You do not get a high score because your instructor has one. Yet, most GMAT instructors tout their GMAT scores. Many tout the number of students they have taught. Having hired 50+ instructors - many of them with (much) better than 99th percentile scores, I can tell you that there is little correlation between an instructor's GMAT score and their ability to impart that knowledge. The question boils down to - what is the one job that a good GMAT instructor has. The simple answer - to ensure that your students have a solid thought process to answer questions. This means that a good instructor should be excellent at "diagnosing" where and why the student goes wrong. Once you make a diagnosis, a good instructor should be able to create a learning path that starts at the right point and builds the right thought process in the mind of the student. When it comes to Quant, I am "not" the best instructor. Why.. because it comes naturally to me. You give me a maths question and I can see through numbers and get to the answer without explicitly working the problem out. Consequently, I am "really bad" at diagnosing where someone's thought process is breaking down. This is one reason I do not (am not allowed to, either) take Quant Live Sessions. The few live sessions that I have taken are ones that Payal first curates, and then trains me on. In many instances, she reviews the recording and gives me feedback. Bottom line: When it comes to choosing a course (any learning course, not just the GMAT) or an instructor. You do not get a high score because your instructor has one. You only get a high score when you build the required skills. So.. ask this question: Does this instructor have the capability of diagnosing why you have gone wrong and are they able to prove to you how they will build this skill. What data points (validation) do they provide to prove you are learning. Have they broken the problem into skills that you need to build. Once you find the right instructor, just immerse yourself and enjoy the process of learning.
Rajat, you make some really good points. I couldn’t agree more with the statement that a good instructor is one who can diagnose the ‘why’s’. However, I believe that being naturally good at quant doesn’t consequently make you ‘really bad’ at diagnosing someone’s quant issues; probably something else does. I’m naturally good with numbers too, but I’m equally good at identifying gaps in a student’s reasoning and understanding of basic concepts. I agree that there’s more to being a really good GMAT teacher than just a good score, but, in my opinion, you understate the correlation between having a great GMAT Score and having the ability to impart knowledge. For someone to impart the knowledge, they must first possess it, and a 99th percentile score is reliable marker in that context.
You don’t need to have a heart attack to be a cardiac surgeon.
Yup, most of our M7 admits have worked with consultants who aren't from M7 schools. And damn, what an intense look that is in the pic! I get the feeling you are dissecting my thought process right through the screen.
Very valid point. Tendulkar's or Kohli's coach, werent batting legends themselves right. Teaching is an entirely different skillset.
Valid point Rajat Sadana.At times, I struggled to convince a lot of test takers that a person having a top GMAT score may not have the required skills to become a top GMAT coach. I will use these points now. Thanks.
Valid point!
Hard agree. I like using the example of football. A Zidane (great player and great coach) is usually the exception; there are many great players who did not become great coaches. On the other hand, Sir Alex and Mourinho were not particularly awesome players, but excellent coaches. Very often, I think that the best players are not the absolute best coaches. Thanks for sharing, Rajat.
I loved reading this. While the world of test prepping is not my domain, I've always intuitively felt that being a phenomenal test taker doesn't correlate with being a good instructor. I might need to bookmark this post for future reference! It would come in handy when candidates discuss such choices with me.
Jasmine Jain check this!
Payal Tandon Chiranjeev Singh Dhairya Gangwani Harshavardhan R Abhishek Raj Petia Whitmore Candy Lee La Balle Shweta Koshija Abhinav Puri Sameer Kamat - MBA Crystal Ball Atul Kumar Linda Abraham Debaion Roy Seema Parakkat Arun Jagannathan Prashant Tibrewal - what do you think!