Matt Kloos’ Post

View profile for Matt Kloos, graphic

Co-Founder & CFO at rather.chat | Leveraging WhatsApp & AI (think ChatGPT) to transform customer experiences | Actuary Turned Startup Founder | Passionate Triathlete | Devoted Dad

When raising funds for startups, you inevitably bump up against the Goldilocks question: How much capital is juussst right? Too much or too little can both be a problem, and many founders struggle with this balancing act. Raising too much can breed complacency. With a pile of cash in the bank, startups risk losing their edge, become lax with spending, and veer off course with unnecessary experiments. Keeping it lean forces you to be sharp. With limited resources, every decision matters. You build a smaller, scrappier team and find creative ways to solve problems. Of course, there's a risk of being underfunded and lacking the runway to hit critical milestones. At rather.chat, we're keen to explore joint ventures and partnerships, as this opens up resources and synergies without compromising what works. If you'd like to discuss this further, please DM me.    But tell me, how do you strike the capital sweet spot? I'd love to hear your stories from the trenches!

  • No alternative text description for this image
Scholtz Van Heerden (MBA)

Professional Problem Solver | Human-centric Business Process Engineer | SCRUM Master

1mo

I wonder if there is some sort of formula for this: scalability of product vs. market size, factored against current costs of operation, including future product roadmap, and using market growth as a minimum base value for growth potential. Just ideas some ideas. Also interested to see what others think.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics