Meta lost $200 Billion in value this morning. The reason and what it means for you is interesting - so buckle up. Meta has a future spending problem. Or so the market took it that way. Zuck's plans for AI and the increased spending associated with it in the coming years rattled investors. And the unclear plan for monetization didn't help. So what does this mean for us? (prediction incoming - but as I've said before... what do I know) 👉 1️⃣ Marketers should anticipate CPM's increasing in the coming months. Meta has to offset those costs somehow, and you, the advertiser, are going to feel it. Not scary though. It's been done before. And if you are doing these things you'll be just fine: - have a well rounded marketing strategy (don't only rely on Meta), - focus on strategic measurement, - have a results>activity approach 👉 2️⃣ More AI incoming. Which ultimately means more automation and lower barrier to entry to Meta Ads in the coming year(s). Emphasizing the importance that marketers must be strategic minds and not button pushers.
If CPM's increase is offset by their investment in AI for efficiency then net-net let's it should work out
Well said. Not to mention AI investment being a big driver behind Meta's recovery post ATT.
Can someone please tell Marky Mark I only have $10 for him and I need $7 for lunch?
YES - well said Tristan Ramirez
$1Bn in client revenue - d2c, saas and ai
7moI don't think Meta will try offset its AI related CAPEX by increasing CPMs. Advertising inventory is almost their only source of revenue right now (much like Google). So why would they dare to to risk it by p*ssing of advertisers even more? I bet they have done the risk:reward calculation and they won't take such an "obvious" but risk step.