Suleman Mulla’s Post

View profile for Suleman Mulla, graphic

Tax & Zakat Director - (all views are my own)

Who is liable or responsible for tax reporting and filing in Saudi Arabia? This week’s thought piece starts with an important area impacting stakeholders from a tax and zakat perspective in KSA i.e. managing risk and liability given the unique and complex nature of interplay between the basis on which corporate tax and zakat are determined. A few questions are then raised with regard to other taxes in KSA, giving room for thought and negotiation in certain cases. From a corporate income tax and zakat perspective, in addition to ensuring compliance with IFRS, a company in KSA as a legal entity is responsible and liable for the relevant tax or zakat as applicable. This situation may create some challenges where a joint venture between Saudi /GCC and non-Saudi/GCC shareholders are involved. Accordingly, proper accounting, clarification in relevant shareholder agreements ensures that any tax and zakat liabilities and reporting responsibilities are properly managed. What happens in the case of a 100% Saudi/GCC owned company subject to Zakat only or 100% non-Saudi/GCC owned entities subject to corporate income tax only, one would assume that full disclosure directly on the income statement should be fine? Moving on to a mixed company (50% Saudi and 50% Foreign/Non-Saudi) involving a split between tax and zakat. Will the disclosure of such liability directly on the income statement appear reasonable and in line with IFRS? Or should reflection as part of owner’s equity be a more accurate indication of the ultimate shareholder tax/zakat liability. Can a corporate tax equalization arrangement be enforceable? What happens in case of a Fund, Partnership or Consortium in KSA? Will submission of an information tax return suffice, or could tax filing and reporting obligation be imposed on managers, members or partners? The tax reporting and filing dilemma gets more interesting, where a change of shareholding, exit or sale? Who will be responsible for the reporting to the tax authorities and filing of a capital gains tax return, buyer or seller? The withholding tax conundrum. What if there a permanent establishment, is the paying entity still obliged to withhold tax. The KSA paying entity is responsible to report and settle amounts to tax authority within a specific time frame. Is there a risk of joint liability in case of non-compliance? What happens when paying entity and recipient agree to a gross up or net basis of tax clause? Is there a reporting requirement when a payment is not subject to WHT or in case where a tax treaty provides for relief? The commercial drivers and numerous tax and legal related challenges which may arise and create concerns, requires that any arrangements or agreements are carefully drafted to ensure that any potential primary or secondary tax liabilities, including delay fines and penalties are appropriately addressed in KSA.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Yeeshu Sehgal, CA

AKM Global | International Tax | UAE Tax | Corporate Tax | M&A Tax | Business Setup | Harvard Delegate'21 | Speaker | DIIT ICAI |

5mo

Very Insightful. I noticed voluntary zakat payments in UAE company financial statements. While it may be true that such payments are not tax-deductible in the UAE, I believe the situation is likely different in Saudi Arabia, given the religious and cultural significance of zakat in KSA, and its integration into the tax regime. Another thing is some confusion about withholding tax on service fees between UAE and KSA, even with the tax treaty. While the treaty might not specifically mention service fees, it should prevent withholding because of the treaty relief it offers. However, I've heard that getting this treaty relief in KSA takes time, so companies often take a conservative view and withhold the tax anyway. Is that right?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics