Mykola Tarapatov’s Post

View profile for Mykola Tarapatov, graphic

Head of GIS services | GIS I LiDAR I GPR | BIM | Digital Twins | 3D digital mapping

𝟑𝐃 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐬. 𝐂𝐀𝐃 𝐃𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬? In the utility sector, the choice between 3D modelling and traditional CAD drawings is more than a technical decision—it’s about matching the method to the project’s needs. Both approaches have unique strengths and applications that cater to different stages of utility design, construction, and maintenance. 🌎 3D Modelling for Utilities 3D modelling is transforming how we approach complex utility networks. It’s particularly effective in subsurface utility projects, where layered data (pipes, cables, terrain) can reveal conflicts and improve planning. It also provides valuable context for future upgrades, maintenance, or urban expansion, integrating seamlessly with GIS and BIM systems. 🌐 CAD Drawings for Utilities CAD drawings remain a reliable solution for documenting layouts, preparing designs for regulatory submissions, and managing smaller-scale projects. Their simplicity and speed make them an essential tool for routine operations and tasks that don’t require spatial depth. What’s the Takeaway? 3D modelling and CAD are not competing approaches—they’re complementary. While 3D modelling is ideal for tackling the complexity of large-scale utility networks, CAD ensures efficient execution of straightforward layouts and regulatory tasks. What approach works best for your utility projects? Share your thoughts or let’s discuss how these methods can be tailored to your needs! #Utility #3DModelling #CADDrawings #GIS #SUE

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics