Australia has expanded its AML/CTF regime to include real estate agents, lawyers, accountants, and precious metals dealers. These reforms, part of the Tranche 2 legislation, aim to close loopholes exploited by criminals to launder illicit funds. The newly regulated sectors must now implement robust reporting and compliance measures and this extension aligns Australia with global AML standards. The Australian Parliament passed AML & CTF Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) (the Bill) on 29 November 2024. As well as simplifying the current AML/CTF regime, the Bill expands the regime’s application to services provided by certain high-risk businesses and professions (‘Tranche 2 entities’), including: real estate professionals and developers; professional services providers such as lawyers, accountants, insolvency and restructuring practitioners, consultants; and dealers in precious metals and stones. When the Tranche 2 entities’ provisions commence on 1 July 2026, the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) (AML/CTF Act) will apply to approximately 70,000 additional businesses, bringing the total reporting entities to 90,000. The Tranche 2 entities amendments to the AML/CTF Act aim to close regulatory gaps and bring Australian law in line with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force. Currently, the absence of AML/CTF requirements for Tranche 2 entities is seen as a weakness in Australia’s AML/CTF framework, leaving these industries vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing risks. Under the new Law, i)- Businesses offering a designed service will need to enrol with AUSTRAC. ii)-AML/CTF policies must be in place before a business can provide designated services, and the business must conduct a risk assessment of its ML/TF/PF risk. iii)-Businesses providing a designated service must appoint an AML/CTF compliance officer to oversee the operation of the entity’s AML/CTF policies and updates. iv)- Tranche 2 entities will need to conduct initial customer due diligence, which includes the collection and verification of a customer’s identity as well as customer risk rating. v)-Tranche 2 entities will need to collect, review and update ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) information, as well as monitor their customers for unusual transactions and behaviours that may give rise to a suspicious matter reporting obligation. They will also be required to conduct enhanced customer due diligence for high risk customers (such as politically exposed persons). vi)- Tranche 2 entities will be required to report certain matters to AUSTRAC, including suspicious matter reports, threshold transaction reports and international value transfer services. vii)-Tranche 2 entities will need to keep certain records of the designated services provided to customers.
Muhammad Khalilullah’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
In case you missed it with the end of year period fast approaching, following on from the reforms to the AML/CTF Act, AUSTRAC recently released a consultation paper on proposed updates to the AML/CTF Rules. Some of the key proposed changes include: - making the Rules easier to navigate by grouping relevant sections together into Parts; - classification according to two rule categories: new General Rules (new rules) and Exemption Rules (existing exemptions to the AML/CTF Act which are being retained); - an emphasis on additional policies and procedures, such as in relation to tipping off prevention safeguards, Board and Senior Management oversight and ensuring a high quality of reporting to AUSTRAC; - the inclusion of definitions for a number of terms contained within the reforms to the AML/CTF Act; - updating CDD requirements, with a focus on practicality and inclusivity for vulnerable groups; - guidance on the concepts of initial CDD and ongoing CDD (including circumstances in which delayed verification is allowed); - expanded requirements for entities involved in value transfer services (including specific policies required, and additional collection and verification requirements, that differ according to the entity's role); and - narrowing the focus of TM requirements (instead of an 'all crimes' approach to TM, rules should focus on monitoring for ML/TF, Proliferation Financing and serious ML predicate offences). The proposed reforms aim to streamline compliance while emphasising accountability. Refer to the Consultation paper for full details on the proposed changes: https://lnkd.in/gsfv58Yr . Feel free to reach out to any of us if you have any questions or would like to discuss these proposed changes Steven Blackburn, Hong-Viet Nguyen, Samantha Carroll, Jonathan Gordon
Public consultation on new AML/CTF Rules
austrac.gov.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Summary about the FinCEN Proposed new Rule: 📍FIs to conduct periodical risk assessments to measure AML/CFT risks e.g National Priorities; 📍FIs to designate a qualified AML/CFT officer for independent testing with ongoing employee training 📍Expand requirements related to the establishment and oversight of an FI’s AML/CFT program. SOURCES https://lnkd.in/eEHPakiQ
FinCEN Proposes Rule To Strengthen US Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Programs | Insights | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
skadden.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Effective implementation of Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) measures is crucial for DNFBPs and VASPs operating in the UAE. For this purpose, DNFBPs and VASPs must draft and implement their internal AML/CFT policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the UAE AML/CFT Laws. This article delves into the essential components and best practices necessary for crafting robust AML/CFT policies and procedures. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how DNFBPs and VASPs can mitigate risks associated with money laundering, financing terrorism, and proliferation financing while ensuring compliance with UAE federal regulations. For a better understanding, check out the entire blog now! Article Link: https://lnkd.in/dd_mQ_R8 #AML #AMLCFT #AMLCompliance #AntiMoneyLaundering #DNFBPs #Compliance #Risk #AMLPolicy #AMLCFTPolicy
Crafting Effective AML/CFT Policies: Best Practices for UAE DNFBPs and VASPs
https://rapidaml.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Luxembourg: Administrative sanction imposed on BGL BNP Paribas for severe AML shortcomings On 8 July 2024, the CSSF informed the public that it had imposed an administrative fine of 3 million Euro against BGL BNP Paribas S.A. for non-compliance with professional obligations related to anti-money laundering / counter financing of terrorist (AML/CFT) on 8 May 2024. The administrative fine followed an inspection carried out by the CSSF between May and November 2021 covering certain aspects of the AML/CFT and internal governance frameworks in relation with a limited number of files belonging to a group of related clients. During the inspection, the CSSF identified severe breaches of AML/CFT obligations related in particular the following circumstances: • The implementation of enhanced due diligence related to the source of funds and wealth of the clients concerned was deficient and did not provide the credit institution with complete, consistent and duly documented information. This constituted, in view of the level of risk of the clients concerned, a failure to comply with the obligation to take additional measures to establish the source of wealth and of funds involved in business relationships that present a higher risk of money laundering and terrorist financing (ML / TF). • The ongoing due diligence applied to the monitoring of transactions was deficient and therefore did not enable the credit institution to identify unusual or suspicious transactions, in particular when these transactions were not in line with the expected transactions on the accounts. • The credit institution's lack of vigilance regarding the group of related clients, of which certain clients were subject to adverse press articles, prevented it from informing promptly the Cellule de Renseignement Financier (CRF, the Luxembourg's FIU) on its own initiative of suspicious activities and/or transactions. • By closing certain business relationships being part of the relevant group of related clients (and thus transferring their assets outside the credit institution), despite having sufficient indicia, which as such generated suspicions of money laundering, without first informing the CRF. • The communication with the client by a limited number of employees that a blocking was in place further to the instruction of the CRF, without the client having sought himself to obtain information, constituted a violation of the prohibition of tipping-off. • The credit institution's internal organisation regarding the validation and/or maintaining of business relationships with a limited number of clients who presented a higher risk of ML / TF was deficient and did not allow sufficient involvement of the credit institution's responsible persons for AML/CFT matters.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
On Tuesday, Members of the European Parliament adopted a resolution rejecting the proposal by the European Commission to remove the UAE, Gibraltar, Panama, Barbados, and Uganda from the list of third countries at high risk with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT). Earlier in March 2024, the European Commission had considered the proposal to remove the UAE, Gibraltar, Panama, Barbados, and Uganda from this list (following measures previously taken by FATF, which removed the UAE, Gibraltar, Barbados, and Uganda from the "grey list" in February 2024; and Panama in October 2023). However, on April 23, Members of the European Parliament overwhelmingly voted to reject the Commission's stance on all these countries: 490 voted against the proposal, 64 in favor, and 56 abstained. It is expected that these countries will remain on the EU list at least until September 2024. The Commission is unlikely to challenge the decision of the European Parliament, dealing a blow to the Commission's stated goal of aligning this EU list with the FATF watchlist. A special EU observer is currently visiting the UAE this week. New AML provisions: On April 24, the European Parliament adopted a new AML package, including the 6th AML Directive (AMLD 6), the common European AML regulations (AMLR), and the regulatory body for AML issues (AMLAR). The provision on fund transfers, which was part of the initial package, was separated from the rest and already adopted in June 2023. Once the legislative instruments are formally adopted by the Council and published in the Official Journal of the EU, the CSSF will provide more detailed information on the changes resulting from the new AML package. The new provisions ensure that individuals with a legitimate interest, including journalists, media professionals, civil society organizations, competent authorities, and supervisory bodies, will have immediate, direct, and free access to information on beneficial ownership held in national registers and interconnected at the EU level. In addition to current information, the registers will also include data for a period of at least five years. The laws also grant financial intelligence units (FIUs) more powers to analyze and identify cases of money laundering and terrorist financing, as well as to suspend suspicious transactions. Details can be found by this link: https://lnkd.in/gpTnHZcQ Our team are always ready to provide high-quality consultation and help you solve your tasks. Follow our page for further notification and articles or write to us on Email/WhatsApp/Viber/Telegram +380 98 363 6493, or call us. #EuropeanParliament #AML #CFT #FATF #Compliance #Regulation #FinancialIntelligence #FinancialCrime #CorporateServices #FinancialRegulation #AMLCompliance #FinancialSecurity #CorporateCompliance #FinancialTransparency
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The creation of an EU Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) is a major part of our legislative package to strengthen the fight against financial crime, which the Council and Parliament recently approved. AMLA will be a decentralised EU agency that will coordinate national authorities to ensure the correct and consistent application of EU rules. It will also directly supervise selected financial sector entities that operate on cross-border basis and present high risk of money laundering and terrorism financing. We at the Commission are now working on setting up the new Authority. A dedicated task force, based in DG FISMA, has been coordinating the preparatory steps to ensure that the first decisions and actions can be taken effectively and rapidly following the publication of the AMLA Regulation, which happened yesterday on 19 June. Our role in this process is to translate the legal framework into an institutional reality. This includes arranging what the new Authority will need to operate, for example facilities, IT infrastructure, and the recruitment of administrative and operational staff, as well as pre-selecting AMLA’s top leadership. Policy decisions will then be taken by the future principals themselves. In other words, we will be here for a provisional period to give birth to the new Authority which will then take on a life of its own. As part of these preparatory efforts, we are currently running a recruitment campaign for the first AMLA chair, who will be the legal representative and public face of the Authority. By chairing the meetings of the General Board and Executive Board, they will lead the strategic planning and direction of the Authority. In case you are an experienced professional in the AML sector or know someone who is, here is the vacancy – applications are open until 8 July: https://lnkd.in/eeMiGkfd The aim is that AMLA will be able to start most of its activities in mid-2025. The Authority will expand from zero staff today to 120 by the end of 2025 and to around 430 by the end of 2027. It will then begin direct supervision of 40 high-risk financial sector entities in 2028. The annual budget of the Authority from 2028 onwards is estimated at EUR 92 million – approximately 70% of which will come from financial contributions paid by a range of financial sector obliged entities. If you would like to find out more about the new Authority, including the professional profiles that it will be recruiting, take a look at our new web page: https://lnkd.in/e4h-PaFz I am most grateful to Olivier Salles, the head of our task force, and his entire team for their tireless efforts to bring AMLA into life in such a short time.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔝 What are the key elements of an AML audit? In our previous post, we introduced the concept of an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) audit. Now, let's delve deeper into the essential components that make up this critical process. An AML audit should encompass several key elements to ensure that the institution's practices align with legal requirements and best practices for countering money laundering and terrorism financing. 📃 Firstly, it involves a thorough verification of the institution's compliance with AML regulations. This step ensures that all activities adhere to the current legal framework designed to prevent financial crimes. 🔔 Next, the audit should include an analysis of the institution's strengths and weaknesses in AML. This assessment helps identify areas where the institution is performing well and where improvements are needed. 💵 Identifying areas most vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing is another crucial aspect. By pinpointing these areas, the institution can focus its resources more effectively to mitigate potential threats. 💡 The audit should also involve a detailed analysis of the institution's actual AML obligations, along with recommendations for how these obligations can be better implemented. This may include checking existing procedures and internal documents, suggesting necessary corrections and additions, and verifying the processes, systems, and documents related to the identification and assessment of AML risks. 💼 Additionally, the audit should review the activities and competencies of individuals responsible for AML within the institution, including those overseeing internal controls. Maintaining a robust AML framework necessitates the proper training and equipping of these individuals to handle AML responsibilities. 💰 Finally, the audit should culminate in the development of practical recommendations based on the findings. These recommendations will guide the institution in enhancing its AML processes, ultimately strengthening its defences against money laundering and terrorism financing. By following the above-mentioned guidelines, an AML audit provides a comprehensive review and actionable insights that help institutions maintain compliance and protect against financial crime. #aml #cft #amlaudit #amlcompliance #complianceofficer #moneylaundering #antimoneylaundering #counteringfinancingterrorism #combatingfinancingterrorism #financialcompliance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What should organisations focus on while conducting AML audits in order to stay compliant and secure against money laundering and terrorism financing? Our latest post breaks down the key components of an AML audit and explains each of the elements. Dive in to learn how AML audits help identify vulnerabilities and strengthen defences! #aml #cft #amlaudit #amlcompliance #complianceofficer #moneylaundering #antimoneylaundering #counteringfinancingterrorism #combatingfinancingterrorism #financialcompliance
🔝 What are the key elements of an AML audit? In our previous post, we introduced the concept of an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) audit. Now, let's delve deeper into the essential components that make up this critical process. An AML audit should encompass several key elements to ensure that the institution's practices align with legal requirements and best practices for countering money laundering and terrorism financing. 📃 Firstly, it involves a thorough verification of the institution's compliance with AML regulations. This step ensures that all activities adhere to the current legal framework designed to prevent financial crimes. 🔔 Next, the audit should include an analysis of the institution's strengths and weaknesses in AML. This assessment helps identify areas where the institution is performing well and where improvements are needed. 💵 Identifying areas most vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing is another crucial aspect. By pinpointing these areas, the institution can focus its resources more effectively to mitigate potential threats. 💡 The audit should also involve a detailed analysis of the institution's actual AML obligations, along with recommendations for how these obligations can be better implemented. This may include checking existing procedures and internal documents, suggesting necessary corrections and additions, and verifying the processes, systems, and documents related to the identification and assessment of AML risks. 💼 Additionally, the audit should review the activities and competencies of individuals responsible for AML within the institution, including those overseeing internal controls. Maintaining a robust AML framework necessitates the proper training and equipping of these individuals to handle AML responsibilities. 💰 Finally, the audit should culminate in the development of practical recommendations based on the findings. These recommendations will guide the institution in enhancing its AML processes, ultimately strengthening its defences against money laundering and terrorism financing. By following the above-mentioned guidelines, an AML audit provides a comprehensive review and actionable insights that help institutions maintain compliance and protect against financial crime. #aml #cft #amlaudit #amlcompliance #complianceofficer #moneylaundering #antimoneylaundering #counteringfinancingterrorism #combatingfinancingterrorism #financialcompliance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Swiss AML/CFT Regulations - Post Ahoy 💡 Articles 305bis (Money laundering), 305ter (Insufficient diligence in financial transactions and right to report), 322ter (Bribery of Swiss public officials), 322quater (Acceptance of bribes), 322septies (Bribery of foreign public officials), 260quinquies (Financing terrorism) of the Swiss Criminal Code (SCC); 💡 AMLA (SR 955.0; Federal Act of 10 October 1997 on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) ; 💡 AMLO-FINMA (SR 955.033.0; FINMA Ordinance of 3 June 2015); 💡 Swiss banks' code of conduct with regard to the exercise of due diligence (CDB 20); 💡(SR 955.01 - Federal Council Ordinance of 11 November 2015 on Combating Money and Laundering and Terrorist Financing). Have you ever stopped and wondered. ⁉ "Are periodic reviews meant to be every 1 year for High risk and medium to low 2 years, or is it 3 years?" ⁉ "Should we discontinue the business relationship with the corporate/retail client or not, is this even my decision to make?" ⁉ "This escalation looks only slightly suspicious, although it meets our minimum requirements to file a SAR I feel its lacking substance, should I file this with the MROS anyway. What if it returns back as a false positives/negative?" ⁉ "How long after the relationship has ended can we retain customer information?" ⁉ "I have filed a SAR and am waiting for a response by the respected authority - Should we allow the suspected account/user to continue transacting?" I believe we have asked these at some point in time, and even more people will soon ask these questions in their careers especially #mlro and #compliance folk. 🌍 From the perspective of Switzerland - Excl. UK for now. For those 5 specific questions here are my responses as per regulations in Switzerland: ✅ Periodic reviews are generally conducted annually for high-risk business relationships, while medium to low-risk relationships undergo reviews every three years. ✅ The decision to discontinue a business relationship should align with regulatory requirements. This is a complicated and delicate decision that has more than several factors to consider-Should I make a post on this? ✅ Even if a SAR escalation seems only slightly suspicious this is sufficient grounds to file. Firms (FIs must have guidelines aligned to the requirements of their respective jurisdictions such as a SAR form). ✅ In Switzerland, subject to AML, FIs must retain docs for 10 years post end of the business relationship. ✅ Post reporting to MROS, while their analysis takes place, you may continue to execute client orders for the reported assets until notified by MROS that the report was forwarded to the prosecution authority. Client orders involving significant assets in a form that allows traceable transactions are allowed. More info available... Found this insightful? Comment & Share. https://lnkd.in/eK4gURUj #risk #aml #complianceofficers #banking #payments #regulation #euregulations #
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚩Europe to adopt a "single AML rulebook"🚩 🤝It seems that the Parliament and the Council, after 9 months, has reached an agreement for a AML/CFT regulation with the intention to harmonize all member states rules and strengthen those set out in the Directives. ⏳It is to remember that an action plan to fight against money laundering and counterfighting financing of terrorism was announced early in May 2020. Following this announcement, no more than a year later the Commission presented a package of 4 legislative proposals, being one of them a proposal for a regulation on the prevention of the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing of terrorism. Additionally this legislative package includes: 1️⃣ a Directive, 2️⃣ the creation of an EU Authority for AML/CFT, and 3️⃣ a recast of the regulation expanding traceability requirements to crypto-assets. 📑The objective of this regulation would be to replace the EU directives minimum standards with a single AML playbook which would reinforce member states efforts when fighting against ML and FT. Additionally, amongst others it is to highlight that this proposal seeks: ▶︎ to establish an EU single rulebook on AML/CFT, ▶︎ to ensure consistency and effectiveness across Member States, ▶︎ to mitigate risks, including emerging risks like crypto-assets, crowdfunding platforms, and migration operators, ▶︎ to strengthen due diligence measures, reporting of suspicious transactions, and enforcement of criminal law provisions. 🔍Which are the main provisions to consider (at least, IMO) of this proposal? 1️⃣ CASPs to be obligued entities, 2️⃣ streamline beneficial owners requirements across the EU member states, 3️⃣ transaction in cash would be restricted to EUR 10,000 4️⃣ it would set an a EU common approach to third countries with little to no provisions on AML/CFT 🔗 You can find the proposal here: https://lnkd.in/dZ9YBpxV 📚 Main references: ▶︎ https://lnkd.in/daFn3-ew ▶︎ https://lnkd.in/dMNBriQC
Choose the experimental features you want to try
eur-lex.europa.eu
To view or add a comment, sign in