The-14’s Post

Loblaws boycott: What consumer psychology can tell us about the success of consumer activism The-14 The Conversation Canada #Canada #Loblaws #FoodPrices #Boycott #CostOfLiving #Activism #GroceryStores #Groceries #LoblawsBoycott #ConsumerPsychology #Inflation #ConsumerBoycotts #Economy 

Tracking Impact of #Boycott - Wave IV Socio-Economic & Age-Group Profile ================================== Pulse Consultant tracking research indicated that ◼ *Socio-Economic Class Wise* - The agreement with the statement of #Boycott is higher among upper-class SEC A (70%) and middle-class SEC-C (72%), and the lowest deal is in the lowest-income class, SEC E (47%) ◼ However, amongst the agreed respondents - the claim of practical boycott is highest amongst upper SECs A (86%), with a gradual decline to SEC E (76%) #Impact: It might be that sales of MNCs are hitting at Modern Trade ◼ *Age-Group Wise*- Age-group wise the agreement with the statement of #Boycott prevails in almost all groups except 55+ years (51% disagreed) ◼ However, in the middle age group (36-45 Years)– the claim of practical implementation is highest, i.e., 91% - The remaining age groups have the claim of 80%+ #Impact: Decision makers of Grocery Items are more active in boycotting Pulse Consultant -Marketing & Social Research Company – Provides reliable insights to its clients. For Further Details Contact: 0346-2738943

Tracking Impact of #Boycott - Wave IV Socio-Economic & Age-Group Profile ========================== Pulse Consultant tracking research indicated that ◼ Socio-Economic Class Wise - The agreement with the statement of #Boycott is higher among upper-class SEC A (70%) and middle-class SEC-C (72%), and the lowest deal is in the lowest-income class, SEC E (47%) ◼ However, amongst the agreed respondents - the claim of practical boycott is highest amongst upper SECs A (86%), with a gradual decline to SEC E (76%) #Impact: It might be that sales of MNCs are hitting at Modern Trade ◼ Age-Group Wise- Age-group wise, the agreement with the statement of #Boycott prevails in almost all groups except 55+ years (51% disagreed) ◼ However, in the middle age group (36-45 Years)– the claim of practical implementation is highest, i.e., 91% - The remaining age groups have the claim of 80%+ #Impact: Decision makers of Grocery Items are more active in boycotting Pulse Consultant -Marketing & Social Research Company – Provides reliable insights to its clients. For Further Details Contact: 0346-2738943

These days, the term "boycott" is being applied to various issues and situations. But what about brand boycotts? The ever-changing world of consumer activism and corporate accountability has given birth to brand boycotts as strong tools to hold companies accountable for their actions. Lately, Bangladesh has also been experiencing various instances of boycotts. Certain brands are experiencing adverse effects, while others are seeing gains. However, brand boycotts, which may range from labor rights abuse to issues pertaining to environmental and immoral practices to social injustices, are usually triggered by matters that resonate with the values and convictions of consumers. To learn more, read ‘Brand Boycott: From Controversies to Coping Strategies Lessons from the Front-lines of Corporate Accountability’ from BBF Digital Click here to read the full article https://lnkd.in/gZPHTJuG  #BBFHighlights

Boycotts: A Double-Edged Sword? Recently, I've been thinking a lot about boycotts and their effectiveness in creating change. On one hand, boycotts can be a powerful tool for consumers to voice their opinions and put pressure on companies to address important issues. When enough people band together and refuse to buy from a business, it can have a real financial impact and force the company to sit up and take notice. But on the flip side, boycotts can also have unintended consequences. Boycotting a company can hurt the livelihoods of its workers, many of whom may not have any say in the policies or actions being protested. Small businesses and local franchises can be hit especially hard, even if they aren't directly involved in the controversy. There's also the question of how effective boycotts really are in the long run. Sure, they might generate a lot of buzz and short-term pressure, but do they lead to lasting, meaningful change? Some argue that engaging with companies and pushing for reform from within can be more impactful than simply refusing to do business with them. At the end of the day, I believe boycotts can be a valid form of protest, but they shouldn't be the only tool in the toolbox. It's important to think critically about the potential impact and to combine boycotts with other forms of activism, like lobbying, shareholder advocacy, and supporting alternative businesses that align with our values. What do you all think? Have you ever participated in a boycott? Did it feel effective? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below! 👇

