Here is my new Planetizen column: “Applying the New Traffic Safety Paradigm” (https://lnkd.in/gvEUvh9h ). The new traffic safety paradigm recognizes exposure — total vehicle travel — as a risk factor, and therefore the additional casualties caused by planning decisions that induce more driving, and the safety benefits of VMT reductions. This was written in part in response to recent debates generated by Professor Wes Marshall's book "Killed by a Traffic Engineer." A key message in his book is the importance of recognizing the additional traffic casualties that result from increased vehicle travel and the safety benefits of vehicle travel reductions, for example, that result from public transit improvements. What do you think? Should vehicle travel reductions be recognized as traffic safety strategies?
Should the gun ban be recognized as a measure to reduce gun violence? :)
I think it's part of the broader picture of recognising what we're trying to achieve, which is moving people/goods from A to B (could take a further step back and consider whether the travel is necessary at all, but assuming it is). Getting people onto trains rather than in cars (for example) will be safer, more efficient, better for the environment etc. and should be recognised as such.
Todd - do you have any recent safety data I can review on Operation SNAP? Pace Car and "20 is Plenty"?
Yes! But not by themselves; they must be combined with road space reallocation and speed reduction strategies.
Passionate about saving lives globally in transport
5moI would add it’s also the roads that the travel is occurring on. It your commuting of a freeway most of your journey (or better still a low speed urban commute) you are a lot less likely to be killed or seriously hurt than if you have much of your journey on higher speed two lane rural roads with no safety barriers. Many year ago my brother was involved in a serious head on crash. He was commuting 40 mins a day each way on rural two lane roads from a town to a city. In addition he was taking the poorer design narrow back roads to safe time not the State Highways (although in both cases these routes were 100km/h and no median protection). My advice to him was to move to the city he worked in and reduce his exposure to crash risk - which he did. So it comes down to understanding the risk of your commute and travel in general. Even if you are a good driver you are at the mercy of the bad driving behaviours of others - like the young inexperienced driver who in the fog had a head on crash with my brother. She walked away while he suffered.