The California Supreme Court has upheld Proposition 22 as constitutional, meaning that app-based drivers (who meet certain conditions) will remain classified as independent contractors rather than employees. My Perkins Coie colleagues discuss the implications of the ruling in this blog post. #LaborLaw #Prop22 #CaliforniaLaborLaw #WageAndHour
Jim Brenner’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
The California Supreme Court has upheld Proposition 22 as constitutional, meaning that app-based drivers (who meet certain conditions) will remain classified as independent contractors rather than employees. My Perkins Coie colleagues discuss the implications of the ruling in this blog post. #LaborLaw #Prop22 #CaliforniaLaborLaw #WageAndHour
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 | Wage & Hour Developments
https://www.wageandhourdevelopment.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The California Supreme Court has upheld Proposition 22 as constitutional, meaning that app-based drivers (who meet certain conditions) will remain classified as independent contractors rather than employees. My Perkins Coie colleagues discuss the implications of the ruling in this blog post. #LaborLaw #Prop22 #CaliforniaLaborLaw #WageAndHour
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 | Wage & Hour Developments
https://www.wageandhourdevelopment.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The California Supreme Court has upheld Proposition 22 as constitutional, meaning that app-based drivers (who meet certain conditions) will remain classified as independent contractors rather than employees. My Perkins Coie colleagues discuss the implications of the ruling in this blog post. #LaborLaw #Prop22 #CaliforniaLaborLaw #WageAndHour
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 | Wage & Hour Developments
https://www.wageandhourdevelopment.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The California Supreme Court has upheld Proposition 22 as constitutional, meaning that app-based drivers (who meet certain conditions) will remain classified as independent contractors rather than employees. My Perkins Coie colleagues discuss the implications of the ruling in this blog post. #LaborLaw #Prop22 #CaliforniaLaborLaw #WageAndHour
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 | Wage & Hour Developments
https://www.wageandhourdevelopment.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Kentucky General Assembly recently approved a new law reducing the time for employees to bring certain claims against employers under state law including claims under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act and the Kentucky Wage and Hour law. The new shortened statute of limitations goes into effect on July 15, 2024. To find out more about this change, check out the article below: https://lnkd.in/ei5mYwnG
Time’s Up: New Kentucky Law Reduces Time Employees Have to Bring Discrimination and Wage Lawsuits
fisherphillips.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The California Supreme Court has issued a ruling to address whether a party can intervene in another party's ongoing Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action that asserts overlapping claims. This Perkins Coie blog post delves into the implications for both employers and employees. #LaborAndEmployment #EmploymentLaw #IndependentContractors
Ride-Hail Drivers Lack Standing Under California's PAGA to Intervene in Overlapping PAGA Case | Wage & Hour
https://www.wageandhourdevelopment.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The California Supreme Court has issued a ruling to address whether a party can intervene in another party's ongoing Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action that asserts overlapping claims. This Perkins Coie blog post delves into the implications for both employers and employees. #LaborAndEmployment #EmploymentLaw #IndependentContractors
Ride-Hail Drivers Lack Standing Under California's PAGA to Intervene in Overlapping PAGA Case | Wage & Hour
https://www.wageandhourdevelopment.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This Perkins Coie blog post reviews a Massachusetts appellate court's decision on retention bonuses. Learn why these bonuses are not considered wages and what this means for both employers and employees. #LaborAndEmployment #LaborLaw #WageAndHour #RetentionBonuses
Massachusetts Court Finds Retention Bonuses Are Not Wages | Wage & Hour Developments
perkinscoie.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This Perkins Coie blog post reviews a Massachusetts appellate court's decision on retention bonuses. Learn why these bonuses are not considered wages and what this means for both employers and employees. #LaborAndEmployment #LaborLaw #WageAndHour #RetentionBonuses
Massachusetts Court Finds Retention Bonuses Are Not Wages | Wage & Hour Developments
perkinscoie.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This Perkins Coie blog post reviews a Massachusetts appellate court's decision on retention bonuses. Learn why these bonuses are not considered wages and what this means for both employers and employees. #LaborAndEmployment #LaborLaw #WageAndHour #RetentionBonuses
Massachusetts Court Finds Retention Bonuses Are Not Wages | Wage & Hour Developments
perkinscoie.com
To view or add a comment, sign in