Mike B.’s Post

View profile for Mike B., graphic

Project Manager | Business Development | Business Analytics

I was just having this conversation with a few people the other day. The Marine Corps is just implementing a written policy for what the other services have been doing quietly--Limiting SkillBridge. But when your organizations are at 76% strength or less (more) and you have a mission to perform (the one the American taxpayers are paying for) something has to give....SkillBridge will be the first. And before you go there I am a huge fan of SkillBridge...but I am also a realist--->What we are witnessing is the slow decline and ultimate phasing out of the DoD SkillBridge program as we know it. I have been saying this for a few years now and you can argue all day but the program as is, is not sustainable nor will it survive as is. I am also not a fan of using rank to determine who gets SkillBridge (I know it is done quietly as well.) The assumption being made is that senior enlisted and officers do not need to use it to make the transition. Nonsense. They need it as much as the junior enlisted need it. There is no rank in the transition. True, some (junior enlisted and officer) will have it easier but that goes for anything in life. The transition is the transition and it does not know rank. https://lnkd.in/enWXy676

INTERIM GUIDANCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SKILLBRIDGE PROGRAM

INTERIM GUIDANCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SKILLBRIDGE PROGRAM

marines.mil

Joe Paschall, Sr.

Chief Operating Officer (COO) at nLogic

6mo

Agreed on all. Anything that is such a good deal as SkillsBridge is going to go thru a lifecycle phase from underutilized to broadly marketed to overutilized to pared down. It's a natural course of events and we all know we don't pay for a force that is 125% strength just so 25% can be on SkillsBridge at any one time. Regardless, SkillsBridge has strengthened the relationships with industry and this will help future Transitioners. Besides that, many of us transitioned successfully years before SkillsBridge existed. With or without this program - and even TAP - those who put forth the effort will transition well, and those who do not will not.

Eric Yager

Engineering Leader || Remote Work Advocate || ex-Amazon, Dell, USASOC

6mo

When I got out, the only reason I did was that I attended a job fair and first was introduced to skillbridge. The second I heard my income potential given, admittedly, niche experience at the time while attending that job fair I set a goal of getting out ASAP. Had I not gone, and had skillbridge not been a thing (albeit fledgling at the time), I'd probably be a crusty old LTC pining for retirement right now instead of getting out as an hours-old field grade (literally pinned on ETS date). It was always a bit strange to me that the military offered paid internships in industry with the sole focus of job transition, I don't like that its fading as it is but I 10000% understand it.

Jason Sikora, PMP, CBAP

Director of Veteran Services | Solution Architect & Problem Solver | Over 21 Years Leading Teams of 200+ Employees

6mo

I'm pragmatic about the program. You're right. It is not sustainable as is. They could sustain it at a 90-day program, which is roughly the same as a summer internship for college students. It's just hard to see popular programs get whittled down and removed over time.

Needs of the Service will always dictate in the Corps. The high-bar barrier to some (those in CAT-III) is “Category III participation cannot result in a gapped billet.” Most PCS’s are summertime. CAT-III should consider their retirement request date carefully to give them the best chance of their replacement being on-board 90-days prior to their terminal leave start date (end of 90-day CAT-III SkillBridge). 90-days is still a high-bar of hope that a CAT-III’s replacement is on-board to prevent a gapped billet.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics