CEO John Quarrey’s bold approach to investing in creative talent means we prioritise creativity, passion, and innovation in everything we do. From groundbreaking campaigns to jaw-dropping brand experiences, it's this investment in creative minds that sets us apart. Check out this article on why John is betting big on creativity and how it’s transforming the way we work. 🧠✨ Read more here 👇
Kayleigh Jenkins’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Two heartening things here - even with robust in-house marketing, brands still need outside support for consistent creativity, and big brands are recognizing it's not the size of the agency that matters. Big holding companies will tout giving you a specialized team that works specifically on your account. Exactly what you'll get with a smaller shop - but you'll likely have direct access to more senior and experienced talent and agency leadership. I've been on the client side and the agency side - and it's absolutely true that "Brands still cannot internally replicate agencies’ steady “heartbeat of passionate creativity.”
Small creative agencies are winning major accounts—inside the growing trend
adage.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Struggling with in-house creative thinking? Are you finding subjective opinions are making crucial creative decisions? The Lodgers are you answer - your in-house creative voice with expert advice not clouded by a ‘gut feel’ #thelodgers #creativeminds #creativethinking
“…even businesses in the most routine sectors will need to bring imagination and originality to bear if they are to outcompete rivals” We couldn’t have put it better ourselves, Helen Edwards and Marketing Week. And it times perfectly with the launch of The Lodgers 🪑 The Lodgers are the creative tenants that sit inside any and every business, bringing the “defiance and honesty” that brands need. As this article observes, look at the brilliant creativity that’s come from two brands who have an in-house creative offering: Specsavers and Oatly. Whilst smaller business might not quite have their budgets; that’s where a Lodging creative director steps in. Consistent creative direction, on a flexible, subscription basis. www.thelodgers.co.uk
The C-suite is missing the chief creative officer
https://www.marketingweek.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Anything is possible with imagination and will. The true definition of creativity is the application of creative thinking to real world problems with demonstrable results. And that problem can be anything.
"If you happen to be a CMO, with all the challenges of growth in a complex world laid at your door, you’ll be a braver, clearer, stronger one with a talented chief creative officer by your side". Helen Edwards' latest column for Marketing Week makes the case for the Chief Creative Officer. And if you appoint one, "Be prepared for this to mean not just a tough review of your current sprawling agency arrangements, but a recommendation to redeploy the budgets to bring all creative endeavour in-house. Traditionally, marketers have resisted the ‘agency inside’ approach, partly through the myth that creative types need a mixed diet of challenges if they are not to get stale. What creative people actually want is the chance to do great work. Full stop." https://lnkd.in/gQjuXQGr
The C-suite is missing the chief creative officer
https://www.marketingweek.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Agency PR isn't just about getting brilliant PR for the agency but also about those clever people within it. Being able to find the niches and angles to showcase some very talented individuals in this creative industry is a key skill at Wildstorm. When we started researching, we found that there are many CEOs in advertising who have forgotten about creativity - or at least don't seem to talk about it. We wanted to change that, bringing creativity back to the table and positioning Lucky Generals's Cressida Holmes-Smith as a creative-focussed CEO. The latest output being this piece in The Drum. https://lnkd.in/eM2jeHXv
If we run agencies like bean factories, creativity will remain at an all-time low
thedrum.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Learn about the Chief Creative Officer's role in leading creative strategy, fostering innovation, and driving brand success in today's competitive market. #ChiefCreativeOfficer #CreativityinBusiness #CCOChallenges #SuccessionPlanning #BusinessGrowth https://lnkd.in/esRg8EzS
How a Chief Creative Officer Can Boost Your Bottom Line
https://epicpu.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Great strategy is a creative act and the first line of defence against ordinary. Redefining problems and refining executions is central to the gig and requires a brain to work both logically and laterally. It’s this combination that has always made this role, whatever you call it, rather powerful.
