Extremely interesting reading - v relevant to UK archaeology and charitable/voluntary orgs. The ‘COVID gains’ point rings so true - some of the work I’m most proud of, and that has contributed back into our practice as well as pushed us forward into a much stronger future, happened as a result of unrestricted funding support.
Our sector has the exact issues outlined so well in the post below. The links in the OP contain a wealth of knowledge about possible better futures. We are standing at an inflection point where climate impacts underlie every converging complexity - surely putting money where it can best serve solutions and a liveable human future on this planet should be more important than the palliative safety of old processes?
A really interesting suite of articles looking at the impact of restricted versus unrestricted funding in encouraging a flexible, innovative and accountable #charity sector. Instead of making restricted awards (and hence restricting inputs) shouldn't funders be concentrating more on quantifying impact and outcomes?
As a bare minimum before we even get into anything transformative the groundwork has to be 5-10 years of unrestricted core resource for systems transitions, next systems work. It’s not smart for us to spend our entire lifetime fighting for that first, when that needs to happen quickly so we can do some of the bigger endowment busting, distributive, transformative, reparative shifting of capital.
Stead Family Chair in International Philanthropy at IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy & Professor Societal Significance of Charity Lotteries at VU Amsterdam
Excellent overview of the resources IVAR has created about the effects of unrestricted funding. If you are interested in changing the project based funding paradigm, check these out!
In a possible breach of LinkedIn etiquette, I'm adding a postscript, as my day continued with a 'Leading in Uncertainty' support session with a group of charity leaders from across the UK. The conversation quickly turned to the daily grind of fundraising and a roll call of worst hits: unclear criteria; opaque processes; short-term funding; an obsession with 'new' over 'core'; and onerous reporting. The gains of Covid are slipping away: "we were trusted...but only for a very short time".
I was reminded of a study we carried out through the recession, when our aim was "to help shine light on the practices of trusts and foundations at a time of almost unprecedented upheaval in the lives and circumstances of voluntary organisations" (sound familiar?). It's sobering to read our introduction (extract below), 12 years on. At the time, we were criticised for the title of our report, 'Duty of care'. Having spent 90 minutes listening to the burden being carried by charity leaders, I'm not sure that conceiving of funders' (with their broader and more resourced shoulders) responsibility to applicants and funded organisations as a 'duty of care' is so wide of the mark....
"The current scale and pace of change is overwhelming. Voluntary organisations are experiencing a bewildering set of challenges, characterised by complexity (for example, changes to the organisation and funding of public services) and distress (in particular, increasing levels of poverty and hardship amongst their users and beneficiaries). During our visits across the country, we saw with our own eyes the incredible work that is being carried out in local areas, often against all the odds, to provide real and tangible benefits to local people. We also heard about the huge importance attached to foundation funding and how, when it works, it can provide a lifeline and make a lasting difference.
However, for many, the world of foundations is obscure and closed. Speaking truth to power still appears to be the exception to the rule. Many of the problems and concerns highlighted by our study participants can be linked to shortcomings in relationships. Whilst we recognise that effort and skill is required to make them work, the findings presented in this report suggest that improvements are still needed. One of the important conclusions that we reach is that conceiving of the interaction between funders and voluntary organisations as relational – rather than contractual – might help to develop trust, foster openness and create a virtuous circle in which both parties are better able to realise their goals. For this to happen, funders could be guided by a commitment to making grants a positive experience for grant holders, rather than operating in ways which set people up to fail, or that privilege their own demands and systems over the circumstances and capacity of the organisations and individuals they are trying to reach. We have described this commitment as a ‘duty of care’."
A call for funding bodies to think about strategically funding.
In the Gladstone region there has been hundreds of millions of $'s distributed into the community through investment funds or grant funding. While we are grateful for this funding, has it really made a difference strategically to the community.
Community organisations are still calling for more money and more volunteers which is crucial for them to survive, so has and is this funding having the impact in areas that most community organisations are struggling with?
The funding is distributed in small amounts, so everyone gets a little. This strategy while great for those funding bodies that need to say, 'we have funded x number of organisations', but it is not truly investing in our community. This method doesn't build the capacity of the not-for-profit community to learn to self-fund or to build ways of supporting volunteers, it only provides a short relief for a short time and the cycle continues.
NFP House has been established to fill the gap of supporting the 500 local not for profit organisations learn and grow to be more self-sufficient.
A shout out to Gladstone Area Water Board and ConocoPhillips for thinking strategically and funding NFP House to build the capacity of all not-for-profit organisations, making a significant long-term impact in this region.
As a funder, we know that our role isn’t just to get money out the door.
It’s to make meaningful connections with our community.
Create space for important conversations.
Truly listen to the organisations and people working on the front lines.
Provide opportunities for feedback.
And build relationships across the philanthropic and funding sectors.
Why?
So, we can fund in a way that is impactful and relevant to the challenges faced by our communities, and that truly helps our not-for-profits to grow.
We call it being ‘less transactional, more transformational.’
By adopting this approach, we are tapping into so many opportunities to make lasting change for our communities.
By building trusting relationships, we are more thoroughly understanding the kaupapa of organisations and why their mahi is important.
By creating safe spaces for the raw and real conversations, we are deepening our knowledge of what the pain points are, so we can fund in a way that serves to alleviate them.
By providing feedback opportunities, we are making sure we are operating in a way that removes barriers and helps not-for-profits focus on doing the mahi.
This isn’t just about getting money out the door.
It’s about making a real difference.
It’s about playing our part.
And it’s about working together to deliver long-term change.
To find out more about our approach to funding and our learnings from 2023, click through below to read our 2023 Funding Wrap Up.
An experienced for-purpose founder, leader and director focused on philanthropy, equity, community and moving resources more effectively to where they're needed most.
#GrantAdvisorUK helps to improve communication between grant givers and grant seekers. If you’re a social impact organisation, you can:
• Leave anonymous reviews for any funder, even if it's not yet listed - helping others and letting the funder know about your experience
• See others’ experiences of applying to funders - including how long it takes to complete the application process and how much funding they applied for
• See what the funders had to say in response to reviews
• Gain insight to help with your funding applications
Get started today! 👉 https://buff.ly/3esmUuk