Interesting study of how tenants and building owners view retrofit costs/benefits. I'm looking forward to more on this from Pembina. It's for sure different when you own your home (you pay for the retrofit AND get to enjoy the wonder of living in a better building) but the tension between costs and benefits is the same.
Split incentive or common ground?: Rethinking tenant and building owner perspectives on deep retrofits for equitable climate solutions "Deep retrofits have been recognized across Canada as being critical to meeting climate targets and ensuring homes are healthy, climate-safe, and affordable to heat and cool. But when it comes to energy efficient buildings, residents and building owners can sometimes find themselves at odds... "Addressing the split incentive challenge on a large scale will require residents and landlords to start from common ground to reach mutually satisfying solutions. The Pembina Institute will be building from these preliminary findings with further research to explore the appetite of residents and landlords for collaborations, such as setting performance objectives and targets together, participating in incentive and energy efficiency programs offered by utilities and governments, and exploring alternative deep retrofit financing like green leasing programs. "Retrofitting multi-unit residential buildings is a critical step towards ensuring Canada’s housing stock is healthy, climate-safe, and affordable. Meaningful consultation with building owners and residents will help ensure that these retrofits can be done in a way that maximizes the benefits and reduces the costs for both groups." Read more from my Pembina Institute colleagues Rachel Sutton and Ceileigh McAllister! https://lnkd.in/gB6rUWhj