John Darcy’s Post

View profile for John Darcy, graphic

One of the most trusted and experienced OHS and Workers Compensation practitioners in the country.

The Victorian Trades Hall Council is currently surveying Health and Safety Representatives (HSR's) ahead of the announcement of the appointment of an 'independent' reviewer to undertake a review of Part 8 of the OHS Act (ARREO) and the powers of HSR's. HSR's are a reflection of union representation in Victoria and can be found in mostly unionsied workplaces (less than ten percent). In small businesses, and in non-unionised industries, HSR's are few and far between. The Trades Hall survey is unsurprisingly loaded. The review will undoubtedly result in increased union power through both ARREO and HSR's. A 'holy grail' wishlist item for the unions in Victoria, which will also likely form part of the review, is for the OHS Act to provide duties for managers and supervisors. This is an issue that the unions and WorkSafe Victoria have raised repeatedly over the last two decades. The review will most likely seek to rubberstamp this change to the Act, delivering the unions what they want. The OHS Act and Regulations that provide for OHS Issue Resolution provide that where an employer has an Issue Resolution Procedure, and nominates a management representative for the purpose of that procedure, that the person nominated must have sufficient seniority and also be competent (i.e. by WorkSafe's definition at least same training as a HSR - 5 days training). The unions want every person that is in a managerial or supervisory capacity to have specific legal duties and for there to be mandatory requirements for training for all of these persons. The unions argue that every manager and supervisor should be as knowledgable as the HSR. The creation of OHS duties for managers and supervisors would be wielded as a weapon by the unions, used to intimidate managers and supervisors to drive their industrial agendas with the threat of workplace manslaughter or criminal charges that would apply to them as individuals. The primary employer duty under the Act already provides the responsibility on their employer to provide adequate supervision. There is no legislative gap. The introduction of mandatory training for all managers and supervisors would cost Victorian employers hundred of millions of dollars. When this issue was first raised by WorkSafe years ago, when I was first at VACC, the Head of their IR Team, Kevin Redfern gave me some outstanding advice - "Never do anything that your members will not thank you for!" Will industry bodies sell their members out in the hope of generating millions of training revenue from mandatory training or will they get together with the other Associations that are members of the Victorian Congress of Employer Associations (VCEA) to fight this before it becomes a recommendation for change of the Act? When the review is announced make sure that your Association acts in your best interests, not theirs.

HSR Survey

HSR Survey

https://typeform.com

Kevin Redfern

Director at Automotive Assesments

6mo

Thanks John, I think it still stands true today.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics