Kelly Whelan’s Post

View profile for Kelly Whelan, graphic

Business Development Sales Professional

May this article open a few more eyes to the agenda of lies we have been fed over the past few years.

View profile for Eva Chipiuk, graphic

Lawyer/Entrepreneur, B.Sc., LL.B., LL.M.

Excellent article by Dr. Byram Bridle who is a vaccinologists (someone who creates vaccines) pointing out the hypocrisy of ‘misinformation experts’. Dr. Bridle is not anti-vaccine but pro safe and effective vaccines. This is something we should all be advocating for. “To the supporters of self-proclaimed ‘misinformation experts’: Stop your blind support. Start thinking critically. Ask why your champions are unable and unwilling to engage the public in open discussions about complex science, especially when it is conveniently taking place in their own backyard. A person can’t legitimately claim to be the fastest runner in the world and then refuse to race others that are laying claim to this title. In sports, the team that doesn’t show up, loses by default. I claim to be speaking the truth about COVID-19 vaccines and I have the science to back it up. Now encourage your champions to join me if they claim to be promoting a truth that differs from the reality that I live in. Remarkably, legacy media, Prof. Caulfield, and others have demonstrated massive emotional triggering and launched hit pieces against this event. I encourage you to explore this emotional triggering via internet searches; the lack of objectivity has been profound. Among many incorrect assertions is that the event was designed to give voice to once side of the debate. This couldn’t be further from the truth. As I already stated, people holding a wide range of opinions were invited. It turns out that many people rejected the invitation to engage with 500 members of the public in-person, and thousands more online. I have noted that a common factor is that those who declined insist on pushing a narrative while wielding largely hearsay evidence. Of concern to me is that Prof. Caulfield has doubled down on his accusations against people speaking at this event, which includes me. A successful academic career is built upon a pristine reputation. So, those who insist on accusing me of misleading the public while constantly wielding, at best, cherry-picked or hearsay evidence, and at worst, mere personal speculation, should not be surprised that I reserve the right to defend my professional reputation.” https://lnkd.in/g7Gy9F8p

Why Do Narrative-Pushing 'Experts' Keep Refusing to Attend Public Discussions?

Why Do Narrative-Pushing 'Experts' Keep Refusing to Attend Public Discussions?

viralimmunologist.substack.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics