Olivier Vigna’s Post

View profile for Olivier Vigna, graphic
Olivier Vigna Olivier Vigna is an Influencer

Public Affairs & Advocacy

Paris Europlace Crypto-Assets Working Group, chaired by Hubert de Vauplane, welcomes #ESMA consultations on reverse solicitation and on the qualification of #crypto-assets as financial instruments. We appreciate ESMA's approach in determining a broad concept of solicitation, as well as the means and persons involved in which a third-party firm could solicit EU clients, to protect investors and #MiCA-compliant crypto-asset service providers. This approach will help avoid differences in interpretation, ensuring a fair level of #competition between EU crypto-asset market participants. Regarding influencers -a concept that has no definition in European law-, such a concept could lead to large divergences of interpretation between Member States and run counter to the principle of predictability of law. Conversely, the use of general clauses or online pop-up “I agree” boxes, whereby clients state that any transaction is executed on the exclusive initiative of the client, is deemed to be reverse solicitation. Concerning the qualification of crypto-assets as financial instruments, regulation should offer an appropriate degree of legal #protection and facilitate the distinction between crypto-assets within the scope of MiCA and crypto-assets assimilated to financial instruments. Opting for a holistic approach is key, enabling Member States to move forward in an harmonised way on the assimilation of crypto-assets to financial instruments, without the criteria set in place being too strict to rapidly risk becoming obsolete. We thus fully support the technologically neutral approach proposed by ESMA. Given the diversity of the list of securities implemented in jurisdictions and to avoid regulatory shopping within the EU, a Q&A should be produced by ESMA to list examples, for each Member State, for which some crypto-assets could be reclassified as financial instruments under national law. This Q&A could be updated and provide the EU crypto-asset market with global visibility on the qualification risk with a goal of harmonisation within the EU. This Q&A could also serve as a regulatory monitoring tool for the legal status of crypto-assets and help ESMA identify any lack of harmonization. All in all, crypto-assets should be subject to the exact same rules as other traditional financial instruments in line with the principle of technological neutrality. A substance over form approach needs to be adopted to determine if a crypto-asset is qualified as a financial instrument.  Many thanks to all contributors, especially Hubert de Vauplane Philippe Goutay Emilien Bernard-Alzias Myriam Dana -Thomä Matthieu Lucchesi Frederick Lacroix Hugo Bordet Please read the document here: https://lnkd.in/eDMrNWNb European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) – France

Véronique Rondeau-Abouly

Avocat, DPO , RGPD, Blockchain , Cryptomonnaie, DeFi et NFT, Finance Durable et RSE ,Intelligence Artificielle, Propriété intellectuelle du numérique Droit des plateformes , Contentieux du droit d'expression en ligne

7mo

Très intéressant commentaire , j’ai hâte de lire ce document de l’ESMA, merci Olivier Vigna

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics