Kimberly Carleson’s Post

View profile for Kimberly Carleson, graphic

Chief Executive Officer

Lawsuit Serves as Reminder to Employers A recently filed lawsuit targets group health plan fiduciary obliga- tions under ERISA and focuses on the “duty of prudence” when select- ing and monitoring health plan vendors. The lawsuit alleges that the plan participants and beneficiaries were harmed by paying increased plan costs because of these fidu- ciary breaches. Although this case is pending, it is a reminder to employ- ers sponsoring group health plans – especially self-insured health plans – to review their ERISA fiduciary obligations while maintaining robust processes and procedures. In the February 5 complaint, participants alleged that group health plan fiduciaries at Johnson & Johnson breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by allowing the plan and its participants to pay “extraordinary” costs for prescrip- tion drugs as compared to other market options, resulting in millions of dollars in unnecessary costs to the plan. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that the health plan fiduciaries mis- managed the plan’s prescription drug benefits. That allegedly cost the plan and its employees “millions of dollars in the form of higher payments for prescription drugs, higher premiums, higher deductibles, higher coinsur- ance, higher copays, and lower wages or limited wage growth.” The participants alleged the plan’s fiduciaries failed to: • Pay the lowest possible costs for the offered drugs; • Obtain competitive bids from other prescription drug service providers; • Monitor plan expenses; • Negotiate the prescription drug contract with its pharmacy ben- efit manager (PBM), especially given its bargaining power as a Fortune 50 employer; • Fully inform participants about the mail-order program, where drug prices were routinely higher than options at retail pharma- cies; or • Protect the health plan’s assets. The complaint gave specific examples of these “extraordinary” costs. For instance, the plaintiffs claimed that the PBM charged the plan over $10,000 for a 90-day sup- ply of a generic drug used to treat multiple sclerosis. This same drug was allegedly available without using insurance at various online and retail pharmacies for well under $100. The plan participants are asking for various remedies while also seek- ing to hold the fiduciaries personally liable under ERISA for their actions and inactions. The Johnson & Johnson lawsuit is one of the first of its kind, stemming from the disclosure and transparency in coverage requirements – but it mirrors the retirement plan excessive fee lawsuits that have come before it. As a fiduciary, it is your duty to act on behalf of the plan. Paying bills without reviewing them is not prudent. US Beacon identifies ineligible charges in 99% of the bills we review. https://lnkd.in/gBNyP_qn

new-erisa-class-actions-zero-in-on-group-health-jenny-kiesewetter-employee-benefit-plan-review.pdf

new-erisa-class-actions-zero-in-on-group-health-jenny-kiesewetter-employee-benefit-plan-review.pdf

fisherphillips.com

Brian Gregory, MD, MBA

ORTimes.org - Healthcare: Expert integration of data, risk management, and clinical, finance; 25+yr MD- Anesthesia & ICU; 2yr MBA: Risk mgmt, Data mgmt, Finance mgmt; TOC, Lean, 6sigma

6mo

Impressive! One of the core focuses in my 2yr MBA was risk management, another was finance. Both would have caught this. My question would be ‘who’ -which person- missed this, and was it on purpose of just lack of background to catch such things. — A simple routine bar-chart or graph comparing ‘common costs’ with those of a contract for services would have made this visible in 1 second. Again…who’s in charge here? Where’s the CFO? Where are the data analysts? The buck stops at the CE0…but does (s)he have ‘real’ background experience, or is just good at talking and shaking hands?

Patrick W. Hull

Sales Consultant- US Beacon- Partnering with employers, trusts, municipalities, brokers & Consultants to deliver medical claims integrity reviews and peerless cost containment strategies.

6mo

The number of breaches by the plans Fiduciary personnel indicate complete incompetence. It’s beyond sad and it’s the absolute right course of action by the plan’s participants to seek indemnification . The outcome of this decision by the courts could set a new precedence regarding ERISA fiduciary obligations!

Welcome to the brave new world of transparency!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics