I hope that those of you interested in innovation, regional development, smart specialisation and the performance of different public administrations will find this article, authored with Fabrizio Guzzo and Carlo Gianelle, of interest! It has just been published in "Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research". We examine how governments from different administrative traditions reformed their innovation policy governance following the adoption of the Smart Specialisation approach of EU cohesion policy for the 2014–2020 funding period. Based on four case studies from Germany, Italy, Poland and Slovenia, we find that different administrative settings played a role in the uptake of intended governance reforms and that the S3 conditionality was not sufficient to guarantee substantial change in the absence of continuing political and bureaucratic support. Our analysis supports the idea that governments and administrations which were already better aligned with the Smart Specialisation logic may have had limited incentive to update their governance structures, while those less aligned with it appeared sincerely motivated to overhaul existing arrangements, yet without proving capable of sustaining the desired changes. Our conclusions lead us to formulate both policy and theoretical recommendations about the use of ex ante conditionalities. The article has been published OPEN ACCESS, so feel free to dive in! https://lnkd.in/eRfrgnRZ
Interesting that you chose Slovenia 🙂
Consultant and Adviser sustainable regional policy and innovation
7moCongratulations Laura Polverari! A very interesting read. I was especially struck by:’ In all of our cases, governance change has been promoted or resisted by the actors involved – politicians and bureaucrats, but in some cases also firms – based on their perception of the value-added and cost-opportunity of change’. It is difficult to counter-argue resistance because we have still such limited evidence of how S3 impacts innovation, productivity, economic performance. It remains difficult to encourage reform without cushioning the costs and better promoting the output benefits (such as improved connection to other innovation actors and more seamless access to S3 support and innovation opportunities).