The great Mark Ritson recently wrote a brief but provocative post about hating the title ‘creative strategist’. On behalf of the APG, the home of planners and strategists, this is an invitation for Mark to come and judge the APG’s Creative Strategy Awards 2025. His post posed tough questions for anyone whose job is or includes creative strategy. It received 1000+ likes and a huge amount of agreement. The essence of it was that the title is an oxymoron - that you can’t be both an expert strategist and an expert creative. Mark is rightly a purist when it comes to strategy. To him the title wrongly blurs the lines between two things which should be distinct. APG members are a broad church and whilst most aren’t creative strategists by job title, many will see creative strategy as part of their role, and naturally the APG feels some responsibility to stand up for the value creative strategy has, especially the discipline and the process, perhaps more than the title. Over the years I’ve been an account planner, brand planner, strategist, brand strategist. This job has a proud history going back to when two 70s legends, JWT’s Stephen King and BMP’s Stanley Pollitt, jointly invented account planning. The changing nature of the role, including its recent sub-variant creative strategy, tells a story of the evolution of advertising. All these titles are flawed. And whilst I’m not a creative strategist by title, his post hit a nerve for me for three reasons. First, many people who are planners or strategists like me, wear a ‘creative strategy’ hat part of the time. This part of the job is about working closely with creative people to help make impactful creative work that executes a brand’s marketing communications strategy. Is this strategy? Or creativity? It’s true the label doesn’t fit the proper delineation between strategy and execution. Second, I work closely with some brilliant people called creative strategists at Jellyfish, strategically-minded creative thinkers who are experts in getting the best out of social platforms. I see the value they bring to our clients every day. Third, because of the fantastic non-profit organisation the APG, whose committee I sit on, and whose Creative Strategy Awards I’m hugely proud to have been asked to chair in 2025. We’re not going to try to persuade Mark it’s a perfect job title, but we would like him to see, read and discuss with us the very best of this thing called ‘creative strategy’ being done by people with all sorts of job titles across the world today. All the APG asks is that you consider our invitation, Mark. Final round judging takes two days in London in July '25. We'll put aside any differences on the name, but would love to debate the merits of the work. For a look at the winners from 2023, including the phenomenal Grand Prix winning ‘Raise your arches’ by Leo Burnett London for McDonald’s, visit https://lnkd.in/ef7uTXY9 Sarah Newman Martin Beverley Emily Harlock
APG Creative Strategy Awards Winners
apg.org.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
800,000 impressions prove this: The agency model is failing! I am of course referring to the LinkedIn post that blew up on Stephanie McCarty's watch, way back in March. March nag damit! That's 7 month's ago! The UK changed an entire government in that time – That's a poor analogy 🤦♂️. Let's be real though, she's not wrong. We’ve reached a point where brands know their audiences better than anyone, yet agencies continue to insist on long-winded immersion phases and strategy dives that are not only redundant but also expensive. And don't get me started on revenue models 😡. In fact, do, but that's another post entirely. Meanwhile, what #brands actually need is pure creativity—radical, boundary-pushing ideas that truly resonate with people; human beings. Stephanie's thoughts, perfectly capture the tension—agencies are focused on research and strategy, but what brands truly need is creativity. Bold, brave ideas that connect with people, not endless strategy sessions. We live in a world that’s moving too fast for that. We're moving at the speed of culture and brands today need partners who come in with fresh ideas, not more layers of stuff they've already got. What the industry needs isn’t another agency chasing revenue—it needs true collaborators who are here to disrupt, (overused word), the market, not fit into it. The problem with a lot of agencies is that they’ve lost sight of the one thing they should be focused on, the one thing we're bloody good at– big, bold, audacious ideas that make a f***ing impact. Whats worse, too often, agencies cut their senior creative talent to save on costs—the very people #CMO's are actually looking for. The result? Bland, average, safe work, that checks boxes but doesn’t spark movement. It’s frustrating, and it’s why so many CMOs are leaning into in-house teams. That said, I still believe in agencies. The potential is there. Agencies can thrive if they strip away the excess and go back to their core strength—creativity. No more bloated processes. No more “we need another 6 weeks to immerse ourselves in the brand.” Just big ideas that move the needle. Burn the old playbooks. Let's get back to making magic. What do you think? 🔗 The post that went viral: https://lnkd.in/e8XN6Uda 🔗 The ADWEEK follow up: https://lnkd.in/ePPKYrkZ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A few weeks ago, Robbie Woodward posted, "The agency model is failing!" (Link below), referring to the LinkedIn post "Here's my beef with ad agencies" (Link below) of Stephanie McCarty's back in March. I agree with both of them; the agency model is broken, and the agencies broke it long ago, but they can also fix it. Historically, many agencies gave away creative ideas "for free," bundling the cost into media and production budgets. While this model worked for years, it devalued the creative in clients' minds. Now that production and media are commoditized, agencies face pushback from clients trying to charge for the one thing that truly sets them apart - the creative. As a result, providing strategy has become a new focal point for many agencies trying to build revenue, especially as they see business strategy companies like IBM and Deloitte enter the marketing space by acquiring agencies and integrating them into their strategic services. But, there's a fundamental disconnect when agencies offer business strategy. Clients don't view agencies as business strategy firms in the same way they view firms whose core business is providing strategy. Companies don't naturally turn to an agency for strategic consulting; they have plenty of specialized business consulting firms to choose from, just as they wouldn't hire a business consultant to develop breakthrough creative for an ad campaign. Ironically, while clients still think, "We need an agency" for creative work, the creative idea is still devalued rather than a standalone, premium service. The path forward for agencies lies in reclaiming the true worth of what is at the core of their business and defines them—their creative ideas. To thrive, agencies must work to change the marketplace's perception, and great creative is not free. Changing the market's perception won't happen overnight. The industry can start by taking a few steps like: · Stop burying creative fees in project budgets · Overtime increase what you are charging for your creative · Resist developing creative approaches for clients for free, hoping they will buy one. No other industry does this, IBM and Deloitte don't develop business strategies for clients in hopes they will get paid. You can say the same for architects, even restaurants, they don't bring out five entrees for you to taste and you only pay for the one you like, nuts. · Begin replacing clients who do not want to pay you for your ideas with those who will. Stephanie McCarty's post that went viral: https://lnkd.in/e8XN6Uda Robbie's post.
800,000 impressions prove this: The agency model is failing! I am of course referring to the LinkedIn post that blew up on Stephanie McCarty's watch, way back in March. March nag damit! That's 7 month's ago! The UK changed an entire government in that time – That's a poor analogy 🤦♂️. Let's be real though, she's not wrong. We’ve reached a point where brands know their audiences better than anyone, yet agencies continue to insist on long-winded immersion phases and strategy dives that are not only redundant but also expensive. And don't get me started on revenue models 😡. In fact, do, but that's another post entirely. Meanwhile, what #brands actually need is pure creativity—radical, boundary-pushing ideas that truly resonate with people; human beings. Stephanie's thoughts, perfectly capture the tension—agencies are focused on research and strategy, but what brands truly need is creativity. Bold, brave ideas that connect with people, not endless strategy sessions. We live in a world that’s moving too fast for that. We're moving at the speed of culture and brands today need partners who come in with fresh ideas, not more layers of stuff they've already got. What the industry needs isn’t another agency chasing revenue—it needs true collaborators who are here to disrupt, (overused word), the market, not fit into it. The problem with a lot of agencies is that they’ve lost sight of the one thing they should be focused on, the one thing we're bloody good at– big, bold, audacious ideas that make a f***ing impact. Whats worse, too often, agencies cut their senior creative talent to save on costs—the very people #CMO's are actually looking for. The result? Bland, average, safe work, that checks boxes but doesn’t spark movement. It’s frustrating, and it’s why so many CMOs are leaning into in-house teams. That said, I still believe in agencies. The potential is there. Agencies can thrive if they strip away the excess and go back to their core strength—creativity. No more bloated processes. No more “we need another 6 weeks to immerse ourselves in the brand.” Just big ideas that move the needle. Burn the old playbooks. Let's get back to making magic. What do you think? 🔗 The post that went viral: https://lnkd.in/e8XN6Uda 🔗 The ADWEEK follow up: https://lnkd.in/ePPKYrkZ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Collaboration isn't just a strategy; it's a philosophy we embrace at Hollywood Branded. By working together with industry competitors, we unlock a world of possibilities for our clients and the marketing landscape. Learn about the transformative power of collaboration in the team's latest article. #Marketing #AgencyLife #HollywoodBranded https://lnkd.in/gqsyxDXe
Why Collaboration is King: Turning Competitors into Creative Partners
blog.hollywoodbranded.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Some news from me: February 21st was my last day as Chief Strategy Officer at Diva. Announcement follows: "Nearly two years after launching the strategy department at Diva, redesigning the internal approach to creative briefs, reinvigorating the pitching process, diagnosing, defining and designing a refreshed agency approach to brand strategy, and leading the team into Tough Mudder - now is the time to move on and find something different. I will be forever grateful to the tenacity and commitment the team at Diva showed at embedding strategy into our work. Together we won new clients with YouTube, Ubisoft and the BBC - as well as working with existing clients (there’s one more project that’s finished and unannounced that I can’t wait to tell you about too). One of the great things about being a planner in this business is that whenever you leave an agency, you almost certainly leave it with work in the oven and knowing what’s arriving out of Diva later this year, I can’t wait to share it with you. One of my favourite David Ogilvy-isms is this: “If each of us hires people who are smaller than we are, we shall become a company of dwarfs. But if each of us hires people who are bigger than we are, we shall become a company of giants.” The team I worked at Diva were exactly that, giants. The talent in the studio is incredible. And the client services, project, and strategy team around them to brief and deliver the work will always set the template to me for what great work looks like." I will miss them terribly. Nevertheless, it is time for me to look to the horizon and see what’s next. Spring is around the corner and 2024 is barely getting going. Anyone that regularly reads Five things on Friday might have a good idea about where my head might be leaning. Exploring themes of leadership, integrated strategy & planning, branded entertainment and gaming - well, it takes you to interesting places, right? I’m going to tug on that thread and see where it takes me. In the short term, I intend to take time to reflect on the journey so far, spend some time with the family, and of course, play some video games. If you know anyone looking for my kind of brain (or if you would like to work with me on anything specific), please feel free to drop me a message - either here or direct by email: whatleydude at gmail dot com. I'd love to hear from you x
To view or add a comment, sign in