Hydrovolt Energy’s Post

I always get confused reading this sort of article - https://lnkd.in/exdh3fqr - on one hand, I do share the worry that many use the promise of Carbon Capture and Storage as an excuse to keep burning fossil carbon fuels - which is bad. On the other hand, if we are to keep a (non virgin fossil) source of carbon as a feedstock to supply all the paints, adhesives, synthetic textiles, cleaning products, pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, upholstery, furniture, car interiors, electrical insulation, plastics and sustainable aviation fuel we seem to need to make our world safe and comfortable (plus various indulgences), then we are going to need a very large source of carbon (variously estimated to be between 7 and 8 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent) by 2050 - so we will probably have to use carbon dioxide as a source, so will need a means to efficiently capture it from the atmosphere. This technology will be an evolution of current carbon capture processes. The carbon dioxide currently stored might be able to supplement this source (alongside all that excess carbon dioxide we have been "storing" in the atmosphere!). But currently, "Carbon Capture and Storage" is a cost, but "Carbon Capture and Utilisation" might well be an investment. Shame we are too busy being critical of others to think through the possible larger picture future!

[AKBC-KABC Joint Meeting] Green Transition: Kyu Hong Lee, CSO at Elecseed a Corporate Member of AustCham Korea, presented on their Project Helios, a key initiative aimed at reducing carbon emissions from cement production, which currently contributes approximately 2.9 billion metric tonnes of CO2 annually. By utilizing supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) derived from coal-fired power stations, Elecseed's technology can replace over 50% of traditional clinker-based cement, significantly reducing CO2 emissions. The project’s potential impact is substantial, with the ability to lower emissions by 1 million tonnes for every 15 million tonnes of cement replaced with SCMs. Elecseed also outlined its broader strategy for a "closed loop" collaboration between the two nations, emphasizing three pillars: Technology and Investment, Decarbonisation, and Trade & Knowledge. The company envisions Korean investment in Australian green energy projects, the deployment of Korean technology in manufacturing and power plants, and the export of Australian hydrogen to Korea. This integrated approach not only supports mutual decarbonization goals but also fosters deeper trade and knowledge exchange, positioning both countries as leaders in the global green energy transition.

OUR VISION FOR 2030 🌱Green Hydrogen: we aim to create an environmentally sustainable industry that contributes to reducing dependence on oil resources and improving the environmental situation. 💵Costs: ensures minimal implementation and operational costs. We strive for efficient resource use, aligning with the Vision 2030 strategy of developing innovative and economically efficient technologies. 🚛Transportable technology: easily adaptable and can be moved to different regions, allowing for efficient use of renewable resources across the country. 🤝Safety: enables the production of green hydrogen at low temperatures, making the process safe and efficient and not Explosive! 💡Production materials: use of readily available and widely distributed materials, making it economically advantageous and accessible.

The Highlights from Wärtsilä's Report on Sustainable Fuels for Shipping by 2050: Urgent Decarbonization Needed: Shipping must act swiftly to meet climate goals. Exploring Fuel Options: Hydrogen, ammonia, biofuels, and more have potential, but challenges remain. Technological Innovation: Advancements in fuel tech are crucial for the transition. Strong Regulations Required: Policies should drive the shift to low-carbon solutions. Collaboration is Key: Industry-wide partnerships and investments are essential. Read the full report here: https://wartsi.ly/4ciay77

Startup is Building the World's Largest Ocean-Based Carbon Plant - and It's Scalable: An anonymous reader shared this report from CNN: On a slice of the ocean front in west Singapore, a startup is building a plant to turn carbon dioxide from air and seawater into the same material as seashells, in a process that will also produce "green" hydrogen — a much-hyped clean fuel. The cluster of low-slung buildings starting to take shape in Tuas will become the "world's largest" ocean-based carbon dioxide removal plant when completed later this year, according to Equatic, the startup behind it that was spun out of the University of California at Los Angeles. The idea is that the plant will pull water from the ocean, zap it with an electric current and run air through it to produce a series of chemical reactions to trap and store carbon dioxide as minerals, which can be put back in the sea or used on land... The $20 million facility will be fully operational by the end of the year and able to remove 3,650 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually, said Edward Sanders, chief operating officer of Equatic, which has partnered with Singapore's National Water Agency to construct the plant. That amount is equivalent to taking roughly 870 average passenger cars off the road. The ambition is to scale up to 100,000 metric tons of CO2 removal a year by the end of 2026, and from there to millions of metric tons over the next few decades, Sanders told CNN. The plant can be replicated pretty much anywhere, he said, stacked up in modules "like lego blocks...." The upfront costs are high but the company says it plans to make money by selling carbon credits to polluters to offset their pollution, as well as selling the hydrogen produced during the process. Equatic has already signed a deal with Boeing to sell it 2,100 metric tons of hydrogen, which it plans to use to create green fuel, and to fund the removal of 62,000 metric tons of CO2. There's other projects around the world attempting ocean-based carbon renewal, CNN notes. "Other projects include sprinkling iron particles into the ocean to stimulate CO2-absorbing phytoplankton, sinking seaweed into the depths to lock up carbon and spraying particles into marine clouds to reflect away some of the sun's energy." But carbon-removal projects are controversial, criticized for being expensive, unproven at scale and a distraction from policies to cut fossil fuels. And when they involve the oceans — complex ecosystems already under huge strain from global warming — criticisms can get even louder. There are "big knowledge gaps" when it comes to ocean geoengineering generally, said Jean-Pierre Gatusso, an ocean scientist at the Sorbonne University in France. "I am very concerned with the fact that science lags behind the industry," he told CNN. Read more of this story at Slashdot.

🌍 Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): A Step Toward Zero Footprint 🌱 As the world strives to reduce carbon emissions and achieve zero footprint, Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)has emerged as a powerful green technology. Here’s why CCS is becoming an essential part of the sustainability movement: 💨 What is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)? CCS involves capturing CO₂ emissions from industrial processes or directly from the atmosphere, transporting it, and storing it underground to prevent its release into the atmosphere. 🌬️ It’s a critical tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 🔬 How Does It Work? 1️⃣ Capture: CO₂ is captured from power plants, factories, or the air using advanced technology. 2️⃣ Transport: Once captured, the CO₂ is compressed and transported to storage sites. 3️⃣ Storage: The CO₂ is stored deep underground in geological formations, where it remains trapped and unable to escape back into the atmosphere. 🌍 ♻️ A Game-Changer for Sustainability - Significantly reduces emissions: CCS can capture up to 90% of CO₂ emissions from industrial sources, making it a powerful solution for industries that are hard to decarbonize. 🏭 - Offsets carbon footprints: By removing CO₂ from the atmosphere, CCS can help offset emissions, bringing us closer to a zero footprintfuture. 🌿 - Supports green energy: CCS works alongside renewable energy by capturing emissions from fossil fuel-based processes, providing a cleaner transition to a fully green energy economy. ⚡ 🚀 Recent Initiatives & Growth Governments and businesses worldwide are investing in CCS projects to meet climate targets. From large-scale storage projects to innovative startups, CCS is being integrated into carbon-neutral strategies globally. 🌍 🎯 Towards Zero Footprint CCS is not a stand-alone solution but a key piece of the net-zero puzzle. It works best when combined with other sustainable efforts like renewable energy, circular economy practices, and reforestation. Together, we can reduce our carbon footprint and build a more sustainable future! 🌱 #Greentechnology #Zerofootprint #Enviornment #Globalwarming #Sustainibility

Startup is Building the World's Largest Ocean-Based Carbon Plant - and It's Scalable: An anonymous reader shared this report from CNN: On a slice of the ocean front in west Singapore, a startup is building a plant to turn carbon dioxide from air and seawater into the same material as seashells, in a process that will also produce "green" hydrogen — a much-hyped clean fuel. The cluster of low-slung buildings starting to take shape in Tuas will become the "world's largest" ocean-based carbon dioxide removal plant when completed later this year, according to Equatic, the startup behind it that was spun out of the University of California at Los Angeles. The idea is that the plant will pull water from the ocean, zap it with an electric current and run air through it to produce a series of chemical reactions to trap and store carbon dioxide as minerals, which can be put back in the sea or used on land... The $20 million facility will be fully operational by the end of the year and able to remove 3,650 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually, said Edward Sanders, chief operating officer of Equatic, which has partnered with Singapore's National Water Agency to construct the plant. That amount is equivalent to taking roughly 870 average passenger cars off the road. The ambition is to scale up to 100,000 metric tons of CO2 removal a year by the end of 2026, and from there to millions of metric tons over the next few decades, Sanders told CNN. The plant can be replicated pretty much anywhere, he said, stacked up in modules "like lego blocks...." The upfront costs are high but the company says it plans to make money by selling carbon credits to polluters to offset their pollution, as well as selling the hydrogen produced during the process. Equatic has already signed a deal with Boeing to sell it 2,100 metric tons of hydrogen, which it plans to use to create green fuel, and to fund the removal of 62,000 metric tons of CO2. There's other projects around the world attempting ocean-based carbon renewal, CNN notes. "Other projects include sprinkling iron particles into the ocean to stimulate CO2-absorbing phytoplankton, sinking seaweed into the depths to lock up carbon and spraying particles into marine clouds to reflect away some of the sun's energy." But carbon-removal projects are controversial, criticized for being expensive, unproven at scale and a distraction from policies to cut fossil fuels. And when they involve the oceans — complex ecosystems already under huge strain from global warming — criticisms can get even louder. There are "big knowledge gaps" when it comes to ocean geoengineering generally, said Jean-Pierre Gatusso, an ocean scientist at the Sorbonne University in France. "I am very concerned with the fact that science lags behind the industry," he told CNN. Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Carbon capture technology today plays a significant role toward achieving Net-Zero.

Solar, wind, and storage decommissioning represents an incredible opportunity to return real material inputs back into our supply chain, offering incredible economic and environmental benefits to all. The alternative is grim. Technological innovations help to reduce resource depletion, or switch us to different resources, but barring physics defying innovation, all material is finite. We either divert from landfills now, or spend untold billions more when we ultimately need to reclaim landfills as the most cost effective or spatially necessary solution. Sustainability is filled with questions like this, which is why I teach that it's a principle impossible to be separated from business and economics instruction. You either handle an issue now, or end up paying far more than any initial investment. It's no different than a decision to perform maintenance on an HVAC machine. Why do we treat sustainability investments like they have less merit?