organize and maintain your code. Well, SRP also can help with your automated tests. If you are just starting or already have experience, balancing writing tests with deadlines is not easy. Sometimes, tests get pushed aside, and that never comes. As a result, the legacy code grows. Some companies take quality so seriously that if your code doesn't have good test coverage, the pipeline won't even pass to review stage. With that in mind, I want to share some of my experience that's helped me since the beginning and keep helping me everyday. When we follow SRP, class tests usually have one describe block for the class and, inside it, another describe block for the method being tested. In RSpec, the subject is the thing you're testing. Setting up the test like this makes it clear what's being validated, making it easier for another dev to quickly understand. If the method needs parameters, that's where let and before come into play to set up the test scenario. The "let" is great for defining parameters that might change depending on the context. That's where context comes in. With contexts, you can test the same subject but with different parameters, making it clear which scenario is being tested. This is super important because context serves as a kind of documentation that ensures different situations are being checked. After the scenario, you move on to expectations, which go in the it blocks. RSpec has a lot of powerful matchers that cover almost every situation. A practical tip: One matcher that has always helped me is not_to raise_error. Here's an example: it { expect { your_subject }.not_to raise_error } This spec is great for those just starting or when dealing with legacy code. It helps you see if the method runs without any exceptions. Once you feel more confident, you can start adding more specific matchers. This approach scales well. As more methods and classes are added, the test structure remains organized and easy to maintain, which is crucial for larger projects. This is how I organize my tests. I hope it helps you in your daily work, it helped me in the beginning, especially when I was starting. If you have read this far, comment on how you got started with tests.