I rarely do reposts but think that this is relevant.
Peter Higgs, who won a Nobel Prize in physics for his discovery of the Higgs Boson particle, passed away recently at age 94.
He mentioned to The Guardian below that he wouldn't have gotten an academic job in the academic climate in the 2010's since he wasn't seen as "productive" enough.
In fact, he recalled being seen as an embarrassment at work when he had no publications to report during research assessment exercises.
More importantly, he also felt that he wouldn't have enough peace and quiet to have discovered in the Higgs Boson particle in the academic climate in the early 2010's
Unfortunately, if things were bad in 2013, it ain't any better in 2024.
I think more places in the West, especially, are trying to recognize research with impact, and not just reward people with massive numbers of publications.
Don't get me wrong, journal publications have a major place in academia.
But I wonder what am I doing wrong when I manage to only publish 2 or 3 papers in a year, while others publish 40, 50 or even more than a 100 papers per annum! 🤯
More importantly, can you adequately contribute to each and every paper to warrant authorship on the journal article? 🤷♂️
I don't know. 🤔
You be the judge.
#academia #publication #higgs #integrity
As Nobel Prize winner Peter Higgs passes away, we remember how he would have been considered unproductive by today's standards.
The legacy of a scientist is not the number of papers they publish or their h-index. In the end, they are known for their contribution to science and the quality of their work. In that sense, Peter Higgs achieved immortality.
May his humble soul rest in peace.
Source for the picture (The Guardian) : https://lnkd.in/gTM264yJ
Machine Learning Engineering Leader | AI & Data Science Expert | Software Engineer | Mentor | Driven Problem-Solver | Can-Do Attitude
1moThat's really cool Ravid! Use it to open doors to tackle noble worthy causes. I wish you the best!