One of the common metrics that is part of the dialogue related to recruiting and attraction capabilities. Find the balance between executing with speed, the candidate experience but also taking the time to assess is always a challenge.
Time to fill shouldn’t be a one-size-fits-all metric. Factors like industry, location, and the level of expertise required can significantly influence how long it takes to fill a role. The real game-changer is alignment between hiring managers and recruiters. When they’re on the same page and engaged, the process becomes more efficient, and TTF is both reasonable and as quick as possible.
I like to measure speed to attract, the assessment process will vary depending on a lot of factors- but your ability to get the right message to the right audience in the right medium that drives action should be measured.
Global Cloud Operations Executive | Driving Cloud Strategy | Building High-Performing Teams | Delivering Operational Excellence | Cost Optimization | Digital Transformation | Sourdough Enthusiast
2wBalancing speed and thorough assessment in recruiting is a real challenge. Metrics like "time to hire" and "time to fill" are important, but they only tell part of the story. The candidate experience and quality of hire matter just as much. A quick process can backfire if the wrong candidate is chosen, while delays risk losing top talent. Finding the right balance means adapting to cultural and market differences—such as varying notice periods—and maintaining a structured yet flexible evaluation process. In the end, the goal is to optimize efficiency without sacrificing the quality of the hire or the experience.