One for the Far Right / Racists who are causing havoc and spreading Islamaphobia on the streets of Britain Briefly: In recent times we have a all see the effects of boycotting? Starbucks -$8B 📉 McDonalds -11% 📉 - Boycotting works a treat! Here’s a genius one💡 Every time you support something Muslims have created / designed / found - in essence you’re actually appreciating Muslims! Who wants to do that? Have you ever considered boycotting Muslims? - Coffee - First brewed in Yemen around the 9th century. In its earliest days, coffee helped Muslim Sufis stay up during late nights of devotion. Are you really following the Muslim tradition to stay awake? Who needs to feel awake anyway. Once your up, your up. You don’t need anything to wake you up, your up! (Not the right time but guys come on, Wake up!!) - Hospitals - Not worth the 8 hours in A+E from a scrap at the pub after this… The first such medical center was the Ahmad ibn Tulun Hospital, founded in 872 in Cairo - Algebra - let’s be real, who needs this anyway? You just need a saw, Timber and some guesstimates to build a house 🏙 🪚 Here’s and option: build your own tent 🏕 At least the Muslims don’t have a say. - Optics - Your mental vision may be blinded, but your optical vision isn’t worth fixing either! The Muslims thought it would be a good idea to clear the optical vision. 👓 - Toothbrush - If you use one your a lover of The Holy Prophet Mohammed (صلى الله عليه وسلم) your practically a Muslim because he popularised the use of the first toothbrush in around 600. Using a twig from the Meswak tree, he cleaned his teeth and freshened his breath but I see some of you have started the boycotting them for some years, keep it up 👍🏽 - Clothing - Guys this is a no brainer but be carful of where you buy and invest. You don’t want to give them your money! If you don’t boycott them, practically a you’re fan, you like them and want to be like them…. (Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion and I strongly Believe - You will be on your arses within 24 hours of boycotting Muslims 😊)

I love India, and I love to drink Cocacola ! The culture of products boycotting is fascinating. But what is alarming today is the increasing number of campaigns in muslim activity initiated in bad faith, but certainly accelerated by the rise of social media and the evolution of bad consumer values. The consumers deciding to avoid brands are moved by sentimentalism rather than logic and rarely analyze particular actions' morality from different points of view. a supplier for the Indian consumer goods giant Marico faced a chilly reception in Dhaka’s Panthapath area. Grocery shops, usually eager to stock their shelves with its hair oil, cooking oil, body lotions and other products, refused to take new deliveries. India is our one of the good supportive nation. As a Bengali, we should keep thinking about good relations to our neighbour country. International relations play a crucial role in fostering economic development and prosperity across all over the world. Nations engage in trade agreements, investment, partnerships, and economic alliances, which facilitate the flow of goods, services, and capital across borders. Our dumbass social media campaigns prompting a huge bad impression on both country's people. You people are such a dumbass joke. Your boycott isn’t saving, not one life, not even yours. Get a grip of reality, leave people alone. There’s people crying about Cocacola and the Cocacola boycott, but making these posts from an Apple IPHONE & Facebook, those companies also support a genocide. Now, this whole boycotting trend is going overboard and ruining products for everyone else because some groups of people want to feel self-righteous or didn't do enough research. It could be quite stupid for a consumer to devote much thinking to which brands to punish as if we were campaigning with our money. We do not campaign with our money. There might be better ways to use our time and talent to grow as a human being and help our community, concentrate on good deeds and avoid sins to help our societies flourish. If people want to boycott something, go ahead and do it for the right reasons and don't push your beliefs on to other people.

