Exactly 3 months ago I handed in my letter of withdrawing from teaching at Columbia University. I could no longer teach collaboration when the university didn't know how to bridge across differences.
In its avoidance to describe that the students were protesting the indiscriminate killing of Palestinian civilians by the State of Israel and choosing to describe it instead as students protesting the "humanitarian crisis" in Gaza, the university failed an important rule in collaboration, that is: we don't mince words in describing other people's actions and ideas to make others comfortable. We don't have to agree, but if we are to stay in dialogue we cannot misrepresent other people's opinions to fit our own narrative.
In her resignation letter, Minouche Shafik writes, "Even as tension, division, and politicization have disrupted our campus over the last year, our core mission and values endure and will continue to guide us in meeting the challenges ahead."
In contrast, in my letter I wrote: "My motivation to teach at Columbia stems from a desire to make a positive impact in the world, as the challenges our planet faces today require us to bridge our differences and integrate knowledge from diverse perspectives. That integration of diverse perspectives requires, above all, a capacity for self-reflection and the courage to grow. It requires us to welcome polarization as opposed to trying to oppress it. It is not polarization that has derailed civil discourse; it is the imposition of one voice and the dignity of life for one group of people at the expense of the dignity of life for another that has derailed civility."
I recognized again, as I had three months prior, that my misalignment with Columbia University runs deeper than differences between hierarchical and collaborative mindsets. To me, the tension, the division, the polarization that occurred on campus is part of what makes Columbia what it is. It's part of what makes it so special and why it made me a better human and changed my career goals back in 2015 when I was then a student at MS in Information & Knowledge Strategy (IKNS). The goal is not to impose our values from our own perspective but to hear from the perspective of the other (the many perspectives of many others) diving deeper into a collective understanding of a mismatch between our values and the impact of our actions.
My wish for Columbia University at this moment of crisis is that all leadership, not just the presidency, engages in self-reflection and learns to engage in conversation in a way not to impose the perspective of the few, of the group that holds most power, over the perspective of the many.
In the collective perspective of the many the we will find the path towards the societal transformations we are all craving for.
Minouche Shafik Steps Down as President of Columbia University
https://lnkd.in/ekZQitEf