Marc Lawrence’s Post

Here’s something I’m not thrilled about: congestion pricing in NYC. I understand the need to fund infrastructure and improve the subways, but charging $9 a day to drive south of 60th Street in Manhattan feels counterproductive. Right now, Manhattan is already facing a significant drop-off in midweek workers, especially on Mondays and Fridays, as remote and hybrid work redefine office life. Instead of incentivizing people to return, this feels like a deterrent. Yes, I get the argument for reducing cars and encouraging public transportation, but is this the right solution? What really hits home for me is how this impacts young professionals like my 24-year-old daughter, who reverse commutes out of Manhattan for work. She’s now looking at an additional $50/week cost on top of high rent and parking fees. It’s tough enough to get ahead in the city without these extra costs. What are your thoughts on congestion pricing? Is it the right move, or should NYC explore other ways to balance revenue and accessibility?

  • No alternative text description for this image

📌we need to get things right in NYC - Mayor Marc!?

I was disgusted when I heard that NY was trying to institute this policy and thrilled when it was put on pause. Now that the elections have passed, the idea has come back to life. You cannot tax your way to prosperity and adding an additional transportation cost for the most active part of Manhattan is one of the worst ideas I’ve ever heard. And I was surprised when there wasn’t 100% backlash to this tax coming. I’m my opinion, individuals who ride bikes in New York from citi bikes to delivery drivers are the most law breaking demographic of transporter in Manhattan. I work in a fast paced industry where at times I may need to jump in a cab or drive my car for work, it’s almost impossible to take public transportation 100% of the time. I also work in the logistics field and the an additional cost to trucking will only increase costs on my business and my clients. As someone whose business is tied to CRE, additional costs and taxes are the wrong policy. This is an example of how bad policy hurts business and individuals. I would like Governor Hocul to spend a day getting around Manhattan paying for transportation out of her own pocket and tell me this is good policy.

NY is the most indebted state in the nation and the citizens keep electing ---- to run the place??? New York holds the highest debt burden among all states, exceeding $203.77 billion so maybe cutting spending would be a better option than trying to create new revenue sources. Option 2 is to get more moving trucks for Florida/Texas/NJ/CT business relocations so the city can use the empty office buildings for housing homeless.

Iain Robertson

ICT Manager, United Nations

1mo

So.....if you look at the cars on the streets any weekday morning, a lot of it is Uber and Lyft........they say these cars run without passengers 40% of the time.......it's time to limit the number. I'd estimate 30% of cars are for hire taxis. This would go a long way to solving the issue. Secondly MTA is a deeply corrupt organization. It uses expensive, corrupt lawyers to cover up bus drivers who break the law and almost kill people on crosswalks. It is hugely wasteful. It is badly run. If all fares were collected it would already have $600M. That and cut waste and fraud, fire management and you'd get to 1Billion easily, probably more, a year without congestion pricing. Giving the MTA more money will only lead to even more fraud and corruption and waste. The city is struggling with the effects of hybrid work. That's taken a lot of workers out of the city. If the city was serious about reducing congestion, it would allow more of its own NYC workers to work from home. The flip side is the city is not the place it used to be and allowing more hybrid work will put the city even further back. There are so many vacant stores now. Creating more costs in NYC is the last thing NYC needs with the here to stay hybrid working.

Joshua Ra

Digital Asset Intel (WHOIS/pDNS) for Cybersecurity Products & Quant Models

1mo

Biggest difference between what this looks like in NYC and those of European counterparts is that this toll increase is being put in place to address the "deficit" that the MTA operates on (despite $18.6B of budget in 2022), which has been largely due to increased de-centralization of operations and unionization, constantly increasing cost of work/service. I don't see how increasing revenue will address this matter, and certainly see how this effort can result in unions increasing their costs (knowing NYC has more revenue to pull from)

Larry Ross

Commercial RE Professional

1mo

Another horrible move by this governor, which is no surprise, penalizing those that work and contribute to the city's economy. That said, this seems like more of a play to leverage additional funds for MTA from the new administration, IMO. There are still lawsuits pending against it, so not sure how quickly this gets implemented, if at all. Traffic is a major issue, but always has been. I don't feel congestion pricing will be that much of a deterrent. I don't see the needle moving too much on that front. Just more money for an ineffective MTA resulting in higher salaries. Alittle bit of a tangent, but the cars are dirtier than ever, service is still relatively inconsistent and there is a complete lack of security on the train.

I believe that NYC should investugate the corrupt practices of the MTA execs. Prices rise, as there is essentially no better service in these times. Literally EVERYTHING attacks the middleclass. From city taxes, commute costs, parking, rent, etc. You literally have to pay to work, instead of work to get paid. Now to own a vehicle is considered a luxury, instead of a necessity. This congestion pricing would only encourage remote work or WFH, instead of RTO, unless the business isnt in NYC.

Evan Green

Liberator | Entrepreneur | 2x Founder | Consultant | Author of Liberation Day: Quit Your Job and Escape the Corporate Trap | Corporate Liberation Podcast | Bitcoin Believer ₿ | 🇺🇸

1mo

Marc Lawrence Such policy borders on insanity. New York City is already the most taxed or close to the most taxed location in the US. This amounts to yet another tax. Plus, why would you want to prevent people from traveling as they wish to come into your city and spend money? That is not only a slight against personal freedom, but also anti-competitive and un-economic. While this toll may be meaningless for high income people, middle income people will now be priced out of the ability to drive into the city. Let the free market work!

Michael Dragone

Director Commercial Sales

1mo

Extremely frustrating...The MTA (Money Taking Agency) needs to learn how to run a business! They could start by insisting everyone pays to use the service, that would close at least 250 million of the gap!

they have been working hard on keeping ny-er's out of nyc for over 12+ years now. congestion pricing is stupid. It does not address the actual problem: corruption, bad management, unsustainable business model and many inefficiencies. It is already subsidized and STILL not working. very bad sign. lack of leadership and accountability. They fired all the toll collectors, and then the toll price more than doubled, someone is making money somewhere. GWB alone makes over $2,700,000.00 PER DAY in tolls. but they need your $9.00 the volume (and revenue) used to be higher with the $8.00 toll than the $17.53 toll (by mail), go figure. imagine that.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics