OLQ and OLE’s Post

Safeguarding Reputations and Futures - Legal Bridge LLP, Your White-Collar Crime Defense Experts in Lahore, Pakistan! ⚖️💼 🌟 Expert Defense Against White-Collar Charges! 🌟 Legal Bridge LLP in Lahore specializes in white-collar crime defense. Our experienced lawyers defend against charges of fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, and handle complex financial and regulatory issues. Trust our team to safeguard reputations and futures. Facing white-collar crime charges requires expert defense. Legal Bridge LLP, based in Lahore, Pakistan, stands as your defense experts, offering specialized services in white-collar crime defense with experienced lawyers dedicated to safeguarding reputations and futures. Our committed team at Legal Bridge LLP is focused on providing expert defense against white-collar charges. Whether facing allegations of fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, or dealing with complex financial and regulatory issues, trust our white-collar crime defense lawyers to navigate the intricacies with confidence. At Legal Bridge LLP, we understand the gravity of white-collar charges and the impact they can have on reputations and futures. Our commitment is to provide comprehensive and expert assistance, empowering you to face these challenges with confidence. Ready to safeguard reputations and futures with confidence? Contact Legal Bridge LLP today, and let's navigate the complexities of white-collar crime defense together. https://wa.me/923246933989 https://lnkd.in/dFBCfm3n ⚖️💼🌟 #FinancialDefenseExperts #LegalBridgeWhiteCollarDefense #LahoreLegalProtection #DefendWithConfidence 🚀

Incident Investigation and Legal Ramifications Unfold Following Unlawful Actions After yesterday's incident where individuals flagrantly abused their power and took advantage of a situation where they did not even want to accept evidence of wrongdoing, fraud, corruption and organized crime. They didn't even let you contact anyone. And the General Inspection of the Security Forces is also from this. From a professional point of view, the lines were crossed, as evidenced by the video footage of the unfortunate events. The incident involved a gross mishandling of documentation and a deliberate effort to withhold information from authorities. Unsubstantiated claims were made in an attempt to incite aggression, leading to a situation where I found myself compelled to navigate administrative hurdles in the sweltering heat, dehydrated, all in pursuit of securing essential identification documents required for necessary proceedings. It became evident that within the confines of the state prosecutors' office, vested interests prevailed, shielding criminal activities and thwarting legitimate attempts to present factual evidence as mandated by protocols. This is corroborated by my formal complaints following established guidelines. The cautionary advice emerges against factual accuracy as it presents a perilous undertaking. Those in positions of power are subject to potential legal repercussions lasting several years if proven to manipulate facts. Upon meticulous examination of their records, fabricated allegations surfaced, constituting acts of fraud, corruption, and abuse directed towards individuals of authority and legislative representatives, contravening European directives. This issue has been under investigation since February, as initial attempts to hold wrongdoers accountable were thwarted by the very security entities entrusted to uphold the law. The persistent persistence of criminal elements underscores the necessity of reinforcing judicial integrity and ensuring that justice is served to. T.č, that's what the bodies have on the table to start the meeting. Josef Anger, the CEO, Owner, and Board Member of CNBC

“…...ASIC has made Australia a haven for white-collar crime. ASIC has given up on their sole obligation to enforce corporate law," Senator Bragg has said.” 1 July 2024 ABC News. For example “…...ASIC will only intervene in private legal proceedings in limited circumstances, which we have set out in our Information Sheet 180: ASIC approach to involvement in private legal proceedings.” 22 March 2017 Warren Day Senior Executive Leader Assessment &Intelligence ASIC  “…..ASIC and the Singaporean Authorities are the appropriate avenues to assess your complaint as it involves a company is potentially a Commercial Fraud. They are the most appropriate body to investigate at this stage. If criminal offences are identified by them, then it may be referred back to Victoria Police for investigation. Please refer all further enquires to ASIC until the matter progresses”. 11 November 2016 Regards, Cameron HENRY | Detective Leading Senior Constable Fraud & Extortion Squad | Crime Command | Victoria Police  “…..I also note that the allegations contained in your correspondence have previously been dealt with by ASIC and the Federal Court. I have concluded therefore that an investigation by the AFP is not warranted. We will take no further action.” Regards Stephen Reeves-Williams Australian Federal Police, National Operations, State Service Centre, Southern Command. See PD1 page 12 below In Singapore the following  “……You may wish to lodge a report with your local authorities and seek their assistance. After lodging the Police report, the authorities may refer your report to the Singapore Police Force through INTERPOL to seek the required assistance where necessary.” 23 July 2024 Tan Chor Hoon (Ms) Assistant Research & Planning Officer Planning & Organization Development Division Commercial Affairs Department (“CAD”).  “……. Your complaint against the abovenamed lawyers (“Respondents”) be dismissed as it is frivolous, misconceived and/or lacking in substance.” K Gopalan Director Conduct, Singapore Law Society, (Yr. Ref RC062/2016) 29 September 2016. PROJECT D CRIMES 1.     The Secret illegal and fraudulent trading of, 23million shares and the further USD30million fraud and embezzlement, 2.     The sabotage of the company cash flow. 3.     Spread malicious innuendo and untruths to vilify Mr Huber and the company. 4.     The forgery of 500 proxy forms led by Melvin Tan and others and Bribing Chua Min Wee USD300,000 to commit criminal breach of trust. 5.     The $1million bribery and the theft of the company’s intellectual property using their secret company called Avanseus Holdings Pte Ltd. 6.     The second theft of CellOS intellectual property by Janifer Yeo-Tan using their secret company called SGM Analytics Pte Ltd. 8.     The theft of the Mr Huber’s car and actions leading to the loss of his property 9.     Defraud the Commonwealth through a fake R&D Grant for A$6.8million embezzled 10. Defraud the Commonwealth of $76,400 partly embezzled

Business owners beware: Could the SFO be knocking on your door? A Serious Fraud Office investigation can be a nightmare for any business. But what triggers it, and how can you protect yourself? Our latest blog explores the SFO's role, investigation process, and the importance of legal support. Click the link for insights to safeguard your business: https://lnkd.in/gNW54ug6 #SFO #FraudInvestigation #BusinessLaw #LegalAdvice #AskewsLegal

"Honest Services" Fraud Congress has long prioritized addressing public-sector corruption, creating several criminal laws to hold corrupt officials accountable under federal standards. Among these, the federal mail and wire fraud statutes—particularly the “honest services” provision—have been central to prosecuting fraud. This concept targets officials who violate the public’s trust for personal gain, defining such betrayals as criminal fraud. Over time, the “honest services” fraud framework has faced scrutiny from the Supreme Court, which has limited its scope, emphasizing that overly broad applications could present constitutional challenges, especially concerning vagueness and federal-state relations. #AntiCorruption #HonestServicesFraud #FederalLaw #PublicIntegrity #SupremeCourt https://lnkd.in/dFGhV7iT

This was a topic debated when I joined the Serious Fraud Office (UK) in 2005 (as a forensic accountant). It's crazy that the issue still exists today. #fraud #corruption #riskmanagement #forensics

'We are optimistic that the enforcement agency will initiate more investigations addressing both domestic and global complex fraud and corruption issues.' - Hannah Laming, Squire Patton Boggs. In our latest white-collar crime market report, Alex Marsland looks at how senior in-house lawyers need to be alert to fraud and white-collar crime issues now more than ever due to a revitalised Serious Fraud Office and new legislation increasing liability for senior management. Read more at: https://lnkd.in/d7eej6MG #whitecollarcrime #law #ihl #legal500

Similarities and Differences Between White Collar and Corporate Crime A lot of people misconstrue the terms white collar Crime and corporate crime, thinking that they all mean the same thing. Basically, people just confused them as meaning the same thing because they are both criminal activities that belong to the same category. They are carried out by individuals but there are still stark differences that separate them from each other. They have their own characteristics that can be distinguished based on the one thing that will be discussed below. Criminal lawyers in Dubai are all aware that it is better for organizations to be educated when it comes to these two things because it will help them in finding out what to avoid in their organization and how to avoid them. These kinds of cases are handled by international law firms in Dubai, tackling what owners should do in this kind of situation. As mentioned above, there is one question that you can answer to help you in knowing the difference between the two: who benefits from the crime? In every situation that involves these crimes, you need to have the answer to that question so you’d know to which one that situation falls into corporate crime or white-collar crime. One way of differentiating these two is to define them first in order to weigh where exactly they are the same and where they differ. Corporate Crime and White-Collar Crime What is a Corporate Crime? Wikipedia has defined a corporation as “a union of natural persons that has its own legal status” and it is independent of the people in the company. In this sense, the corporate crime is all about committing the crimes not for people but for the sake of the company itself. The corporation does not really commit the crimes but the people who are running or part of it. It should be noted though that the owners or the whole company know about the crime that is being committed. It doesn’t mean that if some of their employees have done a crime for the benefit of the company that the latter condones illegal activities. The business is the one that is punished by bearing the fines. With this, it is the corporation that will be fined with penalties for the crimes committed by their employees under their wing. It is simply an added punishment to have other people be aware of the wrongdoing that the organization has done, putting a stain on their name. As a summary for this, corporate crime is about the people committing a crime for their company to benefit and gain more revenue, like performing fraud to trick people into buying their product or acquiring their service.

Will be interesting to compare, in time, the number of anticipated DPAs as a consequence of the failure to prevent provisions under the ECCTA 2023 to the modest number that have been court approved under the Bribery Act 2010.

Demoralizing Elite Fraud - PDF: https://lnkd.in/gQZZzB-5 The Supreme Court’s effort to avoid interpreting morally weighted terms like “fraud” and “honest services” has led it to make bad and confusing law in wire-fraud cases. These cases, unlike Citizens United and its ilk, are unanimous, joining liberal and conservative Justices, reflecting a shared skepticism about anti-corruption law.  Ciminelli and Percoco are not easy cases. They implicate genuinely challeng-ing questions about the relationship between fraud and bid rigging, and the scope of the fiduciary obligation owed to the public by powerful people who wield functional power but lack a title. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court dealt with these difficult questions lightly and with proxies.  The Court’s highly contested decisions in Citizens United, McCutcheon, and similar cases are undeniably the most problematic of the judicial interventions in corruption cases, severely undermining public power to limit the corrupting influence of money in elections and politics. But Percoco, Ciminelli, and the other mail- and wire-fraud cases matter more because the Court in the campaign-fi-nance cases cut off the ability to pass bright-line rules and functionally mandated that the bulk of the anticorruption apparatus exist in criminal law.  It’s not easy. The most serious flaw in these cases is not that which is said, but that which is unsaid: the lack of exploration, the lack of seriousness, the lightness with which the Court throws out decades of jurisprudence—as in Ci-minelli—and conflates past and current jury instructions—as in Percoco. The cases look neither backwards (exploring history and statutory logic), nor for-wards (charting a path, or fully obstructing it, for future prosecutors). Serious objections are waved away. Percoco and Ciminelli represent the Supreme Court’s peak illegitimacy. They do not cohere as examples of serious statutory interpretation, and they barely scratch the surface of constitutional exploration. In the end, the Court acts as if the criminal fraud and corruption law simply isn’t treated as a subspecies of criminal law, but as its own unique arena, in which the Court, not lawmakers, have special insight into what laws should look like. But the ideal statute is never described—it exists just out of sight while lurking as a cudgel to strike down anything that doesn’t feel right. While envelopes of cash being given to a state lawmaker in an IHOP bathroom might constitute a bribe, nearly everything else does not.200 The Court fancies itself as a guard against wily lawmakers and prosecutors trying to sneak something tricky by them, when in fact, they are themselves the guards opening the gate to more corruption and elite malfeasance. #EliteFraud #Corruption #Briberty #anticorruptionlaw #SCOTUS #honestservices #criminalfraud #publiccorruption