📚 Reflections on The Conservative Environmentalist by Benjamin (Benji) Backer I recently finished The Conservative Environmentalist by Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition. The book offers a conservative perspective on how to address the climate crisis focusing on free markets and local solutions. A few takeaways: 1. Climate conversations suffer from polarized language and the attribution of ill intent As I read, I was struck by how politicized our language has become. Backer expressed ideas I factually agree with, but the language he used felt threatening. He also framed the problems with some progressive environmental policies—like the lack of transmission lines hindering renewable energy—as as intentional or at least negligent failures of the policy, while the media I usually consume frames these drawbacks as problems to be managed. (Political attribution bias) 2. Regulations can have unintended consequences Backer’s discussion of how well-intentioned regulations can backfire was eye opening. I had never heard of the “Shoot, Shovel, & Shut Up” phenomenon: landowners, frustrated with restrictions tied to endangered species, kill those species before they are discovered on their land to avoid burdensome regulation. This example helped me understand how regulation can create perverse incentives, especially for people who already distrust government intervention. 3. Local input can avoid unintended outcomes and tailor solutions The belief that local solutions to reducing emissions and increasing climate resilience are more effective and easier to implement than top down or one-size-fits-all solutions has been a theme in what I have been reading lately. Backer emphasizes this, especially with regard to rural communities. 4. What role can we trust fossil fuel companies play in the energy transition? Backer argues that fossil fuels—and fossil fuel companies—must play a role in for a successful energy transition. In particular, he states that American oil is cleaner than foreign, so increased American production (if it prevents consuming dirty foreign oil) is a good thing. He does not address the question of how fossil fuel companies can be trusted as partners after decades of deception about their climate impacts. I'd also be curious about his position on fossil fuel subsidies. This is definitely worth a read, especially if this is a perspective not typically expressed in your media bubble. I appreciate Backer's work to depolarize environmental action and wonder if he and others like him might have a particular important role to play in maintaining climate progress in the US over the next four years. What books have challenged your thinking recently? I'd love your recommendations! #DIYclimateEducation
Samara Watkiss’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
The recent U.S. election marks another win for climate deregulation; and with it, an intensifying race toward environmental erosion. But this isn’t just an American story. In Argentina, we’re witnessing a similar dismantling of environmental protections under Javier Milei’s administration. My latest piece in Drilled Media explores the alarming parallels between Milei’s policies and Trump’s playbook: stripping regulations under the guise of “freedom” and “efficiency,” yet sidestepping the long-term consequences for communities and ecosystems. From Argentina to the U.S., climate denialism in policy means setting the stage for worsened water crises, toxic air, biodiversity loss, and a total breakdown in the safeguards that protect our landscapes and health. The consequences of environmental breakdown won’t be confined to any one border or institution. While leaders may deny or downplay climate realities, it’s on each of us to recognize the urgency and push for action, no matter the political winds.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“Direct air capture” is such a stupid distraction. Efficnecy, renewables, batteries, & reforestation. That’s the “all of the above” that we need to be focusing on.
Stanford U Professor-Civil & Environ Eng, Director-Atmos/Energy Program; Co-founder-Solutions Project & 100% Movement; Testified Held v Montana & Navahine v Hawai’i
"There are many solutions that are just not helpful at all, that do not help an iota for climate and don’t help an iota for air pollution," (Jacobson) said. "Among these are direct air capture” The New York Times “This is a new wave of denial, deception and delay,” said Lili Fuhr, director of the fossil economy program at the Center for International Environmental Law. Can We Engineer Our Way Out of Climate Crisis? https://lnkd.in/gKDi7cHF
Can We Engineer Our Way Out of the Climate Crisis?
https://www.nytimes.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Increasingly, climate change and environmental challenges are bringing the perspectives of younger generations to the fore, as well as the consideration of how future generations will be affected by decisions. 💬📢 Join our discussion on Wednesday 2nd October to find out more about future generations, young environmental voices, and their relationship with environmental science: https://lnkd.in/ewCFRe5u
IES Webinar: Future generations & young voices for the environment
the-ies.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Donald Trump's climate policy as the 45th President of the United States was controversial and aimed at prioritizing economic interests over environmental initiatives. EcoPolitic tried to figure out what steps Trump will take in the field of environmental policy after taking office, based on his actions in the previous term👇🏻 #ecopolitic #ecology #environment #temperatures #climatechange #climate #globalwarming #warming #ecosystems #nature #ocean #weather #air #atmosphere #sea #emissions #carbon #CO2 #USA #atmosphere #pollution
Trump's climate policy as newly elected US President: what to expect
ecopolitic.com.ua
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Climate action isn’t niche. Suggesting otherwise is undemocratic. ⚖️ ⚖️ Last week, Yvonne Hofs wrote two stories for de Volkskrant just a couple of hours apart, the first analysing the newly sworn in government coalition's plan to prevent advocacy organisations “of an ideal nature” from suing the Dutch government because they don't represent the views of the Dutch public. The second announced an independent review of the plan by the Raad voor de leefomgeving en infrastructuur (Rli) had concluded that the government owes such lawsuits to itself for failing to fulfil its own agreements. In the week since these stories came out, many other news pieces have been written about how such a proposal is a dangerous attack on #democracy and how it obstructs justice. From our perspective as environmental psychologists, what has not yet been said enough is that #climateaction is very much representative of people’s values and concerns. The stated logic behind the proposal is that idealistic organizations like climate action groups are somehow a niche interest, insinuating that they are not broadly socially relevant and only reflect the beliefs of a small group. The suggestion that groups advocating for faster climate action are on the fringes of society is completely false. Many people, worldwide and in the #Netherlands, are concerned about the consequences of climate change, not only in the future, but right here, right now. https://lnkd.in/eCZEbmR8
Climate action isn’t niche. Suggesting otherwise is undemocratic.
https://epgroningen.nl
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What's in a name? When you're talking about terms like ‘transition’, ‘resilience’ or ‘clean energy’, it's easy to get confused. 🤔 Dr Paul Merchant and Prof Daniela Schmidt want to tackle misunderstandings around key terms. Their research (below) shows that including community groups and businesses in developing climate policy is crucial. Cabot Institute for the Environment #sustainability #research #policy https://lnkd.in/eRw2s9b9
Environmental Policy: Involving Communities is Crucial
bristol.ac.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I often compare climate change to a bar fight. you need to use every possible tool at your disposal; nothing can be dismissed as a possible weapon or solution to the problem. You need to try the broken bottle; the table flip; the pitcher-beer-spray chaos creation; the noise making as confuser. That's why I've hung in with the sketchy and problematic work of corporate sustainbility. Yeah, it's mostly a failure, but we can't dismiss that tool. (Yet.) We need everything. Similarly, we need to keep trying weird things, things people tell us will fail, new things, and methods that have been dismissed but make sense. One is the legal system. As Oreskes Naomi and colleagues shows with her new research, actually, Mass. V. EPA was decided correctly by the Supreme Court. (Historical note: Aspen One was the only outdoor industry business to file an Amicus brief in support.) In fact, congress HAD intended to address carbon dioxide pollution. And so when the current corrupt court weakened that decision in W. Virgina vs. EPA, it was doing what it always does: ignoring history, precedent, factual evidence, and making its own ideological decision based on evidence that suits its needs. Them is bar fighting tactics. So we need to respond in kind. And showing, through historical record, that indeed Congress was worried about climate change and carbon dioxide in the 60s, as they were designing the Clean Air Act, is an important tool that puts the lie to the Roberts court and adds another arrow to the quiver, for use now or at a later date. Which is to say, Bravo to Naomi and co for this grinding, difficult, slipperyand intellectually violent work. https://lnkd.in/gkkReFd3
The lost history of what Americans knew about climate change in the 1960s
grist.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If it's Monday, it's time for good climate news! 🌈 Swipe to see our top picks of the week and let us know your favourite in the comments! 👇 🌳 EU states push past opposition to adopt landmark nature restoration law The European Union has successfully passed a landmark nature restoration law, setting legally binding targets to revitalize at least 20% of the EU’s land and sea by 2030. This significant move demonstrates the power of international cooperation in tackling environmental challenges. Despite opposition from several member states, the law’s passage marks a major step forward in preserving and restoring natural habitats, mitigating climate change, and enhancing biodiversity. Read more: https://lnkd.in/d9gZRZEb 🏗️ Scientists make breakthrough in recycling old concrete Cambridge researchers have developed a breakthrough method to recycle old concrete into new cement using the steelmaking process, potentially revolutionizing the construction industry. This innovative technique, called Cambridge Electric Cement, not only reduces the amount of new concrete needed but also significantly cuts air pollution from the cement and steel industries, which together account for 15% of global emissions. Read more: https://lnkd.in/dt_tPiqA ❤️🩹 In 4 years, renewable energy has yielded $250B in health & climate benefits in the US In the past four years, the rise of renewable energy in the US has generated $250 billion in health and climate benefits, according to a new study. The increased use of wind and solar power has significantly cut emissions, improved air quality, and delivered substantial health gains. By avoiding 915 million tonnes of CO2 emissions and removing harmful pollutants from the atmosphere, renewable energy is helping to mitigate climate change and reduce the risk of respiratory illnesses. Read more: https://lnkd.in/drQC7Jzb 💪 Activists win landmark ruling over UK oil well plan The UK's highest court has ruled that planning authorities must consider the climate impact of emissions when approving fossil fuel projects. This landmark decision, resulting from activists challenging an oil well plan near Gatwick Airport, sets a precedent that could hinder future oil, gas, and coal developments in Britain. The ruling is seen as a significant victory for environmental campaigners and a critical step towards meeting climate targets by reducing fossil fuel extraction. Read more: https://lnkd.in/d3Da7WFc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Regarding Project 2025, the “personnel scatter” mentioned in the article would also be driven in part by “Schedule F”, which would turn thousands of jobs currently operating under significant civil service protections into “at-will” positions. These traditionally independent offices would now be subject to the whims of whomever occupies the Oval Office. As someone recently pointed out to me, this would result in the Federal government operating as a massive Sheriff’s department. Decisions would no longer be made based on concrete information without giving ear to what The Boss thinks, at least not by anyone desiring to keep their job. The article focuses on environmental impacts, but let’s also consider the national security challenges this would create in the cyber sector. Combating foreign disinformation when it benefits the sitting administration? That’s over. Denying claims of election fraud and vote tampering, even when no forensic evidence suggests such actions took place? Nope. Make it even more difficult to recruit qualified professionals away from the private sector? Absolutely. How else could Project 2025 disrupt the effective defense of the American cyber landscape? #cybersecurity #cyber
Tracking emissions, managing pollutants, responding to natural disasters—even accurately predicting the weather—would all be trampled in a wave of privatization, deregulation, and unfettered fossil-fuel exploitation. Project 2025 will propel America into environmental disaster.
Project 2025 Wants to Propel America Into Environmental Catastrophe
wired.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
IN THE NEWS: Carbon Removals vs Reductions Misses the Moment Have you seen Mary Grady, ACR’s Executive Director column in Environmental Finance? “When you’re in a hole, the first rule is to stop digging. Today, the world finds itself in a climate hole, yet we dig ourselves deeper by continuing to emit climate-changing gases into the atmosphere.” Keep reading more in our republished version here: https://lnkd.in/eDiMQwWD
Carbon Removals vs Reductions Misses the Moment - ACR
https://acrcarbon.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
Innovation | Strategy | Talent | Board Member | Startup Advisor | CPO | Design Thinking | Org Design | Keynote Speaker, Coach, Facilitator | F500 Management Consultant | ex-Microsoft, ex-frog
1moApocalypse Never by Michael Shellenberger might be a good next read for you. Hi Samara Watkiss ! :)