Learn from exceptional outcomes in ordinary contexts, not extraordinary outcomes in anomalous contexts.
The mundane is often where the most significant lessons are found. A simple product or an ordinary team solving a problem can be highly instructive. Do you think it's simple Survivorship Bias that causes people to be drawn to chasing "extraordinary outcomes in anomalous contexts"?
Speaks to the criteria for accurate comps and actually relevant reference models.
People-Centric Leadership | Product Strategy | Executive Coach | ICE-EC | I help companies unlock greatness by unlocking the boundless potential of its people
18hCouldn’t both be instructive? I get the preference for ordinary contexts.