John Heilbronn’s Post

Lots of interesting perspectives in this discussion. A few that stood out to me: Huang doesn't believe in 1 on 1s for his direct staff of 60. His thought is the focus should be on transparency. If someone makes a mistake, everyone should learn from it. Everyone should know what the goals and challenges are all at once. But he also said this does not "scale down" because junior people still need supervision. 60 directs is a lot of people, but it also eliminates 7 layers of management in his view. Conceptually this sounds the same as Ray Dalio's transparency approach at Bridgewater Associates. His rejection of 1 on 1s for his staff suggests a very high level of trust within his executive ranks. That must have developed over time and according to his management style. As he puts it: "You can achieve operational excellence through process, but craft can only be achieved with tenure". Extraordinary things require craft. Other insights: Attends meetings all day but not regular meetings. E-staff are pinch hitters. Problems, idea, brainstorming or creation meetings only. "0-billion dollar markets." If you try to do something very difficult and create something that has never been done before, the effort provides huge opportunities. More fun to create then take share. Also, no one will notice your failures if you are the only one doing something new. If you are not using AI, you will be replaced by someone who is or by a company that is using it. (It might sound like he's talking his own book, but I find AI to provide significant productivity boosts. I agree with his assessment.) Huang talks about the need for an aesthetic in high quality work. Collison agrees. Other examples of people I can think of who said this are Steve Jobs and Jim Simons. I think it is more than coincidence when extremely accomplished individuals have similar principles.

A conversation with NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang

https://www.youtube.com/

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics