Why Arab World doesn't execute its fuel blocking experience after about one year slaughtering of Palestinians?
During the major Arab-Israeli conflicts in the 20th century, such as the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1973 Yom Kippur War, several Arab nations enacted oil embargoes and fuel blockades as a strategic weapon against Israel and its allies.
The most significant example was the 1973 oil crisis, where the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) led by Saudi Arabia imposed an embargo on oil exports to the United States, Canada, Japan, and several Western European countries. This was done in response to the West's support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
The goals of these Arab oil and fuel blockades were multifaceted:
Economic pressure - The aim was to inflict economic damage on Israel and its allies by restricting their access to critical energy supplies.
Political leverage - The fuel blockades were intended to compel Western governments to reconsider their pro-Israel foreign policies.
Disruption of military operations - Restricting fuel availability was seen as a way to undermine Israel's military capabilities and war efforts.
The Arab oil embargo of 1973 in particular had a major global impact, leading to an energy crisis, skyrocketing oil prices, and economic recession in many countries. This demonstrated the substantial geopolitical leverage the Arab states could wield through controlling vital energy resources.
However, the long-term effectiveness of these fuel blockades as a strategic weapon was limited. Israel was eventually able to find alternative sources of fuel, and the global backlash against the embargoes also damaged the Arab states' international standing and relationships.
Overall, the experience highlighted the importance of energy security and the potential for oil and fuel to be used as political and economic weapons, especially in protracted regional conflicts like the Arab-Israeli dispute.
Why Arab World doesn't execute its fuel blocking experience after about one year slaughtering of Palestinians?
During the major Arab-Israeli conflicts in the 20th century, such as the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1973 Yom Kippur War, several Arab nations enacted oil embargoes and fuel blockades as a strategic weapon against Israel and its allies.
The most significant example was the 1973 oil crisis, where the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) led by Saudi Arabia imposed an embargo on oil exports to the United States, Canada, Japan, and several Western European countries. This was done in response to the West's support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
The goals of these Arab oil and fuel blockades were multifaceted:
Economic pressure - The aim was to inflict economic damage on Israel and its allies by restricting their access to critical energy supplies.
Political leverage - The fuel blockades were intended to compel Western governments to reconsider their pro-Israel foreign policies.
Disruption of military operations - Restricting fuel availability was seen as a way to undermine Israel's military capabilities and war efforts.
The Arab oil embargo of 1973 in particular had a major global impact, leading to an energy crisis, skyrocketing oil prices, and economic recession in many countries. This demonstrated the substantial geopolitical leverage the Arab states could wield through controlling vital energy resources.
However, the long-term effectiveness of these fuel blockades as a strategic weapon was limited. Israel was eventually able to find alternative sources of fuel, and the global backlash against the embargoes also damaged the Arab states' international standing and relationships
Meanwhile children continue to be slaughtered daily in G/a/z/a and elsewhere by generous funding of the american taxpayers and full support by the military and intel support of UN security council members of U.S. and U.K. and executed - with sort of evil joy - by the Z/ino/ist regime.
Then it presents a human dilemma really, is the regular western citizen in these states that support this complencnet with this, and if not, can they form a majority to stop this, if there is democracy?
if they can not form a majority or there is no real democratic process in these countries?
What is the alternative, empty solidarity?
or is then all are equaly resposible for crimes that continue to happen everyday, the doers, the funders and the watchers.
This goes equally to Arab and Muslim states, as lack of democracy is not an excuse. It is rather modern fantasy and it has not stopped leaders nor mass populations to take human action before.
Or maybe for us who lived through decades of hell (not as concentrated as it is there now, but still women, children and innocent people were slaughtered) we feel that we paid for our sins and do not deserve to suffer again!
Or if we take action (e.g., Lebanon) then we might increase the suffering since we can not match the level of destruction of those western states! another excuse?
Meanwhile children continue to be slaughtered daily and we are all guilty to one degree or another.
Please read the information below and let us know if you would like to receive help:
Frequently Asked Question: What charity or cause is most likely to get your backing and resources?" ANSWER: Those who follow Easy Guidelines.
Helpful Tip: Never give a Donation link to a Foundation. Foundations have guidelines for funding. For example: JAZZforPEACE firmly believes that the best decision our world could possibly make would be to go from 0% funding for peace to 1%, bringing funding for war down from 100% to 99%. So far we have never met a single person who disagrees. To achieve our goal, we need to fund outstanding causes like you. Follow our easy guidelines at https://lnkd.in/e5jwmcT4 which start by submitting your comment to [email protected] Give us your commitment to follow guidelines, not your donation link.
Why Arab World doesn't execute its fuel blocking experience after about one year slaughtering of Palestinians?
During the major Arab-Israeli conflicts in the 20th century, such as the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1973 Yom Kippur War, several Arab nations enacted oil embargoes and fuel blockades as a strategic weapon against Israel and its allies.
The most significant example was the 1973 oil crisis, where the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) led by Saudi Arabia imposed an embargo on oil exports to the United States, Canada, Japan, and several Western European countries. This was done in response to the West's support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
The goals of these Arab oil and fuel blockades were multifaceted:
Economic pressure - The aim was to inflict economic damage on Israel and its allies by restricting their access to critical energy supplies.
Political leverage - The fuel blockades were intended to compel Western governments to reconsider their pro-Israel foreign policies.
Disruption of military operations - Restricting fuel availability was seen as a way to undermine Israel's military capabilities and war efforts.
The Arab oil embargo of 1973 in particular had a major global impact, leading to an energy crisis, skyrocketing oil prices, and economic recession in many countries. This demonstrated the substantial geopolitical leverage the Arab states could wield through controlling vital energy resources.
However, the long-term effectiveness of these fuel blockades as a strategic weapon was limited. Israel was eventually able to find alternative sources of fuel, and the global backlash against the embargoes also damaged the Arab states' international standing and relationships.