Why Indians Should Boycott McDonald’s: A Heartfelt Plea to Protect Our Sacred Cultural Values As proud Indians, our heritage is steeped in compassion for all living beings, especially cows, which hold a revered place in our hearts and traditions. The cow embodies motherhood, nourishment, and life itself. For countless generations, safeguarding cows has been a cornerstone of Indian culture, reflecting our deep connection to nature and spirituality. With over 33 crore Devi Devta believed to reside within Gau Mata, our reverence for this sacred animal is not just cultural; it is divine. Yet today, many of us unknowingly support businesses that trample on these cherished values. McDonald’s, a global fast-food giant, stands as one of the largest purchasers of beef, profiting from the slaughter of cows—animals that are worshipped by millions across our nation. McDonald’s Profits at the Cost of Our Sacred Beliefs Every burger sold by McDonald’s represents the sacrifice of a cow, a life extinguished for profit. By indulging in their offerings, we inadvertently support an industry that profits from the slaughter of these sacred beings, contradicting the very essence of our beliefs. The Emotional and Spiritual Toll Supporting McDonald’s is not merely an ethical concern; it strikes at the core of our emotional and spiritual identity. Cows, honored in our rituals and traditions, are woven into the fabric of our culture. We must not allow our financial choices to contribute to their suffering and sacrifice. Our Moral Responsibility as Indians It is time for us to rise and take a stand. The convenience offered by McDonald’s should never come at the expense of our sacred values. We must align our actions with our principles, refusing to support businesses that undermine our beliefs. Boycotting McDonald’s is about defending our culture and sending a powerful message to corporations that our values demand respect. United for Our Sacred Values Our rich traditions teach us the strength of unity and collective action. By boycotting McDonald’s, we not only protect the cows but also uphold the values that have guided us for centuries. The cow is more than a mere symbol; it is a living embodiment of our connection to life and divinity. In a world driven by consumerism, let us not forget our roots. Supporting McDonald’s is a betrayal of our heritage and the sacredness we hold dear. Let us stand up for what is sacred, for Gau Mata, and for the future of our culture. If you question the authenticity of this message, I encourage you to conduct your own research or reach out to me directly. In today’s world, we often rely on various sources like ChatGPT for information, and I’ve utilized this video to convey the message. If we are truly committed to opposing "Gau Hatya," let us educate ourselves about the implications of our choices and the companies we support🙏🏻 #ProtectGauMata #CulturalValues #McDonalds #BoycottMcDonalds #SaveTheCows #EthicalChoices

#BoycottMcDonalds #FastFoodWatch #ConsumerPower Hey, everyone! 🌍 Let’s talk about McDonald’s for a moment. There’s a lot of chatter about their role in the class struggle, and honestly, it’s time for us to consider if we should hit them where it hurts. 💔 Here’s why some folks think a **boycott is in order**: Political Connections: McDonald's has a long history of siding with Trump. 🤷♂️ From using him for free advertising to hosting a White House dinner featuring their food, they’ve stayed silent on a lot of issues that matter. Is it too much to expect a major corporation to have a conscience? Legal Shenanigans: Remember the infamous hot coffee case? McDonald’s went full throttle to discredit the poor woman who suffered because of their overheated coffee. ☕😠 This ultimately led to new laws that limit consumers’ rights against corporations. Not cool! Controversial Snitches: They seemed to revel in the publicity when one of their employees ‘snitched’ on a colleague, using dr... Why Should We Unite to Boycott McDonald's for Social Justice? Answers:  https://lnkd.in/gxHHFNHg Let's Connect! Have you faced similar challenges? Share your insights and ...

Will consumers boycott brands over their political stances? A question that is always timely and relevant, but with the US elections coming up in about one month, even more so now. Brands may find themselves in the middle of political controversy through intentional or unintentional actions that have political implications. In the age of social media, this is quite likely to cause a reaction, often a call for a boycott by the opposing side. Our study, co-authored with Joanna Phillips Melancon and Izabela Szczytynski, published in Qualitative Market Research (by Emerald Publishing) in 2023, analyzed boycott calls on social media, by both political leanings. Some of our key takeaways: 1) As seen in the framework we developed, intensity of emotion in people’s posts varies and so does their reason for engaging in the conversation. 2) Our themes were quite consistent, independent of the political leaning of the people writing the posts. 3) Taking a stand with posts on social media is much easier for a consumer than actual behavior in the marketplace (keyboard warriors vs. principled consumers). 4) Boycott conversations on social media involve both boycott defenders and brand defenders. 5) While there seems to be a risk for brands when taking a political stance, there may also be some appeal, especially when the brand’s customer base aligns politically with the brand’s stance. I’d love to see your comments and thoughts. Obviously, the nature of this topic can be quite sensitive and triggering so I am hoping all comments will be respectful and civil.