Over this past weekend, Twitter discovered the problem that Kevin O'Connell and I have dedicated the past four years of our lives to solving. Why don't lawyers and other non-coders have a git-like version control system? I share my thoughts in this essay https://lnkd.in/eqnFu29F. This is an important question. The legal system is the essential bedrock upon which all else in society is built. The protection of civil rights, peaceful conflict resolution, access to due process, enforceable contracts — all these depend on a well functioning legal system. The professionals who operate this system are not currently equipped with tooling that meets their needs.
Wow. Your essay explains this issue beautifully. As a future trainee I had no idea of the issue, but I’m hopeful the future generation of solicitors will embrace this technology. Where can I learn more about it? Jordan Bryan
Great article, Jordan. Really great way of capturing the value/insight of what you've built.
Excellent read. Still flexing those marketing chops all these years later. Rooting for you guys!
Because Google/Microsoft/Whatever Docs have versioning bult-in & nobody needs a pull request on a dev branch with CI/CD pipelines for a simple contract.
This exists both for legal and non legal documents, and has existed for decades. Go talk to some lawyers about their contract management and redlining tools. Talk to a knowledge management or document management expert about CMS and all the general and industry-specific doc management tools. Heck, if you have a sales team, talk about CPQ. Get out of the bubble. What made git revolutionary is that it was free. Make those tools free and you've got something. Of course, what you'd have is not a business, but it would be something.
Lawyers do love their paper. I did some consulting work several years back on a system to completely automate the production, versioning and signing of common low-level agreements (NDAs, Employment Agreements, etc.) The stakeholers were all corporate contract attorneys ranging in age from 20s to 50s who directly steered the requirements. Many of the things they asked for seemed really strange to me, until I asked if I could shadow a few of them for a week. Turns out, not a single one of them was using the system. They all had an assistant that would print out all the contracts with numbered lines, big margins and double spaces, and they would mark them up by hand. Then their assistant would take the changes and dump them all back into the system. Rinse. Repeat. It’s hard to innovate in an industry that just doesn’t operate with technology in the way you would expect.
If it is one thing I learned, it's that command line scares the average person.
Specialist in legal tech and knowledge management
1moPosting this here for anyone thinking M365 et al versioning is sufficient https://jackwshepherd.medium.com/is-document-collaboration-in-law-firms-just-too-old-school-3371c024ddbf