The TRIGGER Project Pillars! Let's go over the second one: Results Integration The usefulness of the TRIGGER project doesn't solely rely on its individual results. It also depends on the future usability of the project's insights for other investigations, a more informed and resourceful society, or meaningful changes from the political side. An OPEN Science perspective fuels us, always seeking integration and usability of research results. Want to learn more? Stay right here.
TRIGGER EU Project’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
DORA Idea 💡 for Action: Refine #ResearchAssessment through iterative feedback. This might look like crafting both short and long-term goals for new policies and practices to measure success. More ideas: 👇 https://lnkd.in/g365ur-H
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Why does research feel so impossible sometimes? I’ve spent the last eight years building www.r3ciprocity.com to change that. This platform is designed to help anyone, at any stage, create research papers that are practically rejection-proof. The struggles we face in academia today shouldn’t exist—and together, we can fix them. Make your research journey easier. Start today.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Are you a doctoral candidate embarking on qualitative studies but feeling unsure about crucial stages such as coding, theme development, triangulation, and defense proposal review? Don't let uncertainty hinder your progress. I'm here to provide expert guidance and support every step of the way. As a seasoned professional in qualitative research, I understand the challenges that doctoral candidates face during their academic journey. I offer personalized assistance tailored to your specific needs and goals. Whether you're struggling with coding complexities, grappling with theme development, seeking to strengthen your triangulation methods, or preparing for your defense proposal review, I can provide invaluable insights and assistance to help you overcome obstacles and achieve success. Additionally, I offer personalized coaching sessions to help you select a topic that aligns with your interests, expertise, and academic aspirations. Save valuable time deliberating on potential research topics. Let me guide you through the process and ensure that you choose a topic that not only excites you but also holds significant academic merit. To take advantage of my expertise and support, simply send an email to [email protected]. I'm eager to collaborate with you and help you realize your dream of completing your doctoral studies with confidence and excellence. I look forward to hearing from you and embarking on this transformative journey together.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I'll scratch your back, you scratch mine? Infinity loop? 🔻 Springer Nature News Article here 👉 https://lnkd.in/d24vyu5F The Volkswagen Foundation is allowing Distributed Peer Review: applicants are asked to review proposals by other researchers as a condition to having their own proposal considered .... What would you do? Be nice, or be nasty (surely, less well-received proposals within a funding pool means yours will have a bigger chance ...?) "Around 85% of researchers who applied for grants from a German funder have given the thumbs up to ‘distributed peer review’, a new process in which applicants are asked to review proposals by other researchers as a condition to having their own proposal considered." It's "Distributed Peer Review" .... but will it work? Is it Fair? “Distributed peer review might not be a good choice for larger funding programs with higher funding volumes and longer proposals” Article here 👉 https://lnkd.in/d24vyu5F Plus #PeerReview shortage? 👉 reviewercredits.com was created to SOLVE this issue ..... Share below 👇 --------------- ♻️ Repost if you found this useful 🔥 Follow Reviewer Credits for more peer review news, fun, and content! #peerreview #researchintegrity #publishingintegrity #ethics
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
From Academic Rigor to Industry Impact: Navigating the Shift Transitioning from academia to the healthcare and big data industry within a corporate healthcare setting has been a journey of unexpected lessons. Managing research projects is one thing, but leading a project in this fast-paced environment brings surprises! Here are two valuable takeaways from my experience: Adaptability is Key, Even for the Best Plans: In academia, projects often follow structured, long-term timelines, but in a corporate setting, the pace is quicker, and agility is a must. Moving from marathon-like research projects to Agile sprints was a learning curve but one that taught me the value of flexibility. Being able to pivot quickly and refine strategies on the go has proven essential. Communication: From Full Papers to Precise Pitches: In academia, we rely on publications to communicate findings in exhaustive detail. It’s all about getting to the point and sharing concise updates in the industry. Learning to translate complex ideas into clear, straightforward messages has been invaluable, especially when working across diverse teams. This journey from academic rigor to industry impact has shown me how adaptable and transferable academic skills can be in a fast-paced environment. For a deeper look at my transition and the insights I’ve gained, visit my blog post here: https://lnkd.in/e_YfvAc6. If you've navigated a similar shift, I’d love to connect and hear about your experiences. Let’s keep the conversation going!
Home
lummoura.github.io
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The 2024 Power List shares more memorable advice: from navigating collaborations and picking the right battles to balancing ambition with humility. These insights shape their approaches to science and life. #ScienceAdvice #PowerList2024 https://ow.ly/MTL750Tt5TS
10 Lessons from The Power List (Part 2)
theanalyticalscientist.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Scattered research is the junk food of knowledge. Briefly satisfying. Ultimately worthless. Here's why: All scientific work requires a strategic vision. And most scientists struggle to build one. A brilliant experiment with no overarching purpose? That's not worth much in the long run. A solid study aligned with a clear research vision? Worth 10x more. The greatest scientists understand this equation. You can become a great one by building your strategic pyramid. Purpose at the peak. Not just projects. Start crafting your vision today. Here's how: 1. Define your PURPOSE - the reason you do science 2. Develop your MISSION - your 5-20 year value creation plan 3. Determine your VISION - picture your success in 5-20 years 4. Set GOALS - 1-5 year objectives supporting your mission Top researchers align every experiment with their strategic vision. Repost if it's useful. Follow me to get more of these tips. P.S. Have you built your research pyramid?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
#StayWellinResearch 5. Deadlines Deadlines do cause some anxiety – but they also help in creating the bit of pressure we need to get the job done. So try setting yourself some deadlines for your research. From: 52 Ways to Stay Well.
52 Ways to Stay Well: During your PhD, post-doc or research career
ithinkwell.com.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Research is creating new knowledge.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔎 Day 2 Highlights: Mastering the Art of Formulating a Research Question 🔍 We had another exciting and insightful session on Day 2 of our systematic review training series, focusing on the crucial skill of formulating effective research questions. Crafting the right research question is the foundation of any successful study, and our participants dived into this process with enthusiasm! Key Takeaways: Understanding the Basics: We started with the fundamentals of what makes a research question clear, focused, and researchable. It's like setting the perfect GPS destination before a journey! Exploring Frameworks: Participants learned how to use frameworks like PICO, PEO, and SPIDER to structure their questions. These tools are essential for ensuring that research is both comprehensive and directed. Interactive Exercises: We engaged in hands-on activities, allowing participants to practice formulating research questions based on real-world scenarios. This interactive approach brought theory to life and empowered everyone to think critically. Identifying Research Gaps: We discussed how to spot gaps in existing literature and turn them into valuable research questions. This skill is key to driving innovation and discovery in any field. It was incredible to see our participants' creativity and insight as they developed their research questions. 🎓 Watch the Session: If you missed it or want to revisit the session, check out the video here: https://lnkd.in/dFRZVGVx Stay tuned for more exciting learning as we continue to explore the fascinating world of systematic reviews! #Research #SystematicReviews #ResearchQuestions #PICO #PEO #SPIDER #ProfessionalDevelopment #CenticiniResearch
SIMPLIFIED APPROACH IN FORMULATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
475 followers