Niklas J.R.M. Schmidt’s Post

Major Canadian news media companies have initiated legal action against OpenAI, the company behind the well-known chatbot ChatGPT. The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI has infringed on their copyright by using their content to train its AI models without obtaining permission. This legal action has been filed in the Federal Court of Canada. The plaintiffs in […]

#OpenAI #CopyrightInfringement “In a revealing exposé that underscores the growing ethical concerns in artificial intelligence development, former OpenAI researcher Suchir Balaji has stepped forward with troubling allegations about the company's data collection practices. His departure adds to the mounting exodus of key personnel from the AI giant, raising questions about the company's direction and practices.” “In his interviews and blog posts, Balaji raises ethical concerns about the AI industry (who would have guessed?) and the threat to content creators. He claims OpenAI’s broad data-harvesting strategies could be violating copyrights, bringing potential legal storms and jeopardizing the entire ecosystem of internet of online content creation.” Read the post and go to the link for the Forbes article: #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #IP #IntelectualProperty #PropiedadIntelectual #PI #GenerativeAi #GeAi #InteligenciaArtificial #InteligenciaArtificialGenerativa #IntelligenceArtificielle #KünstlicheIntelligenz #Law #Tech #Technology #propriétéintellectuelle #Copyright #CopyrightLaw #Data #TDM #DataMining #TextMining #Content #DataCollection #Creators #DataHarvesting #AIEthics #DataTraining #AITools #ContentCreation #SustainableAI #AIandLaw #DerechoDeAutor #DroitdAuteur #Digital #DigitalRights #CreativeIndustries

Is the rise of artificial intelligence built on the exploitation of artists and creators? A groundbreaking lawsuit filed by a nonprofit group against OpenAI and Microsoft, the developers behind ChatGPT, may shed some light. The lawsuit, as reported by The Detroit News on June 27, 2024, contends that these companies have violated copyright laws by using vast amounts of creative work without proper consent from the original creators. It's alleged that OpenAI and Microsoft have benefited from proprietary content while ignoring the rights and royalties due to the artists and writers who produced it. This legal action brings forward significant ethical questions concerning how AI models are trained, who owns the rights to the content, and how profits should be distributed in this burgeoning industry. As the lawsuit progresses, it challenges us to consider the broader implications of AI development on creative industries. Staying informed about this legal battle is essential for understanding how it could impact the future of technology and copyright laws. Got Questions or want to learn more? Then visit - https://lnkd.in/gwZD2XWp or Go to my website https://lnkd.in/gytQRbhX #AI #Artificialintelligence #AInews #entrepreneur #smallbusiness #copyright #creativity #technology #innovation #legal #ethics

A prominent news nonprofit has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging 'exploitative' copyright infringement related to using its content by ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence developed jointly by the two tech giants. The lawsuit contends that the organizations utilized copyrighted material without proper authorization or compensation, posing significant ethical and legal questions about the boundaries of AI-generated content. This legal action marks a pivotal moment in the intersection of technology, intellectual property rights, and journalism, raising concerns about the ethical implications of AI tools accessing and potentially repurposing copyrighted information. As the case unfolds, it will likely influence future policies and practices surrounding using copyrighted material in AI development and deployment. Read more at: https://lnkd.in/g5PNcP47 #CopyrightInfringement #AIethics #IntellectualProperty #TechLaw #Journalism #LegalIssues #OpenAI #Microsoft #AIdevelopment

When does innovation become imitation with a twist? BREAKING NEWS: Canadian media companies are taking ChatGPT to court! Apparently, OpenAI’s AI has been doing some extra homework—using their content without permission. The Toronto Star, The Globe and Mail, and CBC/Radio-Canada are saying, “Hey, we didn’t sign up to be your study buddies!” They're accusing OpenAI of copyright infringement for allegedly using their journalistic work to train its AI models without so much as a thank you (or a royalty check). OpenAI, on the other hand, is sticking to its script, claiming it only uses "publicly available" data under the fair use umbrella. This lawsuit joins a growing lineup of battles between creators and AI innovators, raising the question: When does innovation become imitation with a twist? As AI continues to push boundaries, this case might just set a precedent for how we draw the lines between creativity, copyright, and code. For now, we’ll just grab some popcorn and watch the legal drama unfold. https://lnkd.in/dJeeXAQ4 #AI #CopyrightDrama #OpenAI #MediaRights

#inthemeantime #ai hi chatgpt how do you avoid getting sued Our Report: Following the New York Times and Times lawsuits, three more news organizations—The Intercept, Raw Story, and AlterNet—have filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT-related copyright infringement. 🔑 Key Points: The lawsuits claim that ChatGPT reproduces “copyright-protected works of journalism” without including the author, title, and any copyright information. It argues that if OpenAI used copyright information to train its ChatGPT model, the chatbot would include this detail in its responses, but it doesn’t. It claims that OpenAI is aware of this issue as it has an opt-out system to block GPT content crawlers, and also offers copyright infringement legal cover for ChatGPT users. 🤨 Why you should care: These lawsuits add to the growing debate around copyright laws and AI, with companies like Getty Images also pursuing legal action against AI developers for copyright infringement Better be safe then sorry 😎

#inthemeantime #ai hi chatgpt how do you avoid getting sued Our Report: Following the New York Times and Times lawsuits, three more news organizations—The Intercept, Raw Story, and AlterNet—have filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT-related copyright infringement. 🔑 Key Points: The lawsuits claim that ChatGPT reproduces “copyright-protected works of journalism” without including the author, title, and any copyright information. It argues that if OpenAI used copyright information to train its ChatGPT model, the chatbot would include this detail in its responses, but it doesn’t. It claims that OpenAI is aware of this issue as it has an opt-out system to block GPT content crawlers, and also offers copyright infringement legal cover for ChatGPT users. 🤨 Why you should care: These lawsuits add to the growing debate around copyright laws and AI, with companies like Getty Images also pursuing legal action against AI developers for copyright infringement Better be safe then sorry 😎

OpenAI has launched a robust defense against the New York Times' copyright lawsuit, accusing the newspaper of "hacking" its chatbot, ChatGPT, and other AI systems to fabricate evidence for the case. In a filing submitted to a federal judge in Manhattan on Monday, OpenAI urged the court to dismiss parts of the lawsuit, asserting that the Times employed deceptive tactics to manipulate its technology. Please follow merklepal for tech updates #ai #openai #chatgpt #artificialintelligence #tech #technews #linkedin #linkedinconnections

In a precedent setting legal battle, OpenAI finds itself at odds with The New York Times over allegations of copyright infringement. At the heart of the dispute is the claim that OpenAI used vast amounts of copyrighted material to train its AI systems, including the renowned ChatGPT, without proper authorisation. OpenAI countered by accusing NYT of engaging in deceptive practices, allegedly "hacking" ChatGPT to produce evidence for the lawsuit. This raises critical questions about the ethical use of AI technology, the boundaries of fair use in the digital age, and the potential impact on content creators and publishers. OpenAI have previously struck deals with other outlets, for example, Axel Springer which owns POLITICO and Business Insider, to use their content. However, there have been questions around the scale of payments, given the extensive use the organisations' content will undergo as a part of training in these AI models. Competition Policy International - OpenAI Accuses New York Times of ‘Hacking’ ChatGPT in Copyright Lawsuit - https://lnkd.in/dSbvY7jJ Euronews - ChatGPT owner OpenAI strikes deal with news publishers to use content to train its AI - https://lnkd.in/duY3b6Ru The Verge - OpenAI’s news publisher deals reportedly top out at $5 million a year - https://lnkd.in/dd5chQRf #ethicalai #responsibleai #genai #copyright #content #dispute #legalai #legal #ownership

Guess what? You now have two huge legal teams available to defend you. Both Microsoft and OpenAI, who are being sued by news outlets for using copyrighted material, have said that they will use their lawyers to defend you should somebody sue you for using copyrighted content in conjunction with ChatGPT. Boom - your huge new legal team! If you read news stories for fun and entertainment, this one has that, too. Buried in the lawsuit is the laughable claim that, "ChatGPT would be less popular and generate less revenue if users believed that ChatGPT responses violated third-party copyrights." Yep. Nobody is gonna want to use AI anymore. https://lnkd.in/gJtFPDwe?