NeurIPS acknowledges that the cultural generalization made by the keynote speaker today reinforces implicit biases by making generalisations about Chinese scholars. This is not what NeurIPS stands for. NeurIPS is dedicated to being a safe space for all of us. We want to address the comment made during the invited talk this afternoon, as it is something that NeurIPS does not condone and it doesn't align with our code of conduct. We are addressing this issue with the speaker directly. NeurIPS is dedicated to being a diverse and inclusive place where everyone is treated equally.
What does cultural generalization mean?
I feel deeply ashamed that such blatantly racist content was presented at this conference, misrepresenting an entire group of people with harmful stereotypes. This goes beyond generalization—it's intentional racism.
It's not "cultural generalization". It's RACISM.
Try not to sugarcoat anything here. No needs to mention the nationality here and she knew it. Otherwise she would not have been self-defended and explained “ohhh most Chinese I met are blah blah blah.” She knew it was incorrect but she still did it. It is racism and as the organizer, you should take your responsibilities and your moves 🤗.
Any actions from NeurIPS?
Did NeurIPS reviewed the presentations? If so, they share same responsibility; if not, they should start reviewing keynote and other presentations to prevent future failures
Even ChatGPT recognized how inappropriate the slide was. I'm genuinely concerned.
Teacher
6dSo called “not intentionally trying to be racism” is defined as micro-racism, and racism about language, e.g., international students don’t know how to write academic articles as English is their second language (just an example), is defined as linguistic-racism. Just google the terms and we can find lots of published articles and reports. For example, Lentin, A. (2018). Beyond denial: ‘not racism’ as racist violence. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 400-414. Just for sharing.