Emin Sadiyev’s Post

🚀 Ever wondered if AI can truly "think" like humans? 🧠 Yann LeCun, a pioneer in AI, sheds light on this intriguing question! LeCun explains that current Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at tasks that require instinctive, automatic responses—what he calls System One thinking. Examples include simple pattern recognition and routine tasks. However, when it comes to System Two reasoning—tasks that require deliberate, planned thought—LLMs fall short. These include complex decision-making and strategic planning, where a deeper understanding and more thoughtful consideration are needed. The current models predict the next word in a sequence, which works well for generating text but lacks the depth needed for true reasoning. They are not capable of advanced planning or optimizing their answers in an abstract, meaningful way. LeCun envisions future AI systems overcoming these limitations through energy-based models. These models will measure how well an answer fits a prompt, optimizing responses efficiently and thoughtfully. This approach promises a significant leap forward in making AI more capable of reasoning like humans. 🌟 Curious about AI's capabilities and limitations? Watch the video and join the conversation!

Can LLMs reason? | Yann LeCun and Lex Fridman

https://www.youtube.com/

Godwin Josh

Co-Founder of Altrosyn and DIrector at CDTECH | Inventor | Manufacturer

6mo

LeCun's insights on AI's current capabilities resonate with past advancements in technology, reminiscent of early computer systems' limitations in complex reasoning tasks. As we navigate AI's journey, paralleling it with historical leaps, what advancements in energy-based models do you foresee to bridge the gap between System One and System Two thinking in AI, particularly in domains requiring nuanced decision-making and strategic planning?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics