Climate change and its effects are increasingly impacting displaced people’s lives. Often coupled with an enduring lack of rights, assistance, and legal frameworks, climate hazards restrict the ability of displaced people to become self-reliant. The RSRI Climate Risks and Self-Reliance Technical Working Group (TWG), facilitated by Evan Easton-Calabria, presents 10 key considerations to advance the conversation on good practices, gaps, and changes needed in self-reliance programming to better address the current and future risks that climate change poses for displaced people. 📰 Read the full brief: https://buff.ly/4fvL5YR
Refugee Self-Reliance Initiative’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Knowledge Gaps and Policy Needs to Tackle Loss and Damage This issue of the WASP policy brief discusses the foundation on multiple dimensions of the #loss and #damage, which is induced by inadequate action on #climatechange. It seeks to answer the following questions: - What is the current state of knowledge and recognition of loss and damage in national policy? - What are the key science gaps obstructing the effective implementation climate related loss and damage measures? - What are the policy gaps and possible mechanisms to better address observed and projected loss and damage? https://lnkd.in/eQetJa45
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The 𝗥𝗲𝗦𝗔𝗞𝗦𝗦 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟰 𝗔𝗻𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘂𝘁𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 (𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥) is now available! This report highlights the necessity for an integrated policy approach to address and reverse the impacts of climate change. In analyzing the projected effects of climate change on African agriculture from now until 2050, the authors advocate for policies and investments that offer farmers diverse adaptation options, mitigate risks, and enhance productivity across various climate scenarios. Strategies must prioritize risk reduction, especially in high-risk areas, and strengthen capacities to translate strategic decisions into actionable steps. Download the Report: https://lnkd.in/eS6V-78n
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Useful for thinking about the implications of today's US vote. Also in light of today's political developments in Germany. (A deluge of a day). Btw, is the UK now the only remaining major western government that's left-liberal and not facing imminent elections, and thus, de facto, the west's climate torch bearer...? (Dear compatriots: this is the time to step up). Climate Change Committee Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (European Climate Foundation)
Project Leader/Research Associate at German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) & Adjunct Assistant Professor at Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University
A few months ago I led the SWP Climate Policy & Politics Cluster through a #foresight exercise that resulted in 3 international #climate policy scenarios for 2030, 2 of which contained a #Trump win in 2024. In light of last night's developments, it may be worthwhile looking into the paper again: https://lnkd.in/eznGbTY6 Ole Adolphsen Oliver Geden Jule Könneke Felix Schenuit Sonja Thielges Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Useful analysis. Reminds me of one I analysed back in 2009, looking at three different scenarios - ranging from Copenhagen success with minimised further damage to climate and booming renewable sector, to failure, with severe climate breakdown perhaps some ongoing economic benefit from tech sales and carbon market, and intermediate - breakdown in negotiations followed by later progress after shocking impacts finally drive action but with plenty of lasting, irreversible damage. In the event we got the intermediate, but even that could be optimistic post-Trump and risks from feedbacks. Sadly I can't recall the paper reference, and my editor spiked my piece, probably as too pessimistic ahead of Copenhagen (ironically). It feels like we've come full circle, despite all the progress and better scientific and predictive understanding between. The incredible thing is the ongoing cognitive dissonance, embracing further fossil fuel expansion despite drastically increased extreme weather events and abundant science on attribution. History repeats itself for those of use around long enough to see it, with a large helping hand from oil and gas lobbyists and their apologists of course.
Project Leader/Research Associate at German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) & Adjunct Assistant Professor at Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University
A few months ago I led the SWP Climate Policy & Politics Cluster through a #foresight exercise that resulted in 3 international #climate policy scenarios for 2030, 2 of which contained a #Trump win in 2024. In light of last night's developments, it may be worthwhile looking into the paper again: https://lnkd.in/eznGbTY6 Ole Adolphsen Oliver Geden Jule Könneke Felix Schenuit Sonja Thielges Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
ReSAKSS 2024 ATOR! The report underscores the need for an integrated policy approach to mitigate and reverse the adverse effects of climate change. In their analysis of the likely impact of climate change on African agriculture between present day and 2050, the authors argue that the best policies and investments will be those that give farmers multiple options for adaptation, reduce risk, or increase productivity over a wide range of climate outcomes. Strategies should focus on reducing risk, especially in areas where the risk is known to be high. Crucially, the continent must build capacities to translate strategic choices and agendas into action. Learn more: https://shorturl.at/UT7Hf
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The way climate risks are represented shapes our response. To better understand climate impacts it is important to: 1) consider the non-climate factors that shape risk (e.g. housing access, health policies, colonial legacies); and 2) ground the analysis in local experience and Indigenous Knowledge. Our new paper in Nature Portfolio outlines how risk assessments can better integrate and depict the complex relationships between people and climate. https://lnkd.in/g4yhr8NE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
***UPDATE ON CONFLICT AND FRAGILITY IN NEW NCQG TEXT*** The latest #NCQG negotiating text released this morning (21 Nov) retains the language of #conflict and #fragility, recognising these countries' distinct challenges in climate action but the formulation has been significantly weakened: -Fewer mentions from 6 to 2 -No mention of their needs -Text retained in the Access section, Para 44, but bracketed (not agreed). Also less forceful verb used, from 'urges' to 'encourages' -'Conflict' text retained in para 45 on capacity constraints to access climate finance, focusing on communities. Retained same verb, Emphasizes
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌍 Polycentric Climate Governance (PCG) is widely discussed, but how effective is it in practice? A new special issue explores the realities of PCG, analyzing diverse systems across governance levels, policy styles, and actors. 🔑Key themes include: - Operationalization of PCG systems - Voluntary action and its impact - Temporality and adaptability - Power dynamics - Effectiveness in mitigating climate change ✨ This issue highlights both the potential and limitations of PCG, offering insights for future research and policymaking. 📖 Edited by: Paul Tobin, Dave Huitema, and Elke Kellner Read more 👉 https://lnkd.in/eNeMQYBZ #ClimateGovernance #ClimateAction #PolicyResearch
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌍 Polycentric Climate Governance (PCG) is widely discussed, but how effective is it in practice? A new special issue explores the realities of PCG, analyzing diverse systems across governance levels, policy styles, and actors. 🔑Key themes include: - Operationalization of PCG systems - Voluntary action and its impact - Temporality and adaptability - Power dynamics - Effectiveness in mitigating climate change ✨ This issue highlights both the potential and limitations of PCG, offering insights for future research and policymaking. 📖 Edited by: Paul Tobin, Dave Huitema, and Elke K. Read more 👉 https://lnkd.in/eNeMQYBZ #ClimateGovernance #ClimateAction #PolicyResearch
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
How can governments and others adapt to climate change in an effective and fair way? That’s the main goal for newly appointed professor Robbert Biesbroek 🎓🌱 Governments, businesses, and civil society organizations all have to act to ensure they adapt to climate risks. A big congratulations for newly appointed professor Robbert Biesbroek (Public Administration and Policy Group @WUR) who will investigate if, when and how adaptation is (not) taking place across the globe. Do you want to know more about professor Biesbroek’s goals and expertise? Read the article below 🔽 https://lnkd.in/gvrUa6Jh
To view or add a comment, sign in
2,414 followers