The Victorian Trades Hall Council is currently surveying Health and Safety Representatives (HSR's) ahead of the announcement of the appointment of an 'independent' reviewer to undertake a review of Part 8 of the OHS Act (ARREO) and the powers of HSR's. HSR's are a reflection of union representation in Victoria and can be found in mostly unionsied workplaces (less than ten percent). In small businesses, and in non-unionised industries, HSR's are few and far between. The Trades Hall survey is unsurprisingly loaded. The review will undoubtedly result in increased union power through both ARREO and HSR's. A 'holy grail' wishlist item for the unions in Victoria, which will also likely form part of the review, is for the OHS Act to provide duties for managers and supervisors. This is an issue that the unions and WorkSafe Victoria have raised repeatedly over the last two decades. The review will most likely seek to rubberstamp this change to the Act, delivering the unions what they want. The OHS Act and Regulations that provide for OHS Issue Resolution provide that where an employer has an Issue Resolution Procedure, and nominates a management representative for the purpose of that procedure, that the person nominated must have sufficient seniority and also be competent (i.e. by WorkSafe's definition at least same training as a HSR - 5 days training). The unions want every person that is in a managerial or supervisory capacity to have specific legal duties and for there to be mandatory requirements for training for all of these persons. The unions argue that every manager and supervisor should be as knowledgable as the HSR. The creation of OHS duties for managers and supervisors would be wielded as a weapon by the unions, used to intimidate managers and supervisors to drive their industrial agendas with the threat of workplace manslaughter or criminal charges that would apply to them as individuals. The primary employer duty under the Act already provides the responsibility on their employer to provide adequate supervision. There is no legislative gap. The introduction of mandatory training for all managers and supervisors would cost Victorian employers hundred of millions of dollars. When this issue was first raised by WorkSafe years ago, when I was first at VACC, the Head of their IR Team, Kevin Redfern gave me some outstanding advice - "Never do anything that your members will not thank you for!" Will industry bodies sell their members out in the hope of generating millions of training revenue from mandatory training or will they get together with the other Associations that are members of the Victorian Congress of Employer Associations (VCEA) to fight this before it becomes a recommendation for change of the Act? When the review is announced make sure that your Association acts in your best interests, not theirs.
John Darcy’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
How courts in Queensland and New South Wales have recently considered the application of the duty of officers under legislation which is comparable NZ's Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA). With the similarity between our HSWA and the Australian legislation the decisions should be interest to those who hold positions of 'officers' here in NZ.
Lessons for New Zealand officers from Australian health and safety prosecutions
lexology.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The September edition of Professional Security Magazine will feature 'Labour so far'. Something I forgot to include was any comparison with the 1974 Labour government's passing of the Health and Safety at Work Act. Of relevance because Martyn's Law could well be security management's equivalent of health and safety. The law, while necessary, is only the beginning. The TUC in its review significantly stresses how the enforcement of the law by a regulator is so important: and the HSE has been hollowed out for a while. https://lnkd.in/gDbpiRZx
50 years of the Health and Safety At Work Act
tuc.org.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
2024 marks the 50th anniversary of the introduction of the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA 1974), which remains the umbrella legislation that underpins all legal health & safety requirements for both employers and employees in the UK. The team and I are currently reviewing any changes to legislation that might apply to us and to our industry allowing us to make any necessary changes to our plans, policies or procedures. #thameswater #lanesgroup #healthandsafety #legislation #iosh
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Did you know that on the 29th July 2024, important changes to the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 and the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 came into effect? The Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (WHSOLA Act) implements legislative change from the 2022 Review of the Queensland’s Work Health and Safety Act 2011 and the national 2018 Review of the model work health and safety laws. Key changes include: - Clarifying HSR powers - Encouraging the election of HSRs - Provisions to ensure HSRs are appropriately remunerated - Streamlining the issue and dispute resolution process - Promoting consultation between workers, representatives and person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) - Clarifying and extending entry permit holders (EPH) powers. More information can be found on the Work Safe website: www.worksafe.qld.gov.au If you need help navigating these changes, don't hesitate to reach out to us! #whs #industryspecialists #heretohelp #worksafeqld
Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024
worksafe.qld.gov.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The main piece of legislation covering health and safety in the UK is the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, also known as HSWA or the 1974 Act. This act outlines the general duties of: Employers towards their employees and the public Employees towards themselves and others The self-employed towards themselves and others The HSWA is supplemented by other regulations and guidance documents to provide more specific information on how to comply with health and safety law. Some important supplementary regulations include: The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Working Time Regulations 1998
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Codes of Practice under the WHS Act For: Employers and managers Information seekers. A Code of Practice is a practical guide, approved under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. About the Codes of Practice Each Code covers an issue or situation and: offers ways to identify and manage risks sets out how to achieve the standards required under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 and Work Health and Safety Regulations 2011. An approved Code of Practice is admissible in court proceedings. Courts may: regard an approved Code as evidence of what is known about a hazard, a risk, a risk assessment or control rely on a Code to determine what is reasonably practicable in the circumstances.
Codes of Practice under the WHS Act
comcare.gov.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🎓 This is a CPD article with reflective questions. The QNMU welcomes amendments to the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) that build upon Queensland’s nation-leading work health and safety (WHS) framework and strengthen health and safety for Queenslanders where they work. The Bill gives effect to substantial legislative recommendations made by the independent 2022 review of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (WHS Final Report), as well as a number of recommendations from the 2018 National Review of the model work health and safety laws (the Boland Review). The QNMU, alongside other unions and workers, have long advocated for many of these changes to ensure workers are protected by robust and contemporary work health and safety laws, that put workers safety first. 🔗 Read more: https://bit.ly/3zkNtSs
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Absolute power corrupts absolutely... spoon fed power corrupts even more! Taking absolutely nothing away from the brilliance of Nick McKenzie, Ben Schneiders and David Marin-Guzman in their expose on the infiltration of bikies and underworld figures into the industry the most interesting outcome is the number of times the expression "everyone already knew" or words to that effect were been uttered since. What they don't know, without questioning their brilliance as journalists, is the detail of IR/OHS law and the role that these laws play in embedding the bikies and criminals into the industry. But what did everyone know? Well, probably a hell of a lot more than I am talking to in this post, but here are some things that that industry definitely knows. - Occupational Health and Safety laws (and equivalent WHS) have been the key ingredient that the CFMEU has used to inflitrate the industry. - They have done so with the support of complicit Labor Government's that have enabled the misuse of OHS right of entry powers and powers of (un)elected Health and Safety Representatives to facilitate wide spread industrial relations chaos not only on their Government/Tax payer funded projects, but across the entire industry. - CFMEU appointed delegates on construction sites (let's be clear that they are not elected) automatically assume the position of Health and Safety Representative (let's be clear they are not properly elected as per the OHS Act) and immediately take on and abuse (i.e. unlawfully apply) a power of stopping work on a whim to drive their industrial and/or criminal agendas. - OHS Regulators (i.e State Governments) know fully well the difference between elected HSR's, as per the Act, and also of the CFMEU's appointment of thugs/bikies as HSR's. - Abuse of health and safety was a feature of the 2002 Cole Royal Commission. A completely seperate section of the final report was deliberately carved out to deal with health and safety. It use as an industrial relations weapon has never changed. And just think that in just a few days time (i.e. 29 July 2024) HSR's in Queensland will have an arbitrary power that has been gifted to them by the QLD Guvament which will enable them to be able to stop work whenever they want to. And the Victorian Government is already contemplating amending the OHS Act to increase the powers of HSR's and union officials to misuse and abuse their powers to an even greater extent. This is not just about corrupt unions, it is about the corrupt Governments that have actually facilitated the CFMEU's takeover of the industry. Sometimes the detail behind a story can be buried much deeper than the story itself! Now where is my Walkley Award!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Workplace Health and Safety is critical and with Comcares updated HSR handbook, its even more important that you're across the rights of a HSR.
The Comcare Health and Safety Representative (HSR) Handbook has been revised to reflect recent amendments to Commonwealth work health and safety (WHS) laws and updates to the Safe Work Australia Worker Representation and Participation Guide. Comcare’s handbook helps HSRs understand how to perform their functions and exercise their powers under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The handbook is also a useful resource for others who need to understand HSR powers and functions, and any obligations they may have regarding HSRs. Read the HSR Handbook: https://lnkd.in/gbTGHkHX
HSR Handbook
comcare.gov.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The sad truth is, the responsible appointments in terms of the Occupational Health and Safety act, does not always understand the risks they have in their own capacity and in the appointed roles. They rarely understand the personal liability they can hold when workplace safety protocols are not followed. 16.1, 16.2 and GMR2.1 appointees NEED to understand these amendmends. Short cuts with Safety is not worth loosing everything you worked for. Safety proffesionals should place a big focus on educating appointed roles on their responsibilities, not just hand them a one pager appointment and assume they understand the extend of it.
FURTHER PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE OHS AMENDMENT BILL, 2020 Following on from my posts these last couple of weeks dealing with the changes, see below a short summary of further proposed measures: - Section 24 adds a subsection (5), which requires Employers to submit annual incident statistics to the Department on the 1st of March each year. This submission must also include incident statistics for all Contractors; - The insertion of section 37B, which expressly states that an Employer, CEO or a Manager commits an offence if their failure to comply with the Act results in the death, permanent disablement or illness of a person; - The introduction of section 37F which lists specific "offences" for which a person may be held liable. An example in 37F(g) is the failure to use safety equipment at a workplace; - The introduction of Schedule 1 and 2 for the imposition of fines (see attached picture of Schedule 1 fines which are linked to the specific sections in the Act). Failure to appoint SHE Rep(s), if required, may lead to a fine of R1 million; - In terms of the new section 43(4) a fine of up to R5 million may in future be imposed for the contravention of the Regulations to the OHS Act. Please take note that this is not the final version of the Amendment Bill and additional changes may still be made before eventual promulgation. #compliance #healthandsafety
To view or add a comment, sign in
Director at Automotive Assesments
6moThanks John, I think it still stands true today.