Taxmann’s Post

View organization page for Taxmann, graphic

157,994 followers

#PMLA #CaseLaw Key Takeaways from Taxmann's Case Digest: • Where an order attaching certain properties of the accused company was passed on 19-1-2015 and ED filed a prosecution complaint on 16-7-2018, an amendment was notified which made ED bound to file a prosecution complaint within 90 days of passing the attachment order • Since, the period of 90 days would commence on the date when the amendment came into force, i.e., 19-4-2018, ED complied with the requirement of filing a prosecution complaint and, thus, the appeal filed against the order confirming the attachment of properties was to be dismissed Case Name: Yashovardhan Birla v. Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Citation: [2024] 162 taxmann.com 428 (SAFEMA-New Delhi) Read the (New Delhi) SAFEMA Order: https://lnkd.in/d7RPtT_w • V. Anandarajan & G.C. Mishra, Member • Mrinal Kumar, Adv. for the Respondent. 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐓𝐚𝐱 & 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐰 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬, 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 '𝐓𝐚𝐱𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐧' 𝐨𝐧 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐬𝐀𝐩𝐩: https://lnkd.in/dXuaSZhc #TaxmannUpdates #MoneyLaundering

ED's prosecution complaint filed within 90 days of the attachment order is valid as per amended Section 8 of PMLA

ED's prosecution complaint filed within 90 days of the attachment order is valid as per amended Section 8 of PMLA

taxmann.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics