Lande Spottswood’s Post

View profile for Lande Spottswood, graphic

M&A Partner at Vinson & Elkins

Anjli Raval has a thought provoking piece in the Financial Times today, asking if founder-led companies are too often ungovernable in ways that hurt the company. I am ambivalent on the question. When a founder has enough hard or soft power to essentially select the board, there are clearly heightened risks of bad or conflicted decisions; and there are plenty of colorful examples out there. But while a founder controlled company may be more likely to do the wrong thing instead of the safe thing, compared to fully independent boards, I think fully independent boards are more likely to do the safe thing instead of the right thing, by the same comparison. From behind a veil of ignorance, I think I would look for strong economic alignment and expertise before squeaky clean independence, but also avoid founders who seem to be disdainful of their duties to stockholders.

Are directors of founder-led companies being set up to fail?

Are directors of founder-led companies being set up to fail?

ft.com

Johnny Nel .

Growth Partner (CGO) Accept Your Invite to a Short Weekly Newsletter: How to Lead Effectively, Build Agile High-Performing Businesses & Develop Influence Powerfully👇

2mo

Lande Spottswood, complex matter. Founder passion risky, but independence risks caution?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics