“That said, demand-side management programs need much more attention and dedicated resources.” Exactly. 75% of that clean energy goes to buildings, good demand-side management in buildings can reduce need for new generation and transmission development, reduce habitat and land-owner disputes and control energy rates. Winning! Let’s do it, people.
The balance between meeting increasing power demand and meeting greenhouse gas emission/ carbon-intensity reduction targets by reducing fossil-fuel electricity generation with renewables and battery storage is challenging, but achievable. Lots of takeaways here, but one thought in the article stands out - "To be fair, there are real barriers to speeding up what is already a rapid U.S. clean energy buildout" - this is the issue to get to scale, especially in the regions of the country that are experiencing exponential population, manufacturing, and industrial growth. That said, demand-side management programs need much more attention and dedicated resources. Canary Media Inc. Sierra Club Edison Electric Institute NRECA
Managing Director, Carbon Policy and Markets Initiative
2moindeed! the cheapest megawatt is the negawatt! thanks for your tireless advocacy on these critically important issues.