Many companies operate under the assumption that internal competition between teams drives innovation and performance. In Productivity Reimagined, I shared stories of companies that did exactly the opposite – worked hard to develop an environment of mutual trust in which people are intrinsically motivated to share their innovative ideas. A recent study, reported in the September 15 issue of the Wall Street Journal, corroborated this. “Research suggests that when employees compete, they become less innovative, because they don’t want to share ideas with their rivals,” says the subheading in the article. https://lnkd.in/gDSHCUV9 In a supportive team environments, there are no rivals. One week to go until the launch of Productivity Reimagined! https://lnkd.in/gYnq_8Ps
Jacob Stoller’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Innovation is a cooperative endeavour
Many organizations encourage competition between internal teams, believing it will spark #innovation and drive performance. The trouble is, what actually happens is the opposite. In a recent study of companies that pushed internal teams to compete with each other, the teams did end up working harder when they were battling each other. But the more teams competed, the less innovative they were. They were wary of sharing information with other teams, so they weren’t getting unexpected, inspiring ideas from people in other parts of the company. In fact, the only teams that excelled in the study were ones that did choose to share information with others, whether out of necessity or strategically. What do you think are the pros and cons of pitting work teams against each other? 🔗 Learn how your company can leverage the benefits of competition without sacrificing information sharing between teams: https://lnkd.in/eZHWG_7B
Companies Like to Pit Internal Teams Against Each Other. Bad Idea.
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
When healthy tension becomes tribalism. There is something about pitting two teams against each other that seems counterintuitive. At a time when people have difficulty with civil discourse, forcing confrontation is asking for trouble. Not to mention this closely resembles #3 of the “Ten Rules for Stifling Innovation”: “Ask departments or individuals to challenge and criticize each other's proposals. (That saves you the job of deciding; you just pick the survivor.)”. Ask me for a copy. As the article points out, sharing ideas to better understand the opportunities is the preferred way for creating creativity. (See my post on Creating Creativity: https://lnkd.in/eyuSt8YZ) If teams are formed and led properly, there is no need for other teams to challenge them for effect. There are healthy tensions that can exist, but it takes a seasoned leader to know them, let alone spark them. Here are two HBR articles about tension: https://lnkd.in/eRqDPJE https://lnkd.in/g_s4WMG9 Leadership must be intentional. Knowing the types of tension your teams will experience is the first step in developing an effective team. Allowing the wrong kind of tension to flourish can derail months, if not years of progress. #leadership #teams #development https://lnkd.in/eyD-35ax
Many organizations encourage competition between internal teams, believing it will spark #innovation and drive performance. The trouble is, what actually happens is the opposite. In a recent study of companies that pushed internal teams to compete with each other, the teams did end up working harder when they were battling each other. But the more teams competed, the less innovative they were. They were wary of sharing information with other teams, so they weren’t getting unexpected, inspiring ideas from people in other parts of the company. In fact, the only teams that excelled in the study were ones that did choose to share information with others, whether out of necessity or strategically. What do you think are the pros and cons of pitting work teams against each other? 🔗 Learn how your company can leverage the benefits of competition without sacrificing information sharing between teams: https://lnkd.in/eZHWG_7B
Companies Like to Pit Internal Teams Against Each Other. Bad Idea.
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Insightful. Competition is a strategy that needs thoughtful application. Yes, we drive to be better, evolve, grow, succeed. An organization also shares in its aggregation of positives and negatives, that reminder that a company's employees are all invested in and connected to their colleagues. Without defined purpose and limit, the "Me versus Them" mentality becomes one of the most damaging strategies we could use.
Many organizations encourage competition between internal teams, believing it will spark #innovation and drive performance. The trouble is, what actually happens is the opposite. In a recent study of companies that pushed internal teams to compete with each other, the teams did end up working harder when they were battling each other. But the more teams competed, the less innovative they were. They were wary of sharing information with other teams, so they weren’t getting unexpected, inspiring ideas from people in other parts of the company. In fact, the only teams that excelled in the study were ones that did choose to share information with others, whether out of necessity or strategically. What do you think are the pros and cons of pitting work teams against each other? 🔗 Learn how your company can leverage the benefits of competition without sacrificing information sharing between teams: https://lnkd.in/eZHWG_7B
Companies Like to Pit Internal Teams Against Each Other. Bad Idea.
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I came across this discussion about using surveillance tools to monitor employees’ every move, and I have to say - this is a step in the wrong direction. Instead of micromanaging through surveillance, managers should focus on empowering their teams to succeed. Trust and autonomy foster creativity, productivity, and job satisfaction, while a culture of surveillance breeds fear and disengagement. Leaders should invest in their people by providing the resources, training, and support needed to thrive. Set clear expectations, offer guidance, and then step back. When team members feel trusted and empowered, they perform at their best. True leadership isn't about controlling every detail; it’s about inspiring your team to reach their full potential. Let’s shift the focus from monitoring to mentoring. You hire adults to do adult jobs. Treat them as such. Your people are your greatest asset - empower them to shine. #Leadership #TeamEmpowerment #TrustYourTeam #ManagementTips #LeadersEatLast #InfiniteMindset
Many organizations encourage competition between internal teams, believing it will spark #innovation and drive performance. The trouble is, what actually happens is the opposite. In a recent study of companies that pushed internal teams to compete with each other, the teams did end up working harder when they were battling each other. But the more teams competed, the less innovative they were. They were wary of sharing information with other teams, so they weren’t getting unexpected, inspiring ideas from people in other parts of the company. In fact, the only teams that excelled in the study were ones that did choose to share information with others, whether out of necessity or strategically. What do you think are the pros and cons of pitting work teams against each other? 🔗 Learn how your company can leverage the benefits of competition without sacrificing information sharing between teams: https://lnkd.in/eZHWG_7B
Companies Like to Pit Internal Teams Against Each Other. Bad Idea.
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Some friendly competition can be ok. When it goes beyond that I agree it’s counter productive and often encourages negative behavior. Leadership that builds trust & encourage collaboration across teams raise everyone to a higher level.
Many organizations encourage competition between internal teams, believing it will spark #innovation and drive performance. The trouble is, what actually happens is the opposite. In a recent study of companies that pushed internal teams to compete with each other, the teams did end up working harder when they were battling each other. But the more teams competed, the less innovative they were. They were wary of sharing information with other teams, so they weren’t getting unexpected, inspiring ideas from people in other parts of the company. In fact, the only teams that excelled in the study were ones that did choose to share information with others, whether out of necessity or strategically. What do you think are the pros and cons of pitting work teams against each other? 🔗 Learn how your company can leverage the benefits of competition without sacrificing information sharing between teams: https://lnkd.in/eZHWG_7B
Companies Like to Pit Internal Teams Against Each Other. Bad Idea.
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Creating the right culture to enable innovation can be tricky. Not surprisingly, companies where teams share information openly are more innovative and work for the greater good rather than promoting their own interests. Want to innovate? Support a culture of teaming, knowledge sharing and collegiality. Black box environments where teams work in isolation and keep their ideas secret for the "BIG REVEAL" are counter-productive. Keep everyone focused on the BIG Goals.
Companies Like to Pit Internal Teams Against Each Other. Bad Idea.
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Great things in business are never done by one person; they’re done by a team of people." – Steve Jobs This quote by Steve Jobs emphasizes the importance of teamwork and collaboration in achieving significant accomplishments in the business world. It highlights that no matter how talented or capable an individual may be, the most remarkable and impactful successes are the result of collective effort. Each team member brings unique skills, perspectives, and ideas, which, when combined, create innovative solutions and drive the organization towards its goals. This underscores the value of fostering a collaborative work environment where everyone's contributions are recognized and leveraged to achieve extraordinary outcomes. Check out : https://amtechiot.com/ and Our #CMMS : https://nexcilo.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Title: Unlocking Innovation: Embracing Creativity in the Workplace In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, innovation is key to staying ahead of the curve. But how can organizations foster a culture of creativity and innovation within their teams? 🚀 Here are three strategies to unlock innovation: 1. Cultivate a Diverse Team: Embrace diversity in all its forms - backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. A diverse team brings a variety of ideas to the table, sparking creativity and driving innovation. 2. Encourage Risk-Taking: Create a safe space for experimentation and risk-taking. Encourage employees to think outside the box, challenge the status quo, and pursue unconventional ideas. 3. Foster Collaboration: Break down silos and promote cross-functional collaboration. When employees from different departments come together, they bring unique insights and expertise, leading to innovative solutions. By embracing creativity and empowering employees to think differently, organizations can unlock the full potential of their teams and drive meaningful innovation. 💡 #Innovation #Creativity #workplaceculture
To view or add a comment, sign in
People. Work. Customer.
2moI wholeheartedly agree, though I believe a company's active pitting is only part of the problem. Preventing natural competition that damages the whole can be much more difficult. Leadership really needs to learn about how to create conditions where natural tendencies to compete result in innovation for value to the customer. This is really tough work. It begins with learning, and your new book Productivity Reimagined is a good place to start. If anyone asked me for further recommendations, I would direct them to understanding chaos theory....very interesting and very important for leaders at the highest levels to understand.