The US Department of the Interior (#DOI) defines "#Indigenous Knowledge (#IK) [as] the following are generally agreed upon universal concepts that are often used to describe Indigenous Knowledge. IK is a body of observations, oral and written knowledge, innovations, technologies, practices, and beliefs developed by #IndigenousPeoples through interaction and experience with the environment. It is applied to phenomena across biological, physical, social, cultural, and spiritual systems. IK can be developed over millennia, continues to develop, and includes understanding based on evidence acquired through direct contact with the environment and long-term experiences, as well as extensive observations, lessons, and skills passed from generation to generation. IK is developed, held, and stewarded by Indigenous Peoples and is often intrinsic within Indigenous legal traditions, including customary law or traditional governance structures and decision-making processes. Other terms such as #TraditionalKnowledge(s), #TraditionalEcologicalKnowledge, Genetic Resources associated with Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expression, Tribal Ecological Knowledge, Native Science, Indigenous Applied Science, #IndigenousScience, and others, are sometimes used to describe this knowledge system."
Patrick Freeland’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Please see Lorraine Pangle's "Plato's Political Epistemology" in The Political Science Reviewer! https://lnkd.in/eRitf8BY
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What do we (intentionally or unintentionally) subjugate or privilege when we are engaging with IK? I find this table from the paper, “Centering Indigenous Knowledges in ecology and beyond” by Gazing Wolf et al (2024) a useful starting point for engaging with Indigenous Knowledges (IK). Within the academy, discussions about IK seem to be the norm these days but it feels there is an implicit assumption that IK can be “integrated” into existing institutions and scientific disciplines and without those institutions and disciplines having to change. This assumption risks re-colonizing IK by continuing to perpetuate the privileging of western knowledges over others such as IK. A process of integration always carries with it some form of subjugation. For scholars and anyone engaging with IK, we all need to be having hard conversations with ourselves and our colleagues about our commitment to decolonizing disciplines, institutions, and ultimately ourselves. Full paper is linked here: https://lnkd.in/dJBbW4TY
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Alhamdulillah Done with the 1st International Friendship Bridge Social Sciences Congress. Research Paper entitled "The Dynamics of Regional Policies and Foreign Subsidiaries Performance: A Qualitative Analysis"
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This is an excellent illustration of how power imbalances impede co-production, and in the halls of the most powerful institution of Western knowledge production in the US. it also touches on the conflict between consensus (or one strict definition of it) and co-production, although I wish the article had delved further into that. For all the progress that we're making in Aotearoa, there's still such a long way to go, so this article should serve as a reminder and a warning.
The absolute irony: study on knowledge co-production between Indigenous and settler science abandoned because settler science could not get its collective head around the need to co-produce knowledge. "Gregory Symmes, NASEM’s chief program officer, confirmed the panel’s job was “to summarize what’s known about … coproduction,” ... but..., “The study itself was not intended to be coproduced.”" Is it possible to be utterly flabbergasted and yet wholly unsurprised at the same time? https://lnkd.in/gDJaB39S
Study on braiding Indigenous and Western knowledge collapses amid acrimony
science.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🆕 Latest issue on our #ARPHA #Proceedings platform brings together 42 papers from the joint conference of the ECSA - European Citizen Science Association and Österreich forscht that demonstrate the potential of #CitizenScience as a game-changer in #research & #society. 🗨️ "Change can be seen as positive by one group and negative by another. As a result, different perspectives on any given change can draw completely different conclusions. In these proceedings we want to address different approaches to change from all kinds of perspectives within the realm of citizen science and participatory research," explain the collection's editors. 👉 Check the proceedings papers out at: https://lnkd.in/eGkCWF5u Editors include: Katrin Vohland Daniel Dörler Florian Heigl Maria Aristeidou Egle Butkeviciene Olivia H. Barbara Kieslinger Andrzej Klimczuk Gitte Kragh Frank Ostermann Jaume Piera Baiba Prūse Gaston Remmers Susanne Tönsmann Jakub Trojan #citsci #citizenscientists #openscience #openresearch #opendata #researchers #scientists #researchpaper #scientific #scientificpaper #scientificwriting #academicpaper #academicwriting #academicpublishing #publishing #scholarly #stmpublishing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Neither 'western' science nor policy is equipped to implement knowledge co-production, largely because it implies sharing power. The struggle is real, from not being able to publish to constraints on what types of knowledge are formally recognised (from simple acknowledgement to financial recognition), my personal experience and that of many others even since the 'Millennium Ecosystem Services Assessment ' 20 years ago, has been the same, internationally and in NZ, funding holders define most parameters and what 'gets counted'. If leadership doesn't change (radically because of urgency) it will take decades to reform the system. A Science revolution, from kindness in science to the strategic positioning of new people with diverse ways of thinking in leadership is urgent.
The absolute irony: study on knowledge co-production between Indigenous and settler science abandoned because settler science could not get its collective head around the need to co-produce knowledge. "Gregory Symmes, NASEM’s chief program officer, confirmed the panel’s job was “to summarize what’s known about … coproduction,” ... but..., “The study itself was not intended to be coproduced.”" Is it possible to be utterly flabbergasted and yet wholly unsurprised at the same time? https://lnkd.in/gDJaB39S
Study on braiding Indigenous and Western knowledge collapses amid acrimony
science.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What to Know about Project 2025’s Dangers to Science Project 2025 would jeopardize federal scientists’ independence and undermine their influence ———————————————————————————————————- #EMNews #EMUSA #EMPresidency #EMProject2025 #EMScience #EMElection #EMPolicy #EMGovernment #EMFederalGovernment ——————————————————————————————————- #EmergencyManagement #DisasterManagement #CivilDefence #CivilProtection #Resilience #ClimateChange #DisasterRiskReduction #CygnusAtratusIndustria #NoNaturalDisasters #EMProfessionalisation #EMNotES #ProfessionalExcellence https://lnkd.in/gWke-8t9
Project 2025’s Blueprint for a Second Trump Presidency Spells Out How to Harm U.S. Science
scientificamerican.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
We need to challenge entrenched beliefs. Some metaphysical positions are simply choices that need to be challenged if we wish to correct endemic and persistent errors in our understanding of reality and the nature of our being within it. It’s inevitable you’ll meet with resistance/misunderstanding. Sometimes so entrenched that it becomes belligerent! It’s a Kuhnian thing (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) See… https://lnkd.in/eDUgfbZ4 Kuhn initially used incommensurability predominately to challenge cumulative characterizations of scientific advance, according to which scientific progress is an improving approximation to the truth, and to challenge the idea that there are unchanging, neutral methodological standards for comparing theories throughout the development of the natural sciences. See… https://lnkd.in/eZcmgSTv The best breakthroughs in science are when someone dares to challenge the groupminnd think that is held as unchallengeable dogma. It comes with a price though! ***** Some people kind of don’t understand that! 😜
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
New publication; a practical guide to apply an Indigneous Standpoint in research. https://lnkd.in/gCjxuQe6
Using Indigenous Standpoint Theory with the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children
methods.sagepub.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Christo Ananth - CAHIERS MAGELLANES-NS - Web of Science - ISSN 1624-1940 - Genuine Review - English - #ChristoAnanth Video Link: https://lnkd.in/d68WRZw6 Telegram Link: https://lnkd.in/dj52svBb #cahiersmagellanes #webofscience #ChristoAnanth #webofscienceindexed #zoologicalrecords #biologicalrecords #clonedwebsite
Christo Ananth - CAHIERS MAGELLANES-NS - Web of Science - ISSN 1624-1940 - Genuine Review - English
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
Natural Resource Specialist at United States Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Retired)
5moThanks for sharing