Car ads don't always need cars. A while back, Jaguar Canada dealers wanted to run a small space newspaper ad to introduce their new XJ sedan with a V8 engine. The team of Mike Kirkland,Tom Scharpf, and Marcus Sagar showed me some ads with clever headlines above a big photo of the car. I asked them to think about demonstrating power visually and reminded them that the XJ8 looks exactly like the XJ6, and that the "Jaguar Leaper" was one of the world's most recognizable brand icons. They did and Ogilvy (Toronto) won two Cannes Lions. (Newspaper and poster.) Brand equity, history, and love should be leveraged not discarded in a rebrand. But, instead of a creative execution that lives up to Jaguar's brand equites of "exuberant, mold breaking, vivid, and out of the ordinary," they got a Jean-Paul Goude rip-off that I've seen for everything from worn out retail stores to declining casinos to fading fashion brands. Instead of a rebrand, Jaguar got a re-bland. Now it's up to Jaguar to introduce actual vehicles that truly re-define the brand and demonstrate a forward leap.
The problem with the new logo is not the new font. It’s the elimination of the iconic Jaguar icon.
You're correct. Car ads don't need cars. But if you have a beautiful car there would have to be a pretty strong reason not to show it. For one fine day the person who is going to pay thousands of dollars for that car will want to see it.......Usually clients and agencies who don't show cars in car ads do so because the user imagery or usage imagery is more interesting than the vehicle. In short, the car doesn't look that good. It's not much more difficult than this. Demonstrate your strengths. Hide your weaknesses. Sell the product. It's not about awards. Or is it?
I think Jaguar wanted to create a stir but had nothing to say. It is an expensive car with a long history of unreliability and is about to go all electric, which nobody wants.
Excellent points Steve—a thoughtful post. I agree like many others on this launch and that it’s off the mark. Interesting to note in my opinion, it’s not throwing out the rules or disrupting that is wrong, it worked brilliantly for Apple in 1984, not showing a computer. But conversely as an executive said at Infiniti, when they first launched, showing rocks and waterfalls for too long without a car was a mistake. That’s why what we do isn’t easy. Part science, part art.
Et le monde n'a plus besoin de pub de voiture :-/
The video is some of the worst crap i have ever seen.
Nicely efficient and simple visual. But wonder the line could’ve been more smartly aligned and did it even need to mention Jaguar? Maybe it would’ve sufficed just to sign off this visual with “The New XJS wants a test drive” (launch date optional).
I can't stand the re-bland, it's tacky, boring and like you say Steve Landsberg so over used. However...as a marketing campaign, it's fantastic. I've never heard Jaguar mentioned so much in the last 20 years combined. Everyone has an opinion, and they are the talk of the town. A real opportunity now for Jaguar to release a car worth talking about, and capitalize on their current fame/infamy.
I'm thinking in the same direction as you. SO FAR I can only tell I kinda like the logo, kinda like the colors, and kinda dislike the "fake futuristic blasé" vibe of the video. But that's all. If Jaguar comes up with really innovative cars, disrupts their targets, reinvent something (and I'm talking about this, because that's the promise I get from the rebranding), it's all very justified. If not, it can feel like a limp balloon. To be continued.
Leadership is more than just giving orders.
6dHmm l like your photo. Maybe they can do an ad about letting the Jaguar inside you Free. Seems like there are a lot of "penned up emotions" on this ad.