Drew Horsell’s Post

View profile for Drew Horsell, graphic

Business leader, Australian Army veteran, husband, father of two, passionate about solving complex problems in the simplest manner

Can any Royal Australian Navy Old Salts help me here??? If we are disposing of Defence Australias hydrographic survey capability, and not proceeding with projects such as #SEA1905 for our mine countermeasures and military survey capability... How can we be a focused force and fight in the littoral environment when that fight will be in the archipelagic region to our north consisting of thousands and thousands of islands and reefs?

If I can be the first out on a limb...and no not Navy....there is a move to autonomous ships, which may or may not serve the purpose of continuous surveillance operation in those areas mentioned and monitoring of those from land or sea. With the SEA3000 not to far away, relatively speaking, there is probably a need to scale back on the periphery Navy requirements (that may become autonomous) and redirect current staff and future service people to where they will be needed, after all SEA3000 has the possibility of increasing from an original total of 12 to 20 vessels. The extras are general purpose frigates, which may be used to support the autonomous fleet. But as always this is all supposition so lets see what everyone else has to say.....IMHO

Marty Hillier

Technical Writer at large...

5mo

A modular hydrographic suite can be easily added to a number of the current Navy vessels.

Duncan MacRae

Senior Consultant | Freelance Writer

5mo

Really valid question Drew and I suspect the general "official" answer would be in the use of autonomous systems. For general hydro/survey, the commercial provider route (no pun intended my Droggie friends) was decided several years ago, notionally to allow naval assets to focus more on the more niche military survey role, how this has tracked I'm unsure. (Chris Walter, Stewart Dunne, Alastair Walsh, CPPM, MAIPM???) The real sea mining problem for Australia resides in/near our ports and in the current climate, a solution dealing with the actual scale and impact of an adversary's deliberate mining campaign is more likely to be achieved through localised private investment/endeavour. They can manage the required small/many/attritable nature of a counter-mine solution far better than Defence's clunky capability management behemoth and there just isn't the money in Navy's coffers for it I suspect.

Ian M.

Business Development Manager at Logistic Engineering Services | Veteran

5mo

Autonomous, attritable systems to replace large, expensive, and sustainment-heavy capabilities seem to be the flavour of the month/year at the moment. I can definitely see the attraction there - they can be iterated and fielded at a pace unachievable by crewed capabilities and can often outpace/outmatch them in terms of technological currency through life. I can also see in the near term, something similar to what's happening in the Land space - UUVs and their ilk may just get gripped up under a single "program" managed under NSSG or the like with rolling input from forward-leaning industry OEMs, ASCA, etc. 🤷♂️

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics