Mark Whittaker’s Post

The Scientific LinkedIn community has had a lot of discussions regarding data falsification. These are not a new phenomenon. One of the most striking in regard to human impact occurred with the Minnesota Coronary Study, led by Ansell Keys, (the "7 country study") to test the hypothesis that a replacement diet removing saturated fats in favor of polyunsaturated (and as an aside, net supplementation in the diet of carbohydrate rich foods) led to lower levels of cholesterol, lower low density lipoprotein, and improved cardiac outcomes. The study never released full data packets, but it resulted in the demonization of red meat and healthy protein sources and the popularization of the AMA good health stamp on carbohydrate and sugar rich breakfast cereals. It was not until after Keys' collaborators death that all of the data became available and could be reanalyzed. What came out of this was the observation that Keys cherrypicked the data to fit his model and discarded results from countries that did not have the outcome he hypothesized. The "7 country" study was actually a "20 country" study but 13 countries, including France, were contrary. Keys did great work in the area of human nutrition (his K rations were important toward supporting our troops and preventing starvation after WWII) but he let his bias impact his results, and we are only now restructuring the so called, high carbohydrate "food pyramid." Yes, there is a lot of value in unsaturates and polyunsaturates in diet, but this needs to be contextualized with saturates and their role in nutrient availability and lipoprotein and hormone regulation, glucose intolerance, protein uptake, and the balance of critical nutrients. He shoehorned a simplistic model by limited data analysis and outlier exclusion in a biased manner in what is actually an extremely complex and evolutionarily adapted survival mechanism.

I think it's important that we should be cautious of any "eat this, not that" diet. Humans are the product of millenia of adaptive evolution toward omnivory. Common sense needs to be the rule.

Like
Reply
John Osthus

Agriculture Advocate | Marketing Innovator | Farm Ecosystem Scientist | My mission is more farm revenue, healthier ecosystems, and more people fed from each bushel. Let’s connect!

3w

This post matters because digital reports about farm and food dangers are frequently exaggerated. Unless a university or commercial agronomist, livestock nutritionist, or farmer has posted something positive or research related, agricultural ‘science’ on the Internet is no more clear than Covid or fog.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics