In California, if you have a license to manufacture cannabis products you can’t sell anything else. Imagine having a beverage facility and being unable to can virgin beverages, let alone hemp beverages. Hemp, on the other hand is permissible to be put into food and beverages. If you’re a food and beverage manufacturer, you obtain an industrial hemp authorization and you can make hemp derived products in your facility. Adult-use cannabis products can only be released to a licensed cannabis distributor, who only had cannabis products on their trucks. They can only deliver to one of 200-300 licensed cannabis retailers in California that actually pay their bills. Not a very addressable market. Licensed cannabis operators that pivot to hemp want to serve more of their fine products to more people, and they aren’t going to wait for cannabis laws to make logical sense. If you’re a licensed cannabis operator who isn’t in hemp, your frustrations are valid. Why not direct your energy to the state?
Only seed products are GRAS.
Paulo Lacerda Sobral thought FDA ruled against human and animal food and beverage products?
Outside of lobbying it’s simple: we aren’t snitches
Does this mean there’s no chance of a AU licensed manufacturer to make Hemp on the same line? Would they have to choose one or be the other?
Hemp is Cannabis v2.0. Bottom-up legalization vs. top-down.
Not just in California either!! Absolutely insane regulation that stimies business growth profoundly all based on stigma.
Fraud
Building the #Cannabis Industry one company at a time!
8moHow?