Does Fine-tuning Increase Hallucinations? Perhaps... From this paper: https://lnkd.in/gMZUUwVg "We demonstrate that large language models struggle to acquire new factual knowledge through fine-tuning, as fine-tuning examples that introduce new knowledge are learned significantly slower than those consistent with the model's knowledge." Okay, this is what we expect, more or less. And then there's this: 👉 "However, we also find that as the examples with new knowledge are eventually learned, they linearly increase the model's tendency to hallucinate" Uh-oh - fine-tuning can increase hallucinations! What's the takeaway? Anyone paying attention to LLMs should realize by now that your evaluation strategy and effective search for an optimal solution is vital to success. Following a formula, like "RAG + Fine-tuning = My-domain LLM" is merely a starting point. Experiments have consistently shown that "out of the box", such formulations can perform very badly even though they give the impression, upon initial inspection, of being incredibly powerful. Don't be fooled by "demo wow-factor-ness"!
Paul Golding’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Ever felt like your brain is a like an archive room, filled to the brim with files containing all sorts of information? To anyone else, this archive might seem like a maze. But you know exactly where each file is. As I grew older and started learning more about philosophy and psychology, this analogy of mine found its echo in a fascinating concept: the Mental Files Theory. Imagine this: our minds operate like a sophisticated filing system, where each concept or object we encounter in life is like a mental file. These aren't just any files; they're dynamic, constantly updated with new information, merged with others, or even split as our understanding evolves. I wanted to share a paper by Rachel Goodman that dives deep into this theory, exploring its roles, addressing criticisms, and pondering over its interpretations. Goodman's work sheds light on how these mental files help us navigate the complex web of our thoughts and beliefs, from understanding singular thoughts to integrating beliefs and maintaining a continuous belief over time. In the behavioral sciences, this theory opens up new avenues for understanding social interactions, decision-making, and problem-solving, all of which are crucial in the fast-paced world of finance and investment banking. It provides a cognitive framework for understanding how information is organized, processed, and retrieved, which is fundamental for effective communication and collaboration in complex organizational settings.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Recommended viewing: https://lnkd.in/eA-HGzYa Great foundational review of how we process information from Clark Quinn.
Cog. Sci. 101: The Human Information Processing Loop — Learning Development Accelerator
ldaccelerator.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Discover 'Mastering Operations Research: Theory, Practice, and Applications'! 📚 A comprehensive guide to boosting your #OperationsResearch skills. Available on #Amazon. 🚀 #Optimization #Logistics #Finance #Engineering #BigData #AI
Mastering Operations Research: Theory, Practice, and Applications.
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The phrase "What type of?" is commonly used to explore categories, classifications, or variations within a given topic. This question can lead to a deeper understanding of the characteristics, differences, and similarities among various subjects. In this article, we explore the significance of asking "What type of?"
What type of?
https://evolvingsite.ai
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The question "How does a?" is used to inquire about the functioning, process, or behavior of a specific object, system, or phenomenon. This question is essential for understanding how things work, whether in the context of science, technology, nature, or everyday life. In this article, we explore the significance of asking "How does a?"
How does a?
https://evolvingsite.ai
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The question "How does a?" is used to inquire about the functioning, process, or behavior of a specific object, system, or phenomenon. This question is essential for understanding how things work, whether in the context of science, technology, nature, or everyday life. In this article, we explore the significance of asking "How does a?"
How does a?
https://evolvingsite.ai
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Inductive reasoning is a logical thinking method that involves making generalizations or drawing conclusions based on specific observations or experiences. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to use inductive reasoning:1. Observe specific instances: Collect data or experiences related to the topic you want to reason about.2. Identify patterns: Look for similarities, relationships, or trends in the observations.3. Formulate a hypothesis: Based on the patterns you've identified, make an educated guess or proposal about a general principle or conclusion.4. Test the hypothesis: Gather more data or conduct experiments to verify or refine your hypothesis.5. Refine the conclusion: Based on the new evidence, adjust your conclusion or theory to better fit the data.6. Continuously iterate: Repeat the process, refining your conclusion as you gather more information.Example:Observations:- The sun rises every morning.- The sky is blue most days.- The grass is green.Pattern:- The natural world follows consistent patterns.Hypothesis:- The universe operates according to discoverable laws and principles.Testing and refinement:- Scientific inquiry and experimentation verify and refine our understanding of natural laws.Conclusion:- Inductive reasoning helps us develop general theories and principles from specific observations, allowing us to make predictions and understand the world around us.Remember, inductive reasoning is a continuous process, and conclusions are always open to revision as new evidence emerges.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Our brain is a remarkable processing machine, capable of absorbing and interpreting vast amounts of information. However, it is essential for us to recognize that the quality of the ideas, meanings, beliefs, values, decisions, understandings, and concepts that we feed our brain directly impacts our thoughts and actions. In today's information age, where we are constantly bombarded with various sources of content and opinions, it becomes crucial to take charge of the quality control process. We must be mindful of what we expose ourselves to and critically evaluate the information before accepting it as truth. By actively engaging in this quality control process, we can ensure that our thoughts are based on accurate and reliable information. It empowers us to make informed decisions aligned with our values and beliefs. Additionally, it helps us cultivate a deeper understanding of complex concepts by seeking out diverse perspectives and challenging our own assumptions. Taking charge of this process also means being aware of the potential influence external factors can have on our thinking patterns. By consciously selecting sources that promote critical thinking and intellectual growth rather than simply reinforcing existing biases or promoting misinformation, we can shape a more well-rounded perspective. It is through this intentional approach that we can navigate the vast sea of information with clarity and confidence.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Deductive vs Inductive Reasoning: What Are the Key Differences Between These Two Modes of Logic? https://lnkd.in/db7GijvM
Deductive vs Inductive Reasoning: What Are the Key Differences Between These Two Modes of Logic?
sciencetimes.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
LANGUAGE CORNER Business problems are “solved,” not “solved for.” The latter expression comes from algebra, where there may be many variables, and you are asked to solve for one of them. For example, “solve for y, in terms of x.” In everyday problem-solving, “solve for” is an affectation (and it will tip people off that you don’t know algebra).
To view or add a comment, sign in