NATARAJAN THUPPIL SUNDARAJAN’s Post

Critical Legal Evidentiary submission put on record For Total Legal impact on Fraudulent On Going Forged Fake Full OC application of 22 2 24 by Cr Accused Arch 85 9400 Shashank Kokil for Totally FSI Fraudulent 100% Criminally Illegal Ongoing - in its 10th year- Oberoi Maxima -To:BMC BP WS 1 DCE MR BAJIRAO PATIL & EE MR GURAV Re: Fw: Mr Gurav-Further to Our meeting & communications of 24th June Re: To EE Mr. Gurav - For your Full Consideration & immediate action as Mandated by law Re: VOICE APPEAL TO DCE MR BAJIRAO PATIL FOR HIS URGENT CONSIDERATION AND IMMEIDATE SUITABLE ACTIO..., *DEMAND;* REJECT FORGED FULL OC APPLICATION WHICH DE FACTO ERASES THE FORGED FAKE FRAUDULENTLY ISSUED ON 30 6 23 BY CRIMINALLY ACCUSED AE MR ASIF MOOSE SHAIKH To, BMC BP WS 1 MR BAJIROA PATIL "I declare on record that to treat the FULL OC application of 22 2 24 as application for only another PART OC for criminal illegal Restaurants within Totally FSI Fraudulent 100% criminally illegal Oberoi Maxima is maliciously & criminally illegalmischievous ,absolutely mala fide and deliberately manipulative & perverse resort to fraudulent issue full OC by molesting of true material facts and irrefutable points of law for singular benefit of Vikas Oberoi" "Such " forged" or any Part OC is once again put under legal scrutiny ,fresh assement& total consideration cum due diligence by all competent authorities officially culpable for full OC is under scrutiny VIDE FORGED APPLICATION FOR FULL OC OF 22 2 24" "No one escapes the above unconditionally of any action on record/ response by " passing the buck "to earlier competent authorities." "No competent authority is spared from mandatory responsibilities to full scrutiny and total diligence on whatever has come to him or herfor sanction/approval under powers of his office." Right from Sub Engineer to MC of MCGM. *SPECIALLY WHEN EACH ONE OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY IS MADE KNOWN FROM 22 2 24 ONWARD OF ALL SUBSTANTIATED OBJECTIONS / ALLEGATIONS AGAINST PROCESSING FORGED FULL OC APPLICATION FOR TOTALLY FSI FRAUDULENT 100%CRIMINALLY ILLEGAL OBEROI MAXIMA*

We are pleased to share that our team represented Sub-Inspector Varun Chechi, who was acquitted in a high-profile case involving allegations of demanding a bribe of Rs. 25 lakhs. The case was registered based on a complaint from Manoj Kumar, accusing SI Varun Chechi of seeking the bribe to avoid implicating certain individuals in a Rs. 45,000 crore Ponzi scam. Our team, led by our Founder, Adv. Harsh K. Sharma, our Associate Partners, Vaibhavi Sharma, and Lakshya Parasher, along with our Senior Associate, Bhumika Yadav, and Associate, Rishabh Sharma, effectively challenged the prosecution’s evidence. We highlighted the discrepancies in the case, emphasizing the complainant’s motives to obstruct the investigation and raising concerns about the reliability of the prosecution’s witnesses. The Hon'ble Court recognized the significant weaknesses in the prosecution's case, leading to the acquittal of our client. The trial was completed within six months, highlighting the effectiveness of diligent preparation and a thorough approach to legal defense. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/gNr_QTK4 #legaljudgment #legaldisputes #criminaldefense #briberycase #CBI #ponziscam #legalvictory

The Malaysian Bar cartel rules to starve services to informed clients resistant to Cartel members scams as captive clients can be defeated. Defeating The Malaysian Bar cartel corrupt rules requires additional clauses to service engagement contracts Malaysian solicitors force clients to accept in asymmetrical power contract. Clients should insist engagement be on good faith contract with continuity clauses and substitute performance cost clause. specifically clients should specify any documents in solicitors temporary possession to perform their duties and return on request. most Clients unknowingly and wrongly misled by malicious solicitors has right of possessory lien on the client's documents. The Malaysian Bar cartel rule where members require permission of previous solicitors to take over a case is incongruous to the clients' rights to choose loyal representation with integrity. Cartel's rules and cartel cooperative service starvation tactics puts the clients on extreme coercion to maintain paying any disloyal and malicious solicitors or risk costly case disruption by Cartel's designed rules.Cartel's rules give malicious solicitors power of coercion to misappropriate of the client's cause of action to generate arbitrary billings. In one instance the disloyal Raymond terminate engagement over dispute when the opposing party no longer has spending rights of estate's funds to prolong litigation to stipulate as replacement defendant but Raymond insist to proceeded with interlocutory that could be avoided by opposing party's stipulation and agreement as replacement for the deceased defendant as a named executor as the deceased defendant Many departing disloyal solicitors will bury time bombs of incomplete work to sabotage scam resistant client. this Cartel scam has to be exposed and disrupted.

Understanding the Legal Maxim "Fraus Est Celare Fraudem" In the intricate web of legal principles, there exists a maxim that resonates with profound implications for transparency and honesty in legal matters: "Fraus Est Celare Fraudem," meaning "to conceal a fraud is to commit a fraud." This aphorism encapsulates a fundamental tenet of law, emphasizing the gravity of attempting to hide or cover up fraudulent activities. What is Fraus Est Celare Fraudem? Fraus Est Celare Fraudem underscores the notion that concealing fraudulent actions compounds the wrongdoing, making one complicit in the original deception. It serves as a reminder that honesty and transparency are paramount in legal dealings, and any attempt to obscure the truth constitutes a perpetuation of fraud. Illustrations of Fraus Est Celare Fraudem This legal maxim finds application across various domains of law, from contract disputes to white-collar crimes. For instance, in contractual agreements, if one party engages in deceitful conduct during the formation or execution of a contract and then endeavors to conceal those actions, they are perpetuating fraud. Similarly, in mortgage-related scenarios involving deception, efforts to conceal fraudulent activities further exacerbate the wrongdoing, reinforcing the principle of "fraus est celare fraudem." Important Judgments: Several landmark cases have affirmed the significance of this maxim in legal jurisprudence. In Budhu Singh And Ors. vs The Board of Revenue and Anr. on 3 May, 1957, the petitioners' counsel contended that the terms "fraud, concealment, or misstatement of facts" in Section 12 of the Acquisition of Privileges Act pertain solely to the claimant's entitlement to a declaration under Section 6. Consequently, these matters must be addressed during the consideration of an application for cancellation. If this interpretation holds, it implies that the authorities do not possess exclusive jurisdiction over the question of tenancy. Similarly, in Venture Global vs. Satyam Computer Services Ltd., the Supreme Court ruled that concealing material facts from an arbitrator constituted fraud and could invalidate the arbitration award. Conclusion Basically, "Fraus Est Celare Fraudem" highlights the importance of honesty and transparency in legal matters. Deception undermines justice, so by embracing this principle, we strengthen the integrity of the legal system and promote fairness and truth. #EasyGST4U

Surprised to see that a £22k fine is one of the Solicitors Regulation Authority "biggest fines against a law firm". The #SRA website confirms: "For solicitors, traditional law firms (recognised bodies or recognised sole practices) and the individuals who work in them, the maximum financial penalty we can impose is £25,000". Larger fines can apparently be levied where cases are referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal but this seems unnecessarily bureaucratic and would add delay. A £22k fine for a law firm can't be an effective deterrent, and potentially didn't even cover the cost of investigating the issue. In the light of the #PostOffice #scandal and #inquiry, the size of fines must surely be changed? #Regulation #justice #integrity

From Mayer Brown: On 26 October 2023, the UK Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 received royal assent and became law. The Act introduces a new strict liability corporate criminal offence of failure to prevent #fraud which, it has just been announced, will come into effect on 1 September 2025. #corporatetransparency #criminalliability #uk #failuretoprevent

🚨 Understanding Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Contracts 📄 A fraudulent misrepresentation is an untrue statement made (i) knowingly, (ii) without belief in its truth, or (iii) recklessly, carelessly, whether it be true or false. From our recent review of contract law, we discovered that the consequences of evidence of fraudulent misrepresentations are significant. ✨ The party that suffered from it may: 1️⃣ Bring an action in tort for damages for deceit. 2️⃣ Bring an action for rescission (with or without a claim for damages). 3️⃣ Repudiate the contract and refuse further performance. 4️⃣ Prosecute or notify the police. 5️⃣ The party deceived may treat the contract as voidable. Additionally, we explored the essentials of the Tort of Deceit, which are as follows: 1️⃣ A statement of fact. 2️⃣ That the maker knew it to be false or had no genuine belief in its truth. 3️⃣ That it was made with the intent that it should be acted upon. 4️⃣ That it was acted upon. 5️⃣ Damage was suffered. 📚 Dive deeper into these concepts and understand the legal ramifications by reading the attached reference, in which I review Fraudulent Misrepresentation as follows: 1️⃣ The distinction between three types of Misrepresentation. 2️⃣ The features common to innocent and fraudulent misrepresentation. 3️⃣ Remedies for fraudulent misrepresentation. 4️⃣ Exemption clauses. 5️⃣ Damages for misrepresentation. 6️⃣ Tort of Deceit. 🔗 Read more about Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Contracts 🔽 💬 Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below! ✔️ Don't forget to follow for more Legal insights and updates. #ContractLaw #FraudulentMisrepresentation #LegalInsights #TortOfDeceit #Contract #LawReview #LegalKnowledge 😉 Enjoy reading! 📖✨

✨Be mindful of untrue statements made by either party while drafting contracts! they can lead to unclear terms and misunderstandings in the contract. Clear communication is key for success! 🧐 📝In this attached document, I have explored the legal ramifications associated with fraudulent misrepresentations in contractual agreements, specifically within the framework of English Law. ✅The discussion includes an analysis of how such misrepresentations can impact the validity of contracts and the potential legal remedies available to affected parties. #contract #drafting #legalinsights #misrepresentation #ContractLaw #Legalknowledge

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) has reformed the law on corporate criminal liability for economic crimes, in particular expanding the scope of the identification doctrine (the legal test for deciding whether the actions of a natural person can be regarded as those of a company). Corporate Solicitor, Olivia McConvey explains below. https://lnkd.in/eKVUaJ5f. #ManchesterLawyers #CorporateLaw #ECCTA #Kuits

Our latest digest of developments including initial reactions to the guidance on establishing reasonable procedures in relation to the ECCTA offence of failure to prevent fraud, an overview of next steps on government plans for company law reform....and more besides. #governance