three really good takeaways here. read on...
Data, learning & gender integration to scale impact for companies & investors | Skillset: mixed methods research + continuous improvement
My first New York Climate Week included many intense, wonderful, and eye-opening panels and conversations. I loved chatting with many new and old colleagues who bring so much energy and passion to this space 🤩 ! But I also wanted to hear many speakers go beyond context and high-level comments and tell me more about processes and outcomes! And so, in the spirit of let's get messy, here are my takeaways: 1. No matter where I went, everyone talked about partnerships, and rightfully so; however, it was limited to benefits rather than the challenges of executing and operationalizing multi-stakeholder partnership models. What were your decision frameworks? How did you manage power dynamics? What were your communication tools? Similarly, there was so much buzz around systems thinking and just transitions, but most of these conversations also stayed high-level. Especially, regarding breaking down power dynamics, a core tenet of systems thinking, or system and community reform necessary for just transitions. Often, I found folks speaking about multi-pillar programming or impacts based on interrelationships. Great -- yes, I love that, but also tell me more, and let's dive deeper! (And so, watch for upcoming posts where I share some of my favourite systems thinking resources.) 2. There remains a need and questions within organizations of all sizes on -- data (not limited to impact data but also on data collection, analysis, and utilization, while facing resource issues and managing pre-competitive versus competitive data and compliance regulations) and -- capacity-building (business skills, mentorship, and soft skills for entrepreneurs, especially women, to hack away at systemic barriers— and for the workforce, especially for a just transition when working closely with communities). I also had wonderful conversations on the need for capacity building among funders and investors to reduce the distance between them and the end stakeholders so that these groups better understand each other. We need more of this to be brought up and out! And at least on community engagement: there is already so much work done in participatory research that can jump silos/sectors. (Watch for upcoming posts on some of my favourite participatory eval resources!) 3. Several organizations discussed the need for co-creating hyper-local solutions with local stakeholders. While this is highly effective for impact, they shared that scaling these products/programs was challenging. But what about the principles and processes used to develop these products/programs—could those be scaled, and how? Tell me more! We can and should get down to sharing the messy details and outcomes (whether stellar or failed) because how else will we collectively work on this urgent poly-crisis and reform/strengthen systems piece by piece? #NYCC #ClimateWeek #systemslens #impinv #sgbs #smes #NYCC24 #NewYorkClimateWeek
Absolutely cannot agree with #1 enough.
Data, learning & gender integration to scale impact for companies & investors | Skillset: mixed methods research + continuous improvement
2moThank you for re-posting! Here's to folks willing to share the messy details so we can all learn, execute, and avoid the same pitfalls.