Sevinc O. B.’s Post

Remove HR from the compensation review process. No to spreadsheets. All base, short and long term, special bonus decisions and distribution is handled through a system of records Get rid of pay structures instead market price each jobs and show pay to market Geo Differentials to be updated on annual basis Remove recruiters authority over compensation review, offers and hires Get rid of early career pay practices Prerequisites: Endure Job Architectural design and implementation is in place. Job analysis and job descriptions are written by Compensation professionals working with lower management and not C - Suite. Market pricing is done by Compensation professionals and not data analytics team All offers approved by Compensation professionals and not Talent team Legal review on offers and people movement Have a external third party platform maintenance of Market Pricing

View profile for Lola Han, graphic

CEO & Founder @ Kamsa | Compensation Thought Leader

Years ago, I was working with a company on navigating their first Compensation Review cycle. After gathering proposed salary increases from leaders, it was time to review them with the CEO. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘯, 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥. The CEO requested the salary increases to be sorted from 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗲𝘀𝘁 % 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁, focusing on the higher increases. As we went through each employee, I noticed a few 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘁𝗹𝗲 yet 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀: 1️⃣ The CEO probed longer and asked more questions about salary increases for a certain gender category. 2️⃣ Promotions for employees who started in lower level positions drew extra attention (e.g., when reviewing an employee's increase, the CEO said, “I remember when X started as an Associate just a few years ago”) 3️⃣ If an employee had received a high increase before, the CEO was more hesitant in approving another high increase even though they were a high performer and/or paid below market. These actions weren't intentional or malicious — they were unconscious but, they were biases nonetheless. Perhaps the CEO simply had more interactions with certain group of employees vs. others, or maybe there was a subconscious bias about rapid promotions from junior roles. Regardless, below are 3 strategies I've found highly effective for reducing unconscious bias when making pay decisions: 🔢 𝗦𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Implement a salary matrix (example below) that anchors salary increases to predefined metrics (e.g., compa-ratio & performance rating). This structure encourages consistency and fairness, preventing arbitrary decisions from creeping in. 📚 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 Make sure managers understand the company’s compensation philosophy. Train them to evaluate compensation based on objective factors like performance, contribution, and market data, rather than personal anecdotes or perceptions. ✴ 𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘄/ 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗗𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 Provide leaders with various data points like market benchmarks, internal salary comparisons, and employee performance. However, too much data can result in analysis paralysis. I’d love to hear from other HR, comp and business leaders: What strategies have worked for your organization to minimize unconscious bias in pay decisions?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics