How difficult is the security configuration for companies that are implementing D365 F&O?
My impression is that many organisations struggle with security roles in their D365 F&O implementation. One could argue that the complexity of security in D365 F&O has grown so much to become its own process stream. Yet I see a lot of companies settling for a “good enough” approach, with loose access and poorly designed roles. This causes a bunch of issues after go-live (and sometimes even already during the implementation itself). Examples are: 1. Managing roles becomes convoluted and time-consuming 2. Users are dissatisfied by insufficient or excessive access 3. Auditors complain vocally about lack of traceability Is it just my impression? What do you think?
This content isn’t available here
Access this content and more in the LinkedIn